C Zapico Sara, Ubelaker Douglas H
Department of Chemistry and Environmental Sciences, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Tiernan Hall 365, Newark, NJ 07102, USA.
Department of Anthropology, NMNH-MRC 112, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20560, USA.
Biology (Basel). 2022 Jun 3;11(6):856. doi: 10.3390/biology11060856.
Correct age-at-death estimation in adult individuals is one of the challenges of forensic investigation. Forensic anthropology macroscopic techniques are non-invasive methods for this purpose. However, several methods need to be applied to accurately estimate age, and the difference between chronological and predictive age may still be around ±10 years. New research trends are focused on the inherent process of aging, which produces changes in tissues and organs at different biochemical levels. One of the oldest and most studied approaches in this field is aspartic acid racemization. The accuracy of this technique in age estimation has been widely demonstrated. However, only a few studies have assessed its accuracy in different populations. The aim of this research was to assess the accuracy of aspartic acid racemization in a Spanish sample and its applicability to forensic cases. Dentin from fifteen third molars from two Spanish populations (ages 19-70 years old) was isolated and D and L forms of aspartic acid were detected through GC/MS, according to a previous published protocol. D/L ratios were calculated and after the application of a regression analysis, a formula for age estimation was developed. The results were similar to previous studies, obtaining an R = 0.91 between racemization ratios and age and a mean absolute error (MAE) between chronological and predictive age of 5 years. These results were ratified by leave-one-out cross-validation, as well as the application of the formula to five teeth of a known age. Despite these promising results, this technique is not exempt from drawbacks; thus, further studies are required to apply this methodology to forensic cases and to combine it with forensic anthropology findings.
在成年个体中准确估计死亡年龄是法医调查面临的挑战之一。法医人类学宏观技术是用于此目的的非侵入性方法。然而,需要应用多种方法来准确估计年龄,实际年龄与预测年龄之间的差异可能仍在±10岁左右。新的研究趋势聚焦于衰老的内在过程,这一过程会在不同生化水平上使组织和器官产生变化。该领域最古老且研究最多的方法之一是天冬氨酸消旋化。这项技术在年龄估计方面的准确性已得到广泛证明。然而,只有少数研究评估了其在不同人群中的准确性。本研究的目的是评估天冬氨酸消旋化在西班牙样本中的准确性及其在法医案件中的适用性。根据先前发表的方案,从两个西班牙人群(年龄在19 - 70岁之间)的15颗第三磨牙中分离出牙本质,并通过气相色谱/质谱法检测天冬氨酸的D型和L型。计算D/L比率,并在进行回归分析后,开发出一个年龄估计公式。结果与先前的研究相似,消旋化比率与年龄之间的R值为0.91,实际年龄与预测年龄之间的平均绝对误差(MAE)为5岁。这些结果通过留一法交叉验证以及将该公式应用于五颗已知年龄的牙齿得到了验证。尽管有这些令人鼓舞的结果,但这项技术并非没有缺点;因此,需要进一步研究将该方法应用于法医案件,并将其与法医人类学的发现相结合。