Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine.
Psychol Serv. 2023;20(Suppl 2):122-129. doi: 10.1037/ser0000686. Epub 2022 Jun 23.
A plethora of research highlights the effectiveness of dialectical behavioral therapy (DBT) in improving emotion regulation and psychological functioning transdiagnostically. However, the majority of this research has focused on women, and the limited existing research on men has concentrated on high acuity patients in forensic and inpatient settings. The present study examined the effectiveness of DBT skills groups in reducing emotion regulation difficulties in a transdiagnostic sample of adult men in a university-based clinical outpatient setting using a naturalistic design. Sixteen adult male patients completed self-report measures examining emotion regulation difficulties (Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale) at intake and following one 12-week module of DBT skills group. Men showed a significant reduction in overall difficulty regulating emotions with a moderate effect size (d = 0.63, p < .05) following one module of DBT skills group, which were accounted for primarily by improvements on the impulse control difficulties subscale ( = 1.06, < .01). In comparison, women ( = 82) showed significant improvements in global emotion regulation difficulties ( = 0.71, < .01), with marked improvement across all six subscales. Implications of findings for the application of DBT for men in outpatient settings is discussed, limitations reviewed, and areas for future research suggested. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).
大量研究强调了辩证行为疗法(DBT)在改善跨诊断情绪调节和心理功能方面的有效性。然而,大多数此类研究都集中在女性身上,而关于男性的有限现有研究则集中在法医学和住院环境中的高敏患者身上。本研究采用自然主义设计,在基于大学的临床门诊环境中,对成年男性进行了跨诊断样本的 DBT 技能组研究,以检验 DBT 技能组在减少成年男性情绪调节困难方面的有效性。16 名成年男性患者在接受 DBT 技能组 12 周模块治疗前后,通过自我报告量表评估情绪调节困难(情绪调节困难量表)。在接受了一个 DBT 技能组模块治疗后,男性在整体情绪调节困难方面有显著减少,具有中等效果大小(d = 0.63,p <.05),主要归因于冲动控制困难子量表的改善( = 1.06, <.01)。相比之下,女性( = 82)在全球情绪调节困难方面有显著改善( = 0.71,<.01),所有六个子量表都有明显改善。讨论了在门诊环境中为男性应用 DBT 的意义,回顾了局限性,并提出了未来研究的方向。(心理学信息数据库记录(c)2023 APA,保留所有权利)。