Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Department of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Nat Commun. 2022 Jun 22;13(1):3567. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-30971-8.
Humans, and many other species, are host to diverse symbionts. It is often suggested that the mutual benefits of host-microbe relationships can alone explain cooperative evolution. Here, we evaluate this hypothesis with evolutionary modelling. Our model predicts that mutual benefits are insufficient to drive cooperation in systems like the human microbiome, because of competition between symbionts. However, cooperation can emerge if hosts can exert control over symbionts, so long as there are constraints that limit symbiont counter evolution. We test our model with genomic data of two bacterial traits monitored by animal immune systems. In both cases, bacteria have evolved as predicted under host control, tending to lose flagella and maintain butyrate production when host-associated. Moreover, an analysis of bacteria that retain flagella supports the evolution of host control, via toll-like receptor 5, which limits symbiont counter evolution. Our work puts host control mechanisms, including the immune system, at the centre of microbiome evolution.
人类和许多其他物种都是多种共生体的宿主。人们常常认为,宿主-微生物关系的互利互惠足以单独解释共生体的协同进化。在这里,我们通过进化建模来评估这一假设。我们的模型预测,由于共生体之间的竞争,互利互惠不足以驱动人类微生物组等系统中的合作。然而,如果宿主可以对共生体施加控制,并且存在限制共生体反进化的约束,那么合作就可以出现。我们使用动物免疫系统监测的两种细菌特征的基因组数据来测试我们的模型。在这两种情况下,细菌的进化都如宿主控制所预测的那样,当与宿主相关时,往往会失去鞭毛并保持丁酸产生。此外,对保留鞭毛的细菌的分析支持通过限制共生体反进化的 toll 样受体 5 进行宿主控制的进化。我们的工作将包括免疫系统在内的宿主控制机制置于微生物组进化的中心。