Rapid On-site Evaluation and Final Cytologic Diagnoses Correlation During Endobronchial Ultrasonography.

BACKGROUND

The cost-effectiveness and low rate of inadequate sampling with the use of rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) along with endobronchial ultrasonography (EBUS) is well established. Our aim in this study was to evaluate the correlation of ROSE during EBUS and final cytologic diagnosis and also to see if ROSE might predict the subtype of lung cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All consecutive subjects who attended our clinic between January 2016 and January 2019 for the evaluation of pathologic mediastinal and/or hilar lymph nodes (LNs)/mass using EBUS were enrolled into our prospective study. ROSE was performed in the same operating room with EBUS. ROSE results during EBUS were recorded. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of ROSE compared with the final cytologic diagnosis were evaluated.

RESULTS

We enrolled 684 LN/mass lesions belonging to 328 patients into this study. When we compared ROSE results and final cytologic diagnosis, these procedures agreed on 91.6% of the LNs (P<0.001). The sensitivity of ROSE and final cytologic diagnosis for granulomatous inflammation was 72.5%, and for lung cancer, it was 89.2% (P<0.001). The sensitivity of ROSE for the adenocarcinoma subtype of lung cancer was 67.7%, and it was 70% for small cell lung cancer.

CONCLUSION

ROSE may help to recognize non-small cell lung cancer during EBUS, especially the adenocarcinoma subtype of lung cancer, which will help ensure having sufficient material for molecular analysis.