• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评价抗人 CD20 单克隆抗体在天疱疮患者中的临床相关性和生物学效应。

Evaluation of Clinical Relevance and Biological Effects of Antirituximab Antibodies in Patients With Pemphigus.

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, Normandie University, Université de Rouen, Inserm U1234, CHU Rouen, Rouen, France.

Department of Immunology, Normandie University, Université de Rouen, Inserm U1234, CHU Rouen, Rouen, France.

出版信息

JAMA Dermatol. 2022 Aug 1;158(8):893-899. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2022.2149.

DOI:10.1001/jamadermatol.2022.2149
PMID:35731529
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9218930/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

The clinical relevance of antirituximab antibodies (ARAs) in patients with pemphigus who are treated with rituximab (RTX) is currently unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the prevalence of ARAs in patients with pemphigus who are treated with RTX and their association with complete remission (CR) and relapse.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This post hoc analysis of the Ritux3 trial was conducted from January 2010 to December 2015 in 25 dermatology departments in France and included 42 patients with moderate-to-severe pemphigus who were randomized to receive treatment with RTX. Five additional patients were recruited for an ancillary study. The proportions of patients who achieved CR or relapsed after an initial treatment cycle of RTX were compared depending on whether patients had ARAs.

EXPOSURES

Patients were treated with 1000 mg of RTX on days 1 and 15 and 2 maintenance infusions of 500 mg at months 12 and 18.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Rates of relapse and sustained CR at month 36. Levels of ARAs, antidesmoglein 1/3 antibodies, RTX serum concentrations, and peripheral blood CD19+ B-cell frequency were measured.

RESULTS

Of 42 participants with vs without ARAs, the mean (SD) age was 55 (17) years and 56 (17) years, respectively; 25 (59.5%) were women. Antirituximab antibodies were detected in the serum samples of 13 of 42 patients (31%) during the first year. Nine patients who experienced relapse before month 12 were excluded because they received additional infusions and could not be further analyzed. Among the 33 remaining patients, 2 patients (6.1%) experienced relapse after month 12, and 31 (95.9%) maintained a sustained CR until month 36. The rate of sustained CR was not different whether patients had ARAs (11 of 13 [85%]) or not (20 of 20 [100%]) (P = .15). Both groups (ARA+ vs ARA-) also had similar CD19+ B-cell depletion and RTX levels, but patients with ARAs had higher anti-desmoglein 3 antibody (DSG3 Abs) levels compared with those without ARAs (mean [SD], 30.1 [50.9] AU/mL vs 4.0 [4.3] AU/mL; P = .03). The 2 patients with ARAs who experienced relapse after month 12 had an undetectable RTX level, incomplete B-cell depletion, and higher anti-DSG3 Abs level than the 11 patients who maintained a sustained CR with ARAs (RTX mean [SD] concentration, 0 ug/mL vs 12.5 [2.2] ug/mL; P = .03; incomplete B-cell depletion, 2 of 2 vs 4 of 11; P = .19; mean [SD] anti-DSG3 Abs levels, 103.5 [61.5] AU/mL vs 19.5 [11.0] AU/mL; P = .001) or patients without ARAs (mean [SD] RTX concentration, 0 ug/mL vs 13.5 [1.8] ug/mL; P = .02; incomplete B-cell depletion, 2 of 2 vs 5 of 20; P = .09; mean [SD] anti-DSG3 Abs level, 103.5 [61.5] AU/mL vs 4.0 [1.0] AU/mL; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

The results of this cohort study suggest that ARAs are frequently detected in patients with pemphigus who are treated with RTX and generally are not associated with patient outcomes. Only a few patients with the combination of ARAs, low RTX concentration, incomplete B-cell depletion, and persistent serum anti-DSG3 Abs seem at high risk of relapse.

