Suppr超能文献

应用人工智能方法预测掺F类粉煤灰自密实混凝土的抗压强度

Application of Artificial Intelligence Methods for Predicting the Compressive Strength of Self-Compacting Concrete with Class F Fly Ash.

作者信息

Kovačević Miljan, Lozančić Silva, Nyarko Emmanuel Karlo, Hadzima-Nyarko Marijana

机构信息

Faculty of Technical Sciences, University of Pristina, Knjaza Milosa 7, 38220 Kosovska Mitrovica, Serbia.

Faculty of Civil Engineering and Architecture Osijek, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Vladimira Preloga 3, 31000 Osijek, Croatia.

出版信息

Materials (Basel). 2022 Jun 13;15(12):4191. doi: 10.3390/ma15124191.

Abstract

Replacing a specified quantity of cement with Class F fly ash contributes to sustainable development and reducing the greenhouse effect. In order to use Class F fly ash in self-compacting concrete (SCC), a prediction model that will give a satisfactory accuracy value for the compressive strength of such concrete is required. This paper considers a number of machine learning models created on a dataset of 327 experimentally tested samples in order to create an optimal predictive model. The set of input variables for all models consists of seven input variables, among which six are constituent components of SCC, and the seventh model variable represents the age of the sample. Models based on regression trees (RTs), Gaussian process regression (GPR), support vector regression (SVR) and artificial neural networks (ANNs) are considered. The accuracy of individual models and ensemble models are analyzed. The research shows that the model with the highest accuracy is an ensemble of ANNs. This accuracy expressed through the mean absolute error (MAE) and correlation coefficient (R) criteria is 4.37 MPa and 0.96, respectively. This paper also compares the accuracy of individual prediction models and determines their accuracy. Compared to theindividual ANN model, the more transparent multi-gene genetic programming (MGPP) model and the individual regression tree (RT) model have comparable or better prediction accuracy. The accuracy of the MGGP and RT models expressed through the MAE and R criteria is 5.70 MPa and 0.93, and 6.64 MPa and 0.89, respectively.

摘要

用F类粉煤灰替代特定数量的水泥有助于可持续发展并减少温室效应。为了在自密实混凝土(SCC)中使用F类粉煤灰,需要一个能为这种混凝土的抗压强度给出令人满意精度值的预测模型。本文考虑了在327个经过实验测试的样本数据集上创建的多个机器学习模型,以创建一个最优预测模型。所有模型的输入变量集由七个输入变量组成,其中六个是SCC的组成成分,第七个模型变量代表样本的龄期。考虑了基于回归树(RT)、高斯过程回归(GPR)、支持向量回归(SVR)和人工神经网络(ANN)的模型。分析了单个模型和集成模型的精度。研究表明,精度最高的模型是人工神经网络的集成。通过平均绝对误差(MAE)和相关系数(R)标准表示的该精度分别为4.37MPa和0.96。本文还比较了单个预测模型的精度并确定了它们的准确性。与单个人工神经网络模型相比,更具透明度的多基因遗传编程(MGPP)模型和单个回归树(RT)模型具有可比或更好的预测精度。通过MAE和R标准表示的MGGP和RT模型的精度分别为5.70MPa和0.93,以及6.64MPa和0.89。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/137f/9229836/b01ebe0c2c0c/materials-15-04191-g013.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验