Department of Surgical Gastroenterology , Hvidovre University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Department of Surgical Gastroenterology , Hvidovre University Hospital , Copenhagen, Denmark.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jun 22;6(6):CD009092. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009092.pub3.
Diverticulitis is a complication of the common condition, diverticulosis. Uncomplicated diverticulitis has traditionally been treated with antibiotics, as diverticulitis has been regarded as an infectious disease. Risk factors for diverticulitis, however, may suggest that the condition is inflammatory rather than infectious which makes the use of antibiotics questionable.
The objectives of this systematic review were to determine if antibiotic treatment of uncomplicated acute diverticulitis affects the risk of complications (immediate or late) or the need for emergency surgery.
For this update, a comprehensive systematic literature search was conducted in Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase, ClinicalTrials.gov and WHO International Clinical Trial Registry Platform on February 2021.
Randomised controlled trials (RCTs), including all types of patients with a radiologically confirmed diagnosis of left-sided uncomplicated acute diverticulitis. Comparator and interventions included antibiotics compared to no antibiotics, placebo, or to any other antibiotic treatment (different regimens, routes of administration, dosage or duration of treatment). Primary outcome measures were complications and emergency surgery. Secondary outcomes were recurrence, late complications, elective colonic resections, length of hospital stay, length to recovery of symptoms, adverse events and mortality.
Two authors performed the searches, identification and assessment of RCTs and data extraction. Disagreements were resolved by discussion or involvement of the third author. Authors of trials were contacted to obtain additional data if needed or for preliminary results of ongoing trials. The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias was used to assess the methodological quality of the identified trials. The overall quality of evidence for outcomes was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Effect estimates were extracted as risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed with the Mantel-Haenzel method.
The authors included five studies. Three studies compared no antibiotics to antibiotics; all three were original RCTs of which two also published long-term follow-up information. For the outcome of short-term complications there may be little or no difference between antibiotics and no antibiotics (RR 0.89; 95% CI 0.30 to 2.62; 3 studies, 1329 participants; low-certainty evidence). The rate of emergency surgery within 30 days may be lower with no antibiotics compared to antibiotics (RR 0.47; 95% CI 0.13, 1.71; 1329 participants; 3 studies; low-certainty evidence). However, there is considerable imprecision due to wide confidence intervals for this effect estimate causing uncertainty which means that there may also be a benefit with antibiotics. One of the two remaining trials compared single to double compound antibiotic therapy and, due to wide confidence intervals, the estimate was imprecise and indicated an uncertain clinical effect between these two antibiotic regimens (RR 0.70; 95% CI 0.11 to 4.58; 51 participants; 1 study; low-certainty evidence). The last trial compared short to long intravenous administration of antibiotics and did not report any events for our primary outcomes. Both trials included few participants and one had overall high risk of bias. Since the first publication of this systematic review, an increasing amount of evidence supporting the treatment of uncomplicated acute diverticulitis without antibiotics has been published, but the total body of evidence is still limited.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The evidence on antibiotic treatment for uncomplicated acute diverticulitis suggests that the effect of antibiotics is uncertain for complications, emergency surgery, recurrence, elective colonic resections, and long-term complications. The quality of the evidence is low. Only three RCTs on the need for antibiotics are currently available. More trials are needed to obtain more precise effect estimates.
憩室炎是一种常见疾病憩室病的并发症。传统上,单纯性憩室炎采用抗生素治疗,因为憩室炎被认为是一种传染病。然而,憩室炎的危险因素可能表明该病是炎症性的而不是感染性的,这使得抗生素的使用受到质疑。
本系统评价的目的是确定单纯性急性憩室炎的抗生素治疗是否会影响并发症(即刻或迟发)或急诊手术的风险。
在 2021 年 2 月,我们对 Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库(CENTRAL)、MEDLINE、Embase、ClinicalTrials.gov 和世卫组织国际临床试验注册平台进行了全面的系统文献检索。
随机对照试验(RCT),包括所有经放射学证实的左侧单纯性急性憩室炎患者。比较和干预措施包括抗生素与无抗生素、安慰剂或任何其他抗生素治疗(不同方案、给药途径、剂量或治疗持续时间)。主要结局指标是并发症和急诊手术。次要结局是复发、迟发性并发症、择期结肠切除术、住院时间、症状恢复时间、不良事件和死亡率。
两位作者进行了检索、确定和评估 RCT 并提取数据。通过讨论或第三位作者的参与解决了分歧。如果需要或为正在进行的试验的初步结果,与试验作者联系以获取额外的数据。使用 Cochrane 协作组评估偏倚风险的工具来评估确定试验的方法学质量。使用推荐评估、制定和评价(GRADE)方法评估结局的总体证据质量。使用 Mantel-Haenzel 法提取风险比(RR)及其 95%置信区间。
作者纳入了五项研究。三项研究比较了无抗生素与抗生素;所有三项研究均为原始 RCT,其中两项也发表了长期随访信息。对于短期并发症的结局,无抗生素与抗生素之间可能没有或仅有少量差异(RR 0.89;95%CI 0.30 至 2.62;3 项研究,1329 名参与者;低质量证据)。与抗生素相比,无抗生素治疗 30 天内急诊手术的可能性较低(RR 0.47;95%CI 0.13 至 1.71;1329 名参与者;3 项研究;低质量证据)。然而,由于置信区间较宽,这种效果估计的精度较低,存在不确定性,这意味着抗生素也可能有获益。剩下的两项试验中的一项比较了单一和双重复合抗生素治疗,由于置信区间较宽,估计值不精确,表明这两种抗生素方案之间的临床效果不确定(RR 0.70;95%CI 0.11 至 4.58;51 名参与者;1 项研究;低质量证据)。最后一项试验比较了短时间和长时间静脉内使用抗生素,没有报告我们主要结局的任何事件。这两项试验都纳入了很少的参与者,其中一项的总体偏倚风险较高。自本系统评价首次发表以来,越来越多的证据支持不使用抗生素治疗单纯性急性憩室炎,但证据总量仍然有限。
关于单纯性急性憩室炎抗生素治疗的证据表明,抗生素对并发症、急诊手术、复发、择期结肠切除术和长期并发症的影响不确定。证据质量低。目前仅有三项 RCT 涉及抗生素的必要性。需要更多的试验来获得更精确的效果估计。