Curtis Daniel M, Pullen W Michael, Murray Iain R, Money Adam, Safran Marc
Reno Orthopedic Center, 555 N. Arlington Ave., Reno, NV, 89503, USA.
Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023 Jan;31(1):33-39. doi: 10.1007/s00167-022-06998-1. Epub 2022 Jun 21.
Hip microinstability has emerged as a contributor to young adult, non-arthritic hip pain. There is a paucity of objective clinical data to identify patients with hip microinstability and guide surgical treatment. The purpose of this study was to identify the degree of distractibility in patients with and without microinstability undergoing hip arthroscopy.
A single-surgeon series of hip arthroscopies were retrospectively reviewed from 2014-2020. All procedures were performed with paralysis on a fracture table with a perineal post where 1 turn of fine traction equates to 4 mm of axial traction. Diagnosis was recorded as isolated instability, instability plus femoroacetabular impingement (FAI), and isolated FAI. Operative reports were reviewed to collect patient demographic data, number of turns of traction required for adequate distraction of the femoral head relative to the acetabulum (10 mm), and the presence of residual subluxation after initial traction was released.
A total of 464 patients were identified, 26 (5.6%) with isolated microinstability, 183 (39.4%) with microinstability with FAI anatomy, and 255 (55.0%) with FAI. The concurrent diagnosis of microinstability was associated with decreased turns required to adequately distract the hip. Isolated microinstability patients required 6.9 turns (IQR 4.6-8.8) while those with instability plus FAI required 8.8 turns (IQR 6.5-11) and isolated FAI required 19.1 turns (IQR 15-22). Residual subluxation after removal of negative intra-articular pressure but before performing the hip arthroscopy was more commonly associated with instability, occurring in 84.6% of isolated instability and 86.9% of instability plus FAI as compared with 29.8% in the isolated FAI cohort.
A diagnosis of hip microinstability, with or without features of FAI, is associated with decreased axial traction required to distract the hip. These data support the use of intra-operative ease of distraction as a method of identifying patients with hip microinstability.
Level III.
髋关节微不稳定已成为导致年轻成人非关节炎性髋关节疼痛的一个因素。目前缺乏客观的临床数据来识别髋关节微不稳定患者并指导手术治疗。本研究的目的是确定接受髋关节镜检查的有和没有微不稳定的患者的可牵引程度。
回顾性分析了2014年至2020年由单一外科医生进行的一系列髋关节镜检查。所有手术均在配有会阴柱的骨折手术台上进行,术中使用麻痹,1圈精细牵引相当于4毫米轴向牵引。诊断记录为单纯不稳定、不稳定合并股骨髋臼撞击症(FAI)和单纯FAI。查阅手术报告以收集患者人口统计学数据、使股骨头相对于髋臼充分牵开所需的牵引圈数(10毫米)以及初始牵引释放后残留半脱位的情况。
共纳入464例患者,其中26例(5.6%)为单纯微不稳定,183例(39.4%)为伴有FAI解剖结构的微不稳定,255例(55.0%)为FAI。微不稳定的同时诊断与充分牵开髋关节所需的牵引圈数减少有关。单纯微不稳定患者需要6.9圈(四分位间距4.6 - 8.8),而伴有不稳定加FAI的患者需要8.8圈(四分位间距6.5 - 11),单纯FAI患者需要19.1圈(四分位间距15 - 22)。在去除关节内负压后但在进行髋关节镜检查前残留半脱位更常见于不稳定情况,在单纯不稳定患者中发生率为84.6%,在不稳定加FAI患者中为86.9%,而在单纯FAI队列中为29.8%。
髋关节微不稳定的诊断,无论有无FAI特征,都与牵开髋关节所需的轴向牵引减少有关。这些数据支持将术中牵开的难易程度作为识别髋关节微不稳定患者的一种方法。
三级。