Charles River Laboratories, 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands.
Toxicol Pathol. 2022 Jun;50(4):466-477. doi: 10.1177/01926233221103273. Epub 2022 Jun 22.
For toxicology testing of (agro)chemicals, different study types are being performed with general and/or reproductive toxicity endpoints (see Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development guidelines). In most of these rat studies, vaginal cytology is performed on serial samples (collected by lavage) for evaluation of cycle regularity and evidence of mating, and/or on a single sample collected on the day of necropsy for information on the estrous cycle stage and allowing correlation with histopathology. In the latter case, the utility of vaginal cytology can be argued. In this article, estrous cycle stages based on vaginal cytology of samples taken on the day of necropsy and histopathology of ovaries, uterus, and vagina (gold standard for estrous cycle stage assessment) were compared. The agreement was generally low. Disagreement between the two methods could be explained by time differences between lavage and necropsy, by manipulation of vaginal epithelium during lavage which may impact epithelial morphology on histology, and by misinterpretation of vaginal cytology during or shortly after lactation. Based on the results of estrous staging within different study types, we strongly discourage vaginal cytology from samples collected on the day of necropsy since there is no added value, vaginal manipulation can be stressful and may complicate the histologic diagnosis.
对于(农)化学品的毒理学测试,通常采用具有一般和/或生殖毒性终点的不同研究类型(见经济合作与发展组织指南)。在这些大鼠研究中,大多数都对连续采集的(通过冲洗收集的)阴道细胞学样本进行评估,以评估周期规律和交配证据,和/或在尸检当天采集单个样本,以获得关于发情周期阶段的信息,并允许与组织病理学相关联。在后一种情况下,可以对阴道细胞学的实用性进行论证。在本文中,我们比较了基于尸检当天采集的样本的阴道细胞学和卵巢、子宫和阴道的组织病理学(发情周期阶段评估的金标准)来确定发情周期阶段。总体而言,一致性通常较低。两种方法之间的分歧可以通过冲洗和尸检之间的时间差异、冲洗过程中对阴道上皮的操作(可能会影响组织学上的上皮形态)以及在哺乳期或哺乳期后不久对阴道细胞学的错误解释来解释。基于不同研究类型内发情阶段的结果,我们强烈反对从尸检当天采集的样本中进行阴道细胞学检查,因为这样做没有任何附加价值,阴道操作可能会有压力,并且可能会使组织学诊断复杂化。