Haynes Andrew S, Prinzi Andrea, Silveira Lori J, Parker Sarah K, Lampe Jed N, Kavanaugh Jeffrey S, Horswill Alexander R, Fish Douglas
Children's Hospital Colorado, Department of Pediatrics, Section of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campusgrid.430503.1, School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Microbiol Spectr. 2022 Aug 31;10(4):e0103922. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.01039-22. Epub 2022 Jun 22.
Cephalexin and cefadroxil are oral first-generation cephalosporins used to treat methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) infections. Despite its shorter half-life, cephalexin is more frequently prescribed, although cefadroxil is an appealing alternative, given its slower clearance and possibility for less frequent dosing. We report comparative MIC distributions for cefadroxil and cephalexin, as well as for oxacillin, cephalothin, ceftaroline, and cefazolin, for 48 unique clinical MSSA isolates from pediatric patients with musculoskeletal infections. Both cefadroxil and cephalexin had MIC values of 2 μg/mL and MIC values of 4 μg/mL. MICs for oxacillin, cephalothin, and ceftaroline were ≤0.25 μg/mL, and cefazolin's MIC was 0.5 μg/mL. While cefadroxil and cephalexin MICs are higher than those for other active agents, the distributions of MICs for cefadroxil and cephalexin are statistically equivalent, suggesting similar MSSA activities. Cefadroxil should be further considered an alternative agent to cephalexin, although additional work is needed to identify the optimal dose and frequency of these antibiotics for the treatment of serious MSSA infections. Cephalexin and cefadroxil are oral antibiotics that are used to treat serious infections due to the bacteria MSSA. While cephalexin is used more commonly, cefadroxil is excreted from the body more slowly; this generally allows patients to take cefadroxil less frequently than cephalexin. In this study, we compared the abilities of cefadroxil, cephalexin, and several other representative intravenous antibiotics to inhibit the growth of MSSA in the laboratory. Bacterial samples were obtained from children with bone, joint, and/or muscle infections caused by MSSA. We found that cefadroxil and cephalexin inhibited the growth of MSSA at similar concentrations, suggesting similar antibacterial potencies. The selected intravenous antistaphylococcal antibiotics generally inhibited bacterial growth with lower antibiotic concentrations. Based on these results, cefadroxil should be further considered an alternative oral antibiotic to cephalexin, although future research is needed to identify the optimal dose and frequency of these antibiotics for serious infections.
头孢氨苄和头孢羟氨苄是用于治疗对甲氧西林敏感的金黄色葡萄球菌(MSSA)感染的口服第一代头孢菌素。尽管头孢氨苄半衰期较短,但它的处方更频繁,不过头孢羟氨苄也是一种有吸引力的替代药物,因为它清除较慢,给药频率可能更低。我们报告了头孢羟氨苄和头孢氨苄以及苯唑西林、头孢噻吩、头孢托罗和头孢唑林对48株来自患有肌肉骨骼感染的儿科患者的独特临床MSSA分离株的比较MIC分布。头孢羟氨苄和头孢氨苄的MIC值均为2μg/mL和4μg/mL。苯唑西林、头孢噻吩和头孢托罗的MIC≤0.25μg/mL,头孢唑林的MIC为0.5μg/mL。虽然头孢羟氨苄和头孢氨苄的MIC高于其他活性药物,但头孢羟氨苄和头孢氨苄的MIC分布在统计学上是等效的,表明它们对MSSA的活性相似。头孢羟氨苄应进一步被视为头孢氨苄的替代药物,不过还需要更多工作来确定这些抗生素治疗严重MSSA感染的最佳剂量和给药频率。头孢氨苄和头孢羟氨苄是用于治疗由细菌MSSA引起的严重感染的口服抗生素。虽然头孢氨苄使用更普遍,但头孢羟氨苄从体内排泄更慢;这通常使患者服用头孢羟氨苄的频率低于头孢氨苄。在本研究中,我们比较了头孢羟氨苄、头孢氨苄和其他几种代表性静脉用抗生素在实验室中抑制MSSA生长的能力。细菌样本取自由MSSA引起的骨、关节和/或肌肉感染的儿童。我们发现头孢羟氨苄和头孢氨苄在相似浓度下抑制MSSA生长,表明抗菌效力相似。所选的静脉用抗葡萄球菌抗生素通常在较低抗生素浓度下抑制细菌生长。基于这些结果,头孢羟氨苄应进一步被视为头孢氨苄的替代口服抗生素,不过需要未来的研究来确定这些抗生素治疗严重感染的最佳剂量和给药频率。