Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas, USA.
Departamento Acadêmico de Química e Biologia, Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil.
J Comput Chem. 2022 Aug 15;43(22):1484-1494. doi: 10.1002/jcc.26951. Epub 2022 Jun 22.
In the present study, the differential scattering cross-sections, depolarization ratios and Raman shifts of small molecular systems are obtained from configuration iteration wave functions of vibrational self-consistent field (VSCF) states. The transition polarizabilities were modeled using the Placzek approximation, neglecting those contributions not arising from the electric dipole mechanism. This theoretical approach is considered a good approximation for samples that absorb in the UV range if the excitation radiation falls in the visible region, as is the case of the molecules selected for the present study, namely: water, methane, and acetylene. Potential energy and electronic polarizability surfaces are calculated by the CCSD(T) and CC3 methods with aug-cc-p(C)V(T,Q,5)Z basis sets. The vibrational Hamiltonian includes the vibrational angular momentum contribution of the Watson kinetic energy operator. As expected, due to the variational nature of the VSCF and vibrational configuration interaction (VCI) methods, the Raman transition wavenumbers are substantially improved over the harmonic predictions. Surprisingly, the scattering cross-sections obtained using the harmonic approximation or the VSCF method better agrees with the experimental values than those cross-sections predicted using VCI wave functions. The more significant deviations of the VCI results from the experimental reference may be related to the significant uncertainties of the measured cross-sections. Still, it may also indicate that the VCI Raman transition moments may require a more accurate description of the electronic polarizability surface. Finally, the depolarization ratios calculated for H O and C D using harmonic and VCI wave functions have similar accuracy, whereas, for C H and C HD, the VCI results are more accurate.
在本研究中,从振动自洽场(VSCF)态的构型迭代波函数中获得小分子系统的差分散射截面、退偏比和拉曼位移。采用 Placzek 近似法对跃迁极化率进行建模,忽略了那些不源于电偶极机制的贡献。如果激发辐射落在可见区域,而实验样品的吸收在紫外范围内,那么这种理论方法被认为是一个很好的近似,对于本次研究中选择的分子,即水、甲烷和乙炔,就是如此。通过 CCSD(T)和 CC3 方法以及 aug-cc-p(C)V(T,Q,5)Z 基组计算势能和电子极化率表面。振动哈密顿量包括 Watson 动能算子的振动角动量贡献。正如预期的那样,由于 VSCF 和振动组态相互作用(VCI)方法的变分性质,拉曼跃迁波数与谐波预测相比有了很大的提高。令人惊讶的是,使用谐波近似或 VSCF 方法获得的散射截面比使用 VCI 波函数预测的截面更符合实验值。VCI 结果与实验参考值的较大偏差可能与测量截面的显著不确定性有关。尽管如此,这也可能表明 VCI 拉曼跃迁矩可能需要更准确地描述电子极化率表面。最后,使用谐波和 VCI 波函数计算的 H 2 O 和 CD 的退偏比具有相似的精度,而对于 CH 和 C 2 HD,VCI 结果更准确。