Suppr超能文献

比较 Geenius HCV 补充检测与 Inno-LIA HCV 评分检测在抗 HCV 抗体检测中的应用。

Comparative evaluation of the Geenius HCV supplemental assay and Inno-LIA HCV score assay in detecting anti-HCV antibodies.

机构信息

Institut National de la Transfusion Sanguine (INTS), Département des Agents Transmissibles par le Sang, Centre National de Référence Risques Infectieux Transfusionnels, 6, rue Alexandre Cabanel 75015, Paris, France.

Institut National de la Transfusion Sanguine (INTS), Département des Agents Transmissibles par le Sang, Centre National de Référence Risques Infectieux Transfusionnels, 6, rue Alexandre Cabanel 75015, Paris, France.

出版信息

Transfus Clin Biol. 2022 Aug;29(3):205-208. doi: 10.1016/j.tracli.2022.06.005. Epub 2022 Jun 18.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study compared two assays aimed at confirming the presence of anti-HCV antibodies (Ab) after a positive screening: Geenius HCV supplemental assay (Bio-Rad, Marne la Coquette, France) and the Inno-LIA HCV score assay (Fujirebio, Les Ulis, France).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 180 archived samples were investigated including 119 samples collected at different stages of HCV infection in 25 hemodialyzed patients who underwent HCV seroconversion, 14 samples from 4 commercial seroconversion panels, 47 Ab positive/HCV-RNA positive blood donations of which 7 showing an single reactivity in confirmatory assays. Samples were investigated and results were interpreted with the two assays according to the manufacturers' instructions.

RESULTS

Overall, Geenius and Inno-LIA were concordant for 84% (151/180) samples: 38 negative, 17 indeterminate and 96 positive. Of the 29 discrepant results, 26 were overclassified with Inno-LIA. HCV seroconversion was detected with Inno-LIA 4 and 7 days prior to Geenius in two panels. The high positive rate observed with Inno-LIA (64%) compared to Geenius (54%) was mainly due to low reactivities considered positive according to interpretation criteria, which could affect specificity.

CONCLUSION

Although HCV supplemental assays are not recommended for the diagnostic of HCV infection, which is primarily based on HCV-RNA testing, both assays are suitable as second line anti-HCV tests when Ab screening is positive and RNA testing cannot be performed. Moreover, Geenius system provides an objective result in less than 30minutes, which is compatible when a rapid diagnostic is required.

摘要

目的

本研究比较了两种旨在确认抗 HCV 抗体 (Ab) 存在的检测方法,这两种方法均在 HCV 抗体筛查阳性后进行:Geenius HCV 补充检测(法国马恩拉科特的伯乐)和 Inno-LIA HCV 评分检测(法国勒伊利斯的富士瑞比欧)。

材料和方法

共检测了 180 份存档样本,包括 25 名接受 HCV 血清转换的血液透析患者在 HCV 感染不同阶段采集的 119 份样本、4 份商业血清转换试剂盒的 14 份样本、47 份 Ab 阳性/HCV-RNA 阳性的献血样本,其中 7 份在确认检测中仅表现为单一反应性。根据制造商的说明,使用这两种检测方法对样本进行检测并解释结果。

结果

总体而言,Geenius 和 Inno-LIA 在 84%(151/180)的样本中结果一致:38 份阴性、17 份不确定、96 份阳性。在 29 份不一致的结果中,26 份被 Inno-LIA 过度分类。在两个试剂盒中,Inno-LIA 可在 Geenius 之前 4 天和 7 天检测到 HCV 血清转换。与 Geenius(54%)相比,Inno-LIA 观察到的高阳性率(64%)主要归因于根据解释标准认为阳性的低反应性,这可能会影响特异性。

结论

尽管 HCV 补充检测不建议用于 HCV 感染的诊断,该诊断主要基于 HCV-RNA 检测,但当 Ab 筛查阳性且无法进行 RNA 检测时,这两种检测均可作为二线抗 HCV 检测方法。此外,Geenius 系统在不到 30 分钟内提供客观结果,当需要快速诊断时,这是兼容的。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验