Poel Winnie, Daniels Bryan C, Sosna Matthew M G, Twomey Colin R, Leblanc Simon P, Couzin Iain D, Romanczuk Pawel
Institute for Theoretical Biology, Department of Biology, Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, D-10099 Berlin, Germany.
Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience Berlin, D-10115 Berlin, Germany.
Sci Adv. 2022 Jun 24;8(25):eabm6385. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abm6385. Epub 2022 Jun 22.
Theoretical physics predicts optimal information processing in living systems near transitions (or pseudo-critical points) in their collective dynamics. However, focusing on potential benefits of proximity to a critical point, such as maximal sensitivity to perturbations and fast dissemination of information, commonly disregards possible costs of criticality in the noisy, dynamic environmental contexts of biological systems. Here, we find that startle cascades in fish schools are subcritical (not maximally responsive to environmental cues) and that distance to criticality decreases when perceived risk increases. Considering individuals' costs related to two detection error types, associated to both true and false alarms, we argue that being subcritical, and modulating distance to criticality, can be understood as managing a trade-off between sensitivity and robustness according to the riskiness and noisiness of the environment. Our work emphasizes the need for an individual-based and context-dependent perspective on criticality and collective information processing and motivates future questions about the evolutionary forces that brought about a particular trade-off.
理论物理学预测,生物系统在其集体动力学的转变(或伪临界点)附近能够实现最优信息处理。然而,专注于接近临界点的潜在益处,比如对扰动的最大敏感性和信息的快速传播,通常会忽视在生物系统嘈杂、动态的环境背景下临界状态可能带来的成本。在此,我们发现鱼群中的惊吓级联是亚临界的(对环境线索没有最大反应),并且当感知到的风险增加时,与临界状态的距离会减小。考虑到个体与两种检测错误类型相关的成本,这两种错误类型分别与误报和漏报有关,我们认为处于亚临界状态以及调节与临界状态的距离,可以理解为根据环境的风险程度和噪声水平在敏感性和稳健性之间进行权衡。我们的研究强调了对临界状态和集体信息处理需要基于个体且依赖于具体情境的视角,并引发了关于导致特定权衡的进化力量的未来问题。