Department of Electronic