Suppr超能文献

土耳其医学论文中伦理保护报告质量的批判性评估

A Critical Assessment of the Quality of Reporting of Ethical Protections in Medical Papers Published in Turkey.

机构信息

Department of Medical History and Ethics, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, 37516Istanbul University.

出版信息

J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2022 Oct;17(4):504-514. doi: 10.1177/15562646221108600. Epub 2022 Jun 22.

Abstract

The Declaration of Helsinki (DoH), the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommendations, and the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) guidelines outline the basic principles for ethical conduct and publication of human-subject research, most notably informed consent (IC) and research ethics committee (REC) approval. This retrospective observational study was a first study to investigate the quality of reporting of these protections in a selected sample of medical papers published in Turkey. A total of 573 research articles published in the official journals of six leading Turkish medical schools between January 2018 and December 2020 were searched for information on obtaining (i) REC approval, (ii) written IC from research subjects or their legal guardians/representatives, and (iii) an REC-granted IC waiver when it was found, as stated in the DoH, "impossible or impracticable to obtain consent" from research subjects. Similarly, a total of 166 case reports were searched for a statement about publication-specific IC, as was recommended by COPE. Despite a statistically significant improvement over the years, the overall rates were found to be unsatisfactory. The protections were particularly misused or underused in retrospective research, where the rates of reporting written IC (15.41% vs. 48.61%) and REC approval with date and reference number information (45.38% vs. 61.11%) were significantly lower than in prospective research ( < .05). Both the practices of seeking and granting an IC waiver when no IC was obtained were extremely rare (n = 3). It was also found that the requirement of structured ethical information in research papers was associated with higher levels of ethics compliance, and that medical publishing in Turkey needed specific improvements, including better implementation of the protections already adopted in principle, clearer instructions for authors, more rigorous editorial scrutiny, and greater commitment to rejecting substandard submissions.

摘要

《赫尔辛基宣言》(DoH)、国际医学期刊编辑委员会(ICMJE)建议和出版伦理委员会(COPE)准则概述了人类受试者研究的伦理行为和出版的基本原则,尤其是知情同意(IC)和研究伦理委员会(REC)批准。这项回顾性观察研究首次调查了在土耳其选定的医学论文样本中这些保护措施的报告质量。在 2018 年 1 月至 2020 年 12 月期间,在六所土耳其领先医学院的官方期刊上发表的 573 篇研究文章中搜索了有关以下信息的信息:(i)获得 REC 批准,(ii)从研究对象或其法定监护人/代表处获得书面 IC,以及(iii)在《宣言》中规定的情况下,当从研究对象获得同意“不可能或不可行”时,获得 REC 授予的 IC 豁免。同样,在总共 166 例病例报告中搜索了 COPE 建议的关于特定于出版物的 IC 的声明。尽管近年来有了统计学上的显著改善,但总体比率仍不尽如人意。在回顾性研究中,特别是在使用或未使用保护措施的情况下,报告书面 IC(15.41%比 48.61%)和带有日期和参考编号信息的 REC 批准(45.38%比 61.11%)的比率明显低于前瞻性研究( < .05)。在没有获得 IC 的情况下寻求和授予 IC 豁免的做法都极为罕见(n = 3)。还发现,研究论文中需要结构化伦理信息的要求与更高水平的道德合规性相关,并且土耳其的医学出版需要进行具体改进,包括更好地实施已原则上采用的保护措施,为作者提供更明确的说明,更严格的编辑审查以及更大的承诺拒绝不合格的提交。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验