Laboratory of Comparative Sensory Physiology, Sechenov Institute of Evolutionary Physiology and Biochemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg, Russia.
J Neurophysiol. 2022 Jul 1;128(1):263-277. doi: 10.1152/jn.00519.2021. Epub 2022 Jun 22.
Of many light adaptation mechanisms optimizing photoreceptor functioning in the compound eyes of insects, those modifying the single-photon response, the quantum bump (QB), remain least studied. Here, by recording from photoreceptors of the blow fly , the hover fly , and the cockroach , we investigated mechanisms of rapid light adaptation by examining how properties of QBs change after light stimulation and multiquantal impulse responses during repetitive stimulation. In . , light stimulation reduced latencies, characteristic durations, and amplitudes of QBs in an intensity- and duration-dependent manner. In . , only QB amplitudes decreased consistently. In both species, time constants of QB parameters' recovery increased with the strength and duration of stimulation, reaching ∼30 s after bright prolonged 10-s pulses. In the blow fly, changes in QB amplitudes during recovery correlated with changes in half-widths but not latencies, suggesting at least two separate mechanisms of light adaptation: acceleration of QB onset by sensitizing transduction channels and acceleration of transduction channel inactivation causing QB shortening and decrease. In the cockroach, light adaptation reduced QB amplitude by apparently lowering the transduction channel availability. Impulse response data in the blow fly and cockroach were consistent with the inferences from the QB recovery experiments. However, in the hover fly , impulse response latencies and durations decreased simultaneously, whereas amplitudes decreased little, even when bright flashes were applied at high frequencies. These findings indicate the existence of dissimilar mechanisms of light adaptation in the microvilli of different species. By studying light adaptation of elementary responses in photoreceptors of the blow fly and the cockroach we found three distinct mechanisms. In the blow fly, one mechanism speeds quantum bump onset and another accelerates quantum bump inactivation, decreasing its size. In the cockroach, quantum bump amplitude decreases without changes in kinetics, indicating decreased availability of transduction channels. The findings can be explained by expression of different transduction channels in the flies and cockroaches.
在昆虫复眼中优化光感受器功能的许多光适应机制中,那些改变单光子反应的机制,即量子凸起(QB),仍然研究得最少。在这里,我们通过记录摇蚊、食蚜蝇和蟑螂的光感受器,研究了快速光适应的机制,通过检查 QB 的特性在光刺激后和重复刺激期间多量子脉冲反应中的变化来研究。在摇蚊中,光刺激以强度和持续时间依赖的方式降低 QB 的潜伏期、特征持续时间和幅度。在食蚜蝇中,只有 QB 幅度持续降低。在这两种物种中,QB 参数恢复的时间常数随着刺激的强度和持续时间的增加而增加,在明亮延长的 10 秒脉冲后约 30 秒达到最大值。在摇蚊中,恢复过程中 QB 幅度的变化与半宽度的变化相关,但与潜伏期无关,这表明至少存在两种不同的光适应机制:通过敏化转导通道加速 QB 的起始,以及通过加速转导通道失活导致 QB 缩短和幅度降低。在蟑螂中,光适应通过明显降低转导通道的可用性来降低 QB 幅度。摇蚊和蟑螂的脉冲响应数据与 QB 恢复实验的推论一致。然而,在食蚜蝇中,脉冲响应的潜伏期和持续时间同时降低,而幅度降低很少,即使应用明亮的闪光频率很高。这些发现表明不同物种的微绒毛中存在不同的光适应机制。通过研究摇蚊和蟑螂光感受器的基本反应的光适应,我们发现了三种不同的机制。在摇蚊中,一种机制加速量子凸起的起始,另一种机制加速量子凸起的失活,减小其幅度。在蟑螂中,量子凸起的幅度减小而动力学没有变化,表明转导通道的可用性降低。这些发现可以用苍蝇和蟑螂中表达不同的转导通道来解释。