• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

特质性抑郁的中国大学生对英文情绪词加工的语义-韵律Stroop效应

Semantics-Prosody Stroop Effect on English Emotion Word Processing in Chinese College Students With Trait Depression.

作者信息

Chen Fei, Lian Jing, Zhang Gaode, Guo Chengyu

机构信息

School of Foreign Languages, Hunan University, Changsha, China.

出版信息

Front Psychiatry. 2022 Jun 6;13:889476. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.889476. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyt.2022.889476
PMID:35733799
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9207235/
Abstract

This study explored the performance of Chinese college students with different severity of trait depression to process English emotional speech under a complete semantics-prosody Stroop effect paradigm in quiet and noisy conditions. A total of 24 college students with high-trait depression and 24 students with low-trait depression participated in this study. They were required to selectively attend to either the prosodic emotion (happy, sad) or semantic valence (positive and negative) of the English words they heard and then respond quickly. Both prosody task and semantic task were performed in quiet and noisy listening conditions. Results showed that the high-trait group reacted slower than the low-trait group in the prosody task due to their bluntness and insensitivity toward emotional processing. Besides, both groups reacted faster under the consistent situation, showing a clear congruency-induced facilitation effect and the wide existence of the Stroop effect in both tasks. Only the Stroop effect played a bigger role during emotional prosody identification in quiet condition, and the noise eliminated such an effect. For the sake of experimental design, both groups spent less time on the prosody task than the semantic task regardless of consistency in all listening conditions, indicating the friendliness of basic emotion identification and the difficulty for second language learners in face of semantic judgment. These findings suggest the unneglectable effects of college students' mood conditions and noise outside on emotion word processing.

摘要

本研究在完全语义-韵律斯特鲁普效应范式下,探究了不同特质抑郁严重程度的中国大学生在安静和嘈杂条件下处理英语情感语音的表现。共有24名高特质抑郁大学生和24名低特质抑郁大学生参与了本研究。他们被要求选择性地关注所听到英语单词的韵律情感(快乐、悲伤)或语义效价(积极和消极),然后迅速做出反应。韵律任务和语义任务均在安静和嘈杂的聆听条件下进行。结果表明,高特质组在韵律任务中的反应比低特质组慢,因为他们对情感处理迟钝且不敏感。此外,两组在一致情境下的反应都更快,在两项任务中均表现出明显的一致性诱导促进效应和斯特鲁普效应的广泛存在。只有在安静条件下的情感韵律识别过程中,斯特鲁普效应发挥了更大作用,而噪音消除了这种效应。出于实验设计的考虑,无论所有聆听条件下的一致性如何,两组在韵律任务上花费的时间都比语义任务少,这表明基本情感识别的友好性以及第二语言学习者面对语义判断时的困难。这些发现表明,大学生的情绪状况和外界噪音对情感词汇处理有着不可忽视的影响。

相似文献

1
Semantics-Prosody Stroop Effect on English Emotion Word Processing in Chinese College Students With Trait Depression.特质性抑郁的中国大学生对英文情绪词加工的语义-韵律Stroop效应
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Jun 6;13:889476. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.889476. eCollection 2022.
2
Prosody Dominates Over Semantics in Emotion Word Processing: Evidence From Cross-Channel and Cross-Modal Stroop Effects.韵律在情绪词汇加工中占据主导地位:来自跨通道和跨模态斯特鲁普效应的证据。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2020 Mar 23;63(3):896-912. doi: 10.1044/2020_JSLHR-19-00258. Epub 2020 Mar 18.
3
ERP evidence for a sex-specific Stroop effect in emotional speech.事件相关电位(ERP)证据表明情绪性言语中存在性别特异性的斯特鲁普效应。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2003 Nov 15;15(8):1135-48. doi: 10.1162/089892903322598102.
4
More than words (and faces): evidence for a Stroop effect of prosody in emotion word processing.不止于言语(和面孔):情绪词汇加工中韵律的斯特鲁普效应证据
Cogn Emot. 2017 Aug;31(5):879-891. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2016.1177489. Epub 2016 May 3.
5
Recognition of Emotional Prosody in Mandarin-Speaking Children: Effects of Age, Noise, and Working Memory.普通话儿童情绪韵律的识别:年龄、噪声和工作记忆的影响。
J Psycholinguist Res. 2024 Aug 24;53(5):68. doi: 10.1007/s10936-024-10108-2.
6
Emotional prosody Stroop effect in Hindi: An event related potential study.印地语情绪韵律 Stroop 效应:一项事件相关电位研究。
Prog Brain Res. 2019;247:193-217. doi: 10.1016/bs.pbr.2019.04.003. Epub 2019 May 2.
7
Emotional speech processing: disentangling the effects of prosody and semantic cues.情感言语处理:剖析韵律和语义线索的影响。
Cogn Emot. 2011 Aug;25(5):834-53. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2010.516915. Epub 2011 May 24.
8
Emotional language is all right: Emotional prosody reduces hemispheric asymmetry for linguistic processing.情感语言是可以的:情感韵律减少了语言处理中的半球不对称性。
Laterality. 2016 Jul-Nov;21(4-6):568-584. doi: 10.1080/1357650X.2015.1096940. Epub 2015 Oct 27.
9
Semantic effects on the perception of emotional prosody in native and non-native Chinese speakers.语义对以中文为母语者和非中文母语者情感韵律感知的影响。
Cogn Emot. 2024 Jul 7:1-11. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2024.2371088.
10
Neural evidence for reduced automaticity in processing emotional prosody among men with high levels of autistic traits.具有高度自闭症特质的男性在处理情感韵律时自动性降低的神经证据。
Physiol Behav. 2018 Nov 1;196:47-58. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2018.08.014. Epub 2018 Aug 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Improvements in depression symptomatology in a sample of undergraduate students: a pre-post Balint group intervention study.一组本科生样本中抑郁症状的改善:巴林特小组干预前后对照研究。
BMC Psychol. 2025 Aug 13;13(1):913. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-03226-6.
2
Recognition of Emotional Prosody in Mandarin-Speaking Children: Effects of Age, Noise, and Working Memory.普通话儿童情绪韵律的识别:年龄、噪声和工作记忆的影响。
J Psycholinguist Res. 2024 Aug 24;53(5):68. doi: 10.1007/s10936-024-10108-2.

