Suppr超能文献

头孢羟氨苄与头孢氨苄相当:来自儿童肌肉骨骼感染的甲氧西林敏感金黄色葡萄球菌分离株的最低抑菌浓度

Cefadroxil Comparable to Cephalexin: Minimum Inhibitory Concentrations among Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Isolates from Pediatric Musculoskeletal Infections.

作者信息

Haynes Andrew S, Prinzi Andrea, Silveira Lori J, Parker Sarah K, Lampe Jed N, Kavanaugh Jeffrey S, Horswill Alexander R, Fish Douglas

机构信息

Children's Hospital Colorado, Department of Pediatrics, Section of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Aurora, Colorado, USA.

University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campusgrid.430503.1, School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA.

出版信息

Microbiol Spectr. 2022 Aug 31;10(4):e0103922. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.01039-22. Epub 2022 Jun 22.

Abstract

Cephalexin and cefadroxil are oral first-generation cephalosporins used to treat methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) infections. Despite its shorter half-life, cephalexin is more frequently prescribed, although cefadroxil is an appealing alternative, given its slower clearance and possibility for less frequent dosing. We report comparative MIC distributions for cefadroxil and cephalexin, as well as for oxacillin, cephalothin, ceftaroline, and cefazolin, for 48 unique clinical MSSA isolates from pediatric patients with musculoskeletal infections. Both cefadroxil and cephalexin had MIC values of 2 μg/mL and MIC values of 4 μg/mL. MICs for oxacillin, cephalothin, and ceftaroline were ≤0.25 μg/mL, and cefazolin's MIC was 0.5 μg/mL. While cefadroxil and cephalexin MICs are higher than those for other active agents, the distributions of MICs for cefadroxil and cephalexin are statistically equivalent, suggesting similar MSSA activities. Cefadroxil should be further considered an alternative agent to cephalexin, although additional work is needed to identify the optimal dose and frequency of these antibiotics for the treatment of serious MSSA infections. Cephalexin and cefadroxil are oral antibiotics that are used to treat serious infections due to the bacteria MSSA. While cephalexin is used more commonly, cefadroxil is excreted from the body more slowly; this generally allows patients to take cefadroxil less frequently than cephalexin. In this study, we compared the abilities of cefadroxil, cephalexin, and several other representative intravenous antibiotics to inhibit the growth of MSSA in the laboratory. Bacterial samples were obtained from children with bone, joint, and/or muscle infections caused by MSSA. We found that cefadroxil and cephalexin inhibited the growth of MSSA at similar concentrations, suggesting similar antibacterial potencies. The selected intravenous antistaphylococcal antibiotics generally inhibited bacterial growth with lower antibiotic concentrations. Based on these results, cefadroxil should be further considered an alternative oral antibiotic to cephalexin, although future research is needed to identify the optimal dose and frequency of these antibiotics for serious infections.

摘要

头孢氨苄和头孢羟氨苄是用于治疗对甲氧西林敏感的金黄色葡萄球菌(MSSA)感染的口服第一代头孢菌素。尽管头孢氨苄半衰期较短,但它的处方更频繁,不过头孢羟氨苄也是一种有吸引力的替代药物,因为它清除较慢,给药频率可能更低。我们报告了头孢羟氨苄和头孢氨苄以及苯唑西林、头孢噻吩、头孢托罗和头孢唑林对48株来自患有肌肉骨骼感染的儿科患者的独特临床MSSA分离株的比较MIC分布。头孢羟氨苄和头孢氨苄的MIC值均为2μg/mL和4μg/mL。苯唑西林、头孢噻吩和头孢托罗的MIC≤0.25μg/mL,头孢唑林的MIC为0.5μg/mL。虽然头孢羟氨苄和头孢氨苄的MIC高于其他活性药物,但头孢羟氨苄和头孢氨苄的MIC分布在统计学上是等效的,表明它们对MSSA的活性相似。头孢羟氨苄应进一步被视为头孢氨苄的替代药物,不过还需要更多工作来确定这些抗生素治疗严重MSSA感染的最佳剂量和给药频率。头孢氨苄和头孢羟氨苄是用于治疗由细菌MSSA引起的严重感染的口服抗生素。虽然头孢氨苄使用更普遍,但头孢羟氨苄从体内排泄更慢;这通常使患者服用头孢羟氨苄的频率低于头孢氨苄。在本研究中,我们比较了头孢羟氨苄、头孢氨苄和其他几种代表性静脉用抗生素在实验室中抑制MSSA生长的能力。细菌样本取自由MSSA引起的骨、关节和/或肌肉感染的儿童。我们发现头孢羟氨苄和头孢氨苄在相似浓度下抑制MSSA生长,表明抗菌效力相似。所选的静脉用抗葡萄球菌抗生素通常在较低抗生素浓度下抑制细菌生长。基于这些结果,头孢羟氨苄应进一步被视为头孢氨苄的替代口服抗生素,不过需要未来的研究来确定这些抗生素治疗严重感染的最佳剂量和给药频率。

相似文献

2
Cefadroxil and cephalexin pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in children with musculoskeletal infections.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2024 May 2;68(5):e0018224. doi: 10.1128/aac.00182-24. Epub 2024 Apr 10.
3
MIC Discrepancies between Parenteral and Oral Anti-Staphylococcal Beta-Lactams among MSSA.
Chemotherapy. 2023;68(1):55-60. doi: 10.1159/000526630. Epub 2022 Aug 24.
6
Nationwide Organism Susceptibility Patterns to Common Preoperative Prophylactic Antibiotics: What Are We Covering?
J Arthroplasty. 2019 Jul;34(7S):S302-S306. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.01.017. Epub 2019 Jan 17.
7
Comparison of cefazolin versus oxacillin for treatment of complicated bacteremia caused by methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014 Sep;58(9):5117-24. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02800-14. Epub 2014 Jun 16.

引用本文的文献

1
A Successful Nodular Basal Cell Carcinoma Defect Closure On The Mid-Cheek Using Modified Mini Cheek Advancement Flap.
Cancer Manag Res. 2025 Mar 8;17:499-507. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S513161. eCollection 2025.
2
Cefadroxil and cephalexin pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in children with musculoskeletal infections.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2024 May 2;68(5):e0018224. doi: 10.1128/aac.00182-24. Epub 2024 Apr 10.
3
First-Generation Cephalosporins for Treatment of Acute Hematogenous Osteomyelitis in Children: A Study of Efficacy and Adverse Effects.
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2023 Dec 14;10(12):ofad610. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofad610. eCollection 2023 Dec.

本文引用的文献

3
Twice- and Thrice-daily Cephalexin Dosing for Staphylococcus aureus Infections in Children.
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2020 Jun;39(6):519-522. doi: 10.1097/INF.0000000000002646.
7
Bone and Joint Infections.
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2017 Aug;36(8):788-799. doi: 10.1097/INF.0000000000001635.
9
Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of oral cephalexin in children with osteoarticular infections.
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2013 Dec;32(12):1340-4. doi: 10.1097/INF.0b013e3182a222a6.
10
Determination of an inoculum effect with various cephalosporins among clinical isolates of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010 May;54(5):2206-8. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01325-09. Epub 2010 Mar 8.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验