摘要

重要性

目前尚不清楚接受利妥昔单抗(RTX)治疗的天疱疮患者体内抗利妥昔单抗抗体(ARAs)的临床相关性。

目的

确定接受 RTX 治疗的天疱疮患者中 ARAs 的患病率及其与完全缓解(CR)和复发的关系。

设计、地点和参与者:这项对 Ritux3 试验的事后分析于 2010 年 1 月至 2015 年 12 月在法国的 25 个皮肤科部门进行,纳入了 42 名中重度天疱疮患者,他们被随机分配接受 RTX 治疗。另外招募了 5 名患者进行辅助研究。根据患者是否存在 ARAs,比较了初始 RTX 治疗周期后达到 CR 或复发的患者比例。

暴露

患者在第 1 天和第 15 天接受 1000 mg 的 RTX 治疗,在第 12 个月和第 18 个月接受 2 次 500 mg 的维持输注。

主要结局和测量指标

第 36 个月时的复发率和持续 CR。测量 ARAs、抗桥粒芯糖蛋白 1/3 抗体、RTX 血清浓度和外周血 CD19+B 细胞频率。

结果

在有 vs 无 ARAs 的 42 名参与者中,平均(SD)年龄分别为 55(17)岁和 56(17)岁,分别有 25(59.5%)名女性。在第 1 年内,42 名患者中有 13 名(31%)血清样本中检测到抗利妥昔单抗抗体。由于接受了额外的输注,无法进一步分析,因此排除了 9 名在第 12 个月前复发的患者。在其余 33 名患者中,2 名(6.1%)在第 12 个月后复发,31 名(95.9%)在第 36 个月时持续 CR。是否存在 ARAs(13 名中有 11 名 [85%])并不影响持续 CR 的发生率(20 名中有 20 名 [100%])(P = .15)。两组(ARA+与 ARA-)的 CD19+B 细胞耗竭和 RTX 水平也相似,但与无 ARAs 的患者相比,有 ARAs 的患者的抗桥粒芯糖蛋白 3 抗体(DSG3 Abs)水平更高(平均[SD],30.1[50.9] AU/mL 比 4.0[4.3] AU/mL;P = .03)。在第 12 个月后复发的 2 名有 ARAs 的患者中,RTX 水平无法检测到,B 细胞不完全耗竭,抗 DSG3 Abs 水平高于 11 名持续有 ARAs 且 CR 的患者(RTX 平均[SD]浓度,0ug/mL 比 12.5[2.2]ug/mL;P = .03;不完全 B 细胞耗竭,2 名中有 2 名,11 名中有 4 名;P = .19;平均[SD]抗 DSG3 Abs 水平,103.5[61.5] AU/mL 比 19.5[11.0] AU/mL;P = .001),或无 ARAs 的患者(平均[SD]RTX 浓度,0ug/mL 比 13.5[1.8]ug/mL;P = .02;不完全 B 细胞耗竭,2 名中有 2 名,20 名中有 5 名;P = .09;平均[SD]抗 DSG3 Abs 水平,103.5[61.5] AU/mL 比 4.0[1.0] AU/mL;P < .001)。

