Zullo Lucas, Grzenda Adrienne, Vargas Sylvanna M, Miranda Jeanne
Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles (all authors); Olive View-UCLA Medical Center, Sylmar, California (Grzenda); Departments of Psychology and Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles (Vargas).
Psychiatr Serv. 2022 Dec 1;73(12):1352-1358. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.202100059. Epub 2022 Jun 23.
This study aimed to use a large population-based sample to investigate age-associated differences in mental distress among sexual and gender minority (SGM) adults compared with their heterosexual, cisgender counterparts.
Data were pooled from five cycles (2014-2018) of the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) survey (N=762,541) and included states that administered the optional SGM module during that interval. Mean days of self-reported mental distress and the rate of frequent mental distress (≥14 days of mental distress per month) were calculated for each age and SGM identity stratum by using linear and logistic regression, respectively. Models controlled for socioeconomic factors and medical comorbid conditions. All analyses accounted for the complex survey design of the BRFSS.
Among those ages 18-24 years, mean days of mental distress and the rate of frequent mental distress were significantly higher for SGM subgroups compared with cisgender, heterosexual adults. Among those ages 45-54, 55-64, or ≥65, no differences were noted between SGM groups and their cisgender, heterosexual peers.
Younger SGM respondents reported the highest levels of mental distress. Differences in general mental distress were less detectable with increasing age. The findings suggest that SGM young adults have an increased need for mental health services.
本研究旨在利用一个基于大量人群的样本,调查性少数和性别少数(SGM)成年人与异性恋、顺性别成年人相比,在心理困扰方面与年龄相关的差异。
数据来自行为危险因素监测系统(BRFSS)调查的五个周期(2014 - 2018年)(N = 762,541),包括在该时间段内实施了可选SGM模块的州。通过线性回归和逻辑回归分别计算每个年龄和SGM身份阶层自我报告的心理困扰平均天数和频繁心理困扰率(每月≥14天心理困扰)。模型对社会经济因素和医疗合并症进行了控制。所有分析都考虑了BRFSS的复杂调查设计。
在18 - 24岁人群中,SGM亚组的心理困扰平均天数和频繁心理困扰率显著高于顺性别、异性恋成年人。在45 - 54岁、55 - 64岁或≥65岁人群中,SGM组与其顺性别、异性恋同龄人之间未发现差异。
年轻的SGM受访者报告的心理困扰水平最高。随着年龄增长,一般心理困扰的差异不太明显。研究结果表明,SGM青年对心理健康服务的需求增加。