Head of Centre for Medical and Health Sciences Education, School of Medicine, University of Auckland; Anaesthetist, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland.
Anaesthetist, Auckland City Hospital, Level 8 Department of Anaesthesia, Auckland.
N Z Med J. 2022 Apr 1;135:101-111.
Once it became apparent that COVID-19 would reach Aotearoa New Zealand, perioperative services responded urgently to contain viral spread, keep staff safe and maintain patient care. We aimed to understand how perioperative leaders around the country responded to the pandemic, their experiences, reflections and the lessons learnt. Our goal is to inform future pandemic responses.
We undertook a qualitative study with thematic analysis of semi-structured interviews. We recruited perioperative leads involved in the COVID-19 response using snowball sampling, following initial contact with anaesthetic and surgical department heads.
We interviewed 33 perioperative leads from 16 of the country's 20 district health boards, with representation across hospitals of different sizes and the professional groups working in operating theatres. Four main themes were identified from data. These were: "no one source of truth," with prolific, constantly changing information, limited initial support from hospital senior executives, and siloed approaches and tensions between departments and professional groups; resourcing challenges attributed to limited baseline preparedness and increased workload; deficiencies in PPE and physical facilities; staff stress and anxiety, and the impact this had on workforce capacity; ongoing preparedness for future waves; and reflections on "lessons learnt". These lessons focused strongly on communication, caring for staff, collaboration, downtime to enable preparation, and a need for external, potentially national co-ordination and resources to facilitate planning.
Perioperative leaders' experiences and reflections of COVID-19 paint a picture of limited prior preparation or planning for a pandemic, requiring an immediate pivot from routine care to emergency response. In an environment of uncertainty, information overload and staff stress hospital leaders worked to obtain resources, maintain staff safety and engagement, develop new systems and in some cases, create new facilities. Sharing the experiences and lessons learned about communication and collaboration, policy development and staff training may go some way to facilitate a smoother implementation of a pandemic response the next time around.
一旦 COVID-19 明显会传播到新西兰,围手术期服务部门就紧急做出反应,以控制病毒传播,保障员工安全并维持患者护理。我们旨在了解全国围手术期领导者如何应对大流行,他们的经验、反思和吸取的教训。我们的目标是为未来的大流行应对提供信息。
我们对围手术期领导进行了定性研究,并对半结构化访谈进行了主题分析。我们使用滚雪球抽样法招募了参与 COVID-19 应对工作的围手术期领导,最初与麻醉和外科部门负责人联系后,就开始进行招募。
我们采访了来自全国 20 个地区卫生局中的 16 个卫生局的 33 名围手术期领导,代表了不同规模医院和在手术室工作的专业团体。从数据中确定了四个主要主题。这些主题是:“没有单一的真相来源”,信息丰富且不断变化,医院高层管理人员最初提供的支持有限,部门之间存在孤立的方法和紧张关系以及专业团体之间;资源挑战归因于基本准备不足和工作量增加;个人防护装备和物理设施不足;员工压力和焦虑,以及这对劳动力能力的影响;为未来浪潮做好持续准备;以及对“吸取的教训”的反思。这些教训主要集中在沟通、关心员工、协作、为准备工作腾出时间以及需要外部的、潜在的全国协调和资源来促进计划。
围手术期领导者对 COVID-19 的经验和反思描绘了一幅对大流行缺乏事先准备或计划的画面,需要立即从常规护理转向紧急应对。在不确定、信息过载和员工压力的环境中,医院领导者努力获取资源,确保员工安全和参与度,开发新系统,在某些情况下,还创建了新设施。分享关于沟通和协作、政策制定和员工培训的经验和教训,可能有助于更顺利地实施下一次大流行应对。