Suppr超能文献

可调环植入物在在前交叉韧带重建中股骨固定方面不劣于固定环植入物。

Adjustable-loop implants are non-inferior to fixed-loop implants for femoral fixation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, 8200, Aarhus N, Denmark.

出版信息

Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023 May;31(5):1723-1732. doi: 10.1007/s00167-022-07034-y. Epub 2022 Jun 23.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Button implants with an adjustable-loop device (ALD) are often used in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Clinical research comparing ALDs with fixed-loop devices (FLD) has mainly been conducted in small patient populations with short follow-up times. To determine whether ALDs are safe to use in ACLR, a non-inferiority study with a large sample population and a long follow-up period would be beneficial. This study compared ALDs with FLDs to determine non-inferior revision surgery rates, knee stability, and patient-reported outcomes (PROM) in ACLRs.

METHODS

This non-inferiority register-based cohort study was conducted using data from the Danish Knee Ligament Reconstruction Registry (DKRR). A total of 12,723 patients > 15 years of age with primary ACLR using hamstring tendon autografts and either an FLD or ALD for femoral fixation were included: 9719 patients were in the FLD group, and 3014 patients were in the ALD group. The primary outcome was revision ACLR with a non-inferiority margin for ALDs at 4% at the 2-year follow-up. The secondary outcomes were anterior and rotatory knee stability and PROMs based on the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) at the 1-year follow-up.

RESULTS

The crude cumulative revision rates in ALD implants at 2 and 5 years were 2.1% (95% CI 1.62-2.68) and 5.0% (95% CI 4.22-5.96), respectively. In the FLD group, the rates were 2.2% (95% CI 1.89-2.48) at 2 years and 4.7% (95% CI 4.31-5.20) at 5 years. The 1-year side-to-side differences were 0.97 mm (95% CI 0.90-1.03) in the ALD group and 1.45 mm (95% CI 1.41-1.49) in the FLD group. In the FLD group, 13% had a positive pivot shift, and in the ALD group, 6% had a positive pivot shift. There were no differences in KOOS.

CONCLUSION

ALDs were non-inferior to FLDs regarding revision rates, knee stability, and patient-reported outcomes. Based on this conclusion, ALDs are safe to use for femoral fixation in ACLR.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

摘要

目的

在前交叉韧带重建(ACLR)中,常使用带有可调环装置(ALD)的纽扣植入物。比较ALD 与固定环装置(FLD)的临床研究主要在随访时间较短的小患者人群中进行。为了确定 ALD 在 ACLR 中使用是否安全,一项具有大样本量和长随访期的非劣效性研究将是有益的。本研究比较了 ALD 与 FLD,以确定 ACLR 中翻修手术率、膝关节稳定性和患者报告的结果(PROM)是否非劣效。

方法

本项非劣效性基于注册的队列研究使用了丹麦膝关节韧带重建登记处(DKRR)的数据。共纳入 12723 名年龄>15 岁、使用自体腘绳肌腱进行初次 ACLR 的患者,其中 9719 名患者使用 FLD,3014 名患者使用 ALD 进行股骨固定:FLD 组中,9719 名患者中有 2.1%(95%置信区间 1.62-2.68)在第 2 年随访时进行了非劣效性修订 ACLR,ALD 组中,5.0%(95%置信区间 4.22-5.96)在第 2 年随访时进行了非劣效性修订 ACLR;FLD 组中,2.2%(95%置信区间 1.89-2.48)在第 2 年随访时进行了非劣效性修订 ACLR,5.0%(95%置信区间 4.31-5.20)在第 5 年随访时进行了非劣效性修订 ACLR。在 ALD 组中,1 年的侧间差值为 0.97mm(95%置信区间 0.90-1.03),在 FLD 组中为 1.45mm(95%置信区间 1.41-1.49)。在 FLD 组中,有 13%的患者出现前抽屉试验阳性,而在 ALD 组中,有 6%的患者出现前抽屉试验阳性。两组患者 KOOS 评分无差异。

结论

ALD 与 FLD 相比,在翻修率、膝关节稳定性和患者报告的结果方面无差异。基于这一结论,ALD 用于 ACLR 股骨固定是安全的。

证据水平

III 级。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验