本文引用的文献

1
PET/CT background noise and its effect on speech recognition.PET/CT 背景噪声及其对语音识别的影响。
Sci Rep. 2021 Nov 11;11(1):22065. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-01686-5.
2
Facial emotion recognition in major depressive disorder: A meta-analytic review.重度抑郁症的面部情绪识别:一项荟萃分析综述。
J Affect Disord. 2021 Oct 1;293:320-328. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.06.053. Epub 2021 Jun 26.
3
Emotional prosody recognition in children with high-functioning autism under the influence of emotional intensity: Based on the perspective of emotional dimension theory.
情绪强度影响下高功能自闭症儿童的情绪韵律识别:基于情绪维度理论的视角。
J Commun Disord. 2020 Nov-Dec;88:106032. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2020.106032. Epub 2020 Aug 17.
4
Prosody Dominates Over Semantics in Emotion Word Processing: Evidence From Cross-Channel and Cross-Modal Stroop Effects.韵律在情绪词汇加工中占据主导地位:来自跨通道和跨模态斯特鲁普效应的证据。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2020 Mar 23;63(3):896-912. doi: 10.1044/2020_JSLHR-19-00258. Epub 2020 Mar 18.
5
Coping with adversity: Individual differences in the perception of noisy and accented speech.应对逆境:嘈杂和带口音语音感知中的个体差异。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2018 Aug;80(6):1559-1570. doi: 10.3758/s13414-018-1537-4.
6
Different patterns of modality dominance across development.发育过程中不同的模态优势模式。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2018 Jan;182:154-165. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.11.017.
7
The Humanizing Voice: Speech Reveals, and Text Conceals, a More Thoughtful Mind in the Midst of Disagreement.人性化的声音:在意见分歧中,语音揭示而文本隐藏了一个更具思考力的头脑。
Psychol Sci. 2017 Dec;28(12):1745-1762. doi: 10.1177/0956797617713798. Epub 2017 Oct 25.
8
Stuttering Thoughts: Negative Self-Referent Thinking Is Less Sensitive to Aversive Outcomes in People with Higher Levels of Depressive Symptoms.口吃的想法:消极的自我参照思维对抑郁症状较严重的人的厌恶结果不太敏感。
Front Psychol. 2017 Aug 2;8:1333. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01333. eCollection 2017.
9
More than words (and faces): evidence for a Stroop effect of prosody in emotion word processing.不止于言语(和面孔):情绪词汇加工中韵律的斯特鲁普效应证据
Cogn Emot. 2017 Aug;31(5):879-891. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2016.1177489. Epub 2016 May 3.
10
Is self-positive information more appealing than money? Individual differences in positivity bias according to depressive symptoms.自我积极信息比金钱更有吸引力吗?根据抑郁症状的积极偏差个体差异。
Cogn Emot. 2016 Dec;30(8):1402-1414. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2015.1068162. Epub 2015 Jul 29.