Tella Sri Harsha, Kommalapati Anuhya, Mahipal Amit, Jin Zhaohui
Department of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Biomedicines. 2022 Jun 2;10(6):1304. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines10061304.
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is an aggressive malignancy accounting for 90% of primary liver malignancies. Therapeutic options for HCC are primarily based on the baseline functional status, the extent of disease at presentation and the underlying liver function that is clinically evaluated by the Barcelona-Clinic Liver Cancer system and Child−Pugh score. In patients with advanced HCC, the United States Food and Drug Administration (US-FDA) approved systemic therapies include the combination of atezolizumab−bevacizumab, sorafenib, and lenvatinib in the first line setting while cabozantinib, regorafenib, ramucirumab (in patients with alfa-fetoprotein [AFP] > 400 ng/mL), pembrolizumab, nivolumab, and nivolumab-ipilimumab combination are reserved for patients who progressed on sorafenib. European Medical Agency (EMA) approved the use of atezolizumab−bevacizumab, sorafenib, and lenvatinib in the first line setting, while cabozantinib, regorafenib, and ramucirumab (in patients with alfa-fetoprotein [AFP] > 400 ng/mL) are approved for use in patients that progressed on first-line therapy. In the first line setting, sorafenib demonstrated a median overall survival (OS) benefit of 3 months as compared to that of best supportive care in randomized phase III trials, while lenvatinib was shown to be non-inferior to sorafenib. Recently, phase 3 studies with immunotherapeutic agents including atezolizumab plus a bevacizumab combination and tremelimumab plus durvalumab combination demonstrated a better OS and progression free survival (PFS) compared to sorafenib in the first-line setting, making them attractive first-line options in advanced HCC. In this review, we outlined the tumorigenesis and immune landscape of HCC in brief and discussed the role and rationale of combining immunotherapy and anti-VEGF therapy. We further expanded on potential limitations and the future directions of immunotherapy in combination with targeted agents in the management of advanced HCC.
肝细胞癌(HCC)是一种侵袭性恶性肿瘤,占原发性肝脏恶性肿瘤的90%。HCC的治疗选择主要基于基线功能状态、就诊时疾病的范围以及潜在的肝功能,这些通过巴塞罗那临床肝癌系统和Child-Pugh评分进行临床评估。在晚期HCC患者中,美国食品药品监督管理局(US-FDA)批准的一线全身治疗药物包括阿替利珠单抗-贝伐珠单抗联合用药、索拉非尼和仑伐替尼;而卡博替尼、瑞戈非尼、雷莫西尤单抗(甲胎蛋白[AFP]>400 ng/mL的患者)、帕博利珠单抗、纳武利尤单抗以及纳武利尤单抗-伊匹木单抗联合用药则用于索拉非尼治疗进展的患者。欧洲药品管理局(EMA)批准一线使用阿替利珠单抗-贝伐珠单抗、索拉非尼和仑伐替尼,而卡博替尼、瑞戈非尼和雷莫西尤单抗(甲胎蛋白[AFP]>400 ng/mL的患者)被批准用于一线治疗进展的患者。在一线治疗中,随机III期试验显示,与最佳支持治疗相比,索拉非尼的中位总生存期(OS)获益为3个月,而仑伐替尼被证明不劣于索拉非尼。最近,包括阿替利珠单抗加贝伐珠单抗联合用药以及曲美木单抗加度伐利尤单抗联合用药在内的免疫治疗药物的3期研究表明,与一线使用索拉非尼相比,其OS和无进展生存期(PFS)更佳,使其成为晚期HCC有吸引力的一线选择。在本综述中,我们简要概述了HCC的肿瘤发生和免疫格局,并讨论了免疫治疗与抗VEGF治疗联合应用的作用和原理。我们还进一步阐述了免疫治疗联合靶向药物在晚期HCC管理中的潜在局限性和未来方向。