结论和相关性

这项队列研究的结果表明,接受 RTX 治疗的天疱疮患者中经常检测到 ARAs,一般与患者结局无关。只有少数同时存在 ARAs、低 RTX 浓度、不完全 B 细胞耗竭和持续血清抗 DSG3 Abs 的患者似乎有很高的复发风险。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of Clinical Relevance and Biological Effects of Antirituximab Antibodies in Patients With Pemphigus.评价抗人 CD20 单克隆抗体在天疱疮患者中的临床相关性和生物学效应。
JAMA Dermatol. 2022 Aug 1;158(8):893-899. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2022.2149.
2
Factors Associated With Short-term Relapse in Patients With Pemphigus Who Receive Rituximab as First-line Therapy: A Post Hoc Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.接受利妥昔单抗作为一线治疗的天疱疮患者短期复发的相关因素:一项随机临床试验的事后分析。
JAMA Dermatol. 2020 May 1;156(5):545-552. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2020.0290.
3
A prospective study comparing patients with early and late relapsing pemphigus treated with rituximab.一项比较利妥昔单抗治疗早期和晚期复发天疱疮患者的前瞻性研究。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2018 Jul;79(1):97-103. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2018.01.029. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
4
Rituximab and low dose oral immune modulating treatment to maintain a sustained response in severe pemphigus patients.利妥昔单抗和低剂量口服免疫调节治疗维持重症天疱疮患者的持续缓解。
J Dermatolog Treat. 2019 Jun;30(4):340-345. doi: 10.1080/09546634.2018.1510173. Epub 2018 Sep 7.
5
The use of rituximab as an adjuvant in the treatment of oral pemphigus vulgaris.利妥昔单抗作为辅助治疗寻常型天疱疮的应用。
J Oral Pathol Med. 2020 Jan;49(1):91-95. doi: 10.1111/jop.12951. Epub 2019 Sep 6.
6
Rituximab treatment of severe pemphigus: long-term results including immunologic follow-up.利妥昔单抗治疗重症天疱疮:长期疗效包括免疫学随访。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2012 Oct;67(4):623-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2011.12.019. Epub 2012 Jan 20.
7
Sustained Remission Without Corticosteroids Among Patients With Pemphigus Who Had Rituximab as First-Line Therapy: Follow-Up of the Ritux 3 Trial.在利妥昔单抗作为一线治疗的天疱疮患者中,无皮质类固醇的持续缓解:Ritux 3 试验的随访。
JAMA Dermatol. 2024 Mar 1;160(3):290-296. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2023.5679.
8
ELISA testing of anti-desmoglein 1 and 3 antibodies in the management of pemphigus.在天疱疮治疗中抗桥粒芯糖蛋白1和3抗体的酶联免疫吸附测定检测
Arch Dermatol. 2009 May;145(5):529-35. doi: 10.1001/archdermatol.2009.9.
9
Correlation of anti-γ/ε nicotinic acetylcholine receptor antibody levels with anti-desmoglein 1,3 antibody levels and disease severity in pemphigus vulgaris.寻常型天疱疮中抗 γ/ε 烟碱型乙酰胆碱受体抗体水平与抗桥粒芯糖蛋白 1、3 抗体水平和疾病严重程度的相关性。
Clin Exp Dermatol. 2021 Oct;46(7):1230-1235. doi: 10.1111/ced.14645. Epub 2021 May 11.
10
Maintenance treatment of pemphigus with rituximab in real life: A single-center study of 50 patients.在现实生活中用利妥昔单抗治疗天疱疮的维持治疗:50 例患者的单中心研究。
Ann Dermatol Venereol. 2024 Jun;151(2):103264. doi: 10.1016/j.annder.2024.103264. Epub 2024 Mar 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Obinutuzumab and Ofatumumab are More Effective Than Rituximab in the Treatment of Membranous Nephropathy Patients With Anti-Rituximab Antibodies.奥妥珠单抗和奥法木单抗在治疗伴有抗利妥昔单抗抗体的膜性肾病患者方面比利妥昔单抗更有效。
Kidney Int Rep. 2024 Dec 17;10(3):753-761. doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2024.12.012. eCollection 2025 Mar.
2
Comparability of Randomized Controlled Trials Evaluating Pharmacological Interventions for Pemphigus Vulgaris and Pemphigus Foliaceus: A Systematic Mapping Review.评估寻常型天疱疮和落叶型天疱疮药物干预的随机对照试验的可比性:一项系统映射综述。
Adv Ther. 2025 Apr;42(4):1642-1691. doi: 10.1007/s12325-025-03118-6. Epub 2025 Feb 28.
3
Targeting therapy in pemphigus: Where are we now and where are we going?天疱疮的靶向治疗:我们目前的状况及未来走向?
Heliyon. 2023 May 25;9(6):e16679. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16679. eCollection 2023 Jun.