Lin Zhi-Min, Li Zhou, Weng Pei-Ying, Wu Dong-Qing, Zou Jing-Nan, Pang Zi-Qin, Lin Wen-Xiong
Institute of Agroecology, College of Life Sciences, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry Univer-sity, Fuzhou 350002, China.
Subtropical Agriculture Research Institute, Fujian Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Zhangzhou 363005, Fujian, China.
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2022 May;33(5):1340-1351. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202205.013.
It is of great significance to understand the effects of different rice cultivation methods in southeast China on greenhouse gas emission characteristics and carbon footprint of paddy fields during rice cultivation for rice sustainable production. In this study, the popular conventional rice 'Jiafuzhan' and hybrid rice 'Yongyou 2640' were used as materials to establish four rice cultivation patterns suitable for different ecological types in Fujian Province: 1) double-cropping system, early rice and late rice with Jiafuzhan (D-J); 2) early maturing ratooning system, first season rice and ratooning season rice with Jiafuzhan (R-J); 3) middle-maturing ratooning system, first season rice and ratooning season with Yongyou 2640 (R-Y); and 4) single cropping system with Yongyou 2640 (S-Y), which should be synchronized in heading time with the counterpart (the ratooning season rice). Greenhouse gas emissions from paddy soil were measured by the closed static black box observation method and the gas chromatography method, respectively. The total direct and indirect greenhouse gas emissions (carbon footprints) from different rice farming patterns were evaluated by using the life cycle analysis. The results showed that greenhouse gas emissions in different rice cropping systems were lower in the early growth stage, then decreased after reaching the peak at the booting stage, demonstrating a double peak curve in the whole growth stage, in which the first peak was higher in early season or first season than the second peak in the late season or ratooning season in the cropping patterns. Moreover, the total greenhouse gas emissions were significantly different among cropping systems. The global warming potential (GWP) of different cropping patterns was in order of R-Y>D-J>S-Y>R-J, while the annual greenhouse gas emission intensity (GHGI) was D-J>S-Y>R-Y>R-J. GWP and GHGI of the ratooning system decreased by 26.1% and 14.1%, respectively, compared with those of the double-cropping system. The same pattern was observed in the ratooning rice of Yongyou 2640, which were decreased by 74.3% and 56.7%, respectively, compared with the counterpart, Yongyou 2640 in a single-cropping system synchronized heading. Carbon footprint of rice per unit yield ranged from 0.38-1.08 kg CO-eq.·kg under the different cropping systems, of which the carbon footprint of rice per unit yield was the highest under the double cropping system compared with that under other cropping systems. The reverse was true in the case of carbon footprint of rice per unit yield under the ratooning system with Yongyou 2640. Additionally, the main source of carbon footprint of different rice cropping patterns was CH, contributing 44.2%-71.5%, suggesting that rice ratooning system could significantly reduce global warming potential and carbon emission intensity of rice in comparison with other cropping patterns. Therefore, it is key to select rice varieties with high yield and low carbon emission and to establish the supporting scientific cultivation techniques for effective reduction of CH emission and carbon footprint of paddy fields and promotion of ratooning rice production.
了解中国东南部不同水稻种植方式对水稻种植期间稻田温室气体排放特征和碳足迹的影响,对水稻可持续生产具有重要意义。本研究以常规水稻品种‘嘉福占’和杂交水稻品种‘甬优2640’为材料,构建了适合福建省不同生态类型的4种水稻种植模式:1)双季稻模式,早稻和晚稻均为‘嘉福占’(D-J);2)早熟再生稻模式,头季稻和再生季稻均为‘嘉福占’(R-J);3)中熟再生稻模式,头季稻为‘甬优2640’,再生季稻为‘甬优2640’(R-Y);4)单季稻模式,单季种植‘甬优2640’(S-Y),其中再生季稻与对应头季稻抽穗期同步。分别采用密闭静态黑箱观测法和气相色谱法测定稻田土壤温室气体排放。运用生命周期分析法评估不同水稻种植模式的直接和间接温室气体排放总量(碳足迹)。结果表明,不同水稻种植系统的温室气体排放在生育前期较低,孕穗期达到峰值后下降,全生育期呈双峰曲线,其中双季稻或头季稻的第一个峰值高于再生季稻或后季稻的第二个峰值。此外,不同种植系统间温室气体排放总量差异显著。不同种植模式的全球升温潜能值(GWP)顺序为R-Y>D-J>S-Y>R-J,而年温室气体排放强度(GHGI)顺序为D-J>S-Y>R-Y>R-J。与双季稻模式相比,再生稻模式的GWP和GHGI分别降低了26.1%和14.1%。‘甬优2640’再生稻模式与单季种植抽穗期同步的‘甬优2640’相比,GWP和GHGI分别降低了74.3%和56.7%。不同种植系统下单位产量水稻的碳足迹范围为0.38-1.08 kg CO₂-eq.·kg⁻¹,其中双季稻模式下单位产量水稻的碳足迹高于其他种植系统。‘甬优2640’再生稻模式下单位产量水稻的碳足迹则相反。此外,不同水稻种植模式碳足迹的主要来源是CH₄,贡献率为44.2%-71.5%,表明与其他种植模式相比,再生稻模式可显著降低水稻的全球升温潜能值和碳排放强度。因此,选择高产低排放水稻品种并建立配套科学栽培技术是有效减少稻田CH₄排放和碳足迹、促进再生稻生产的关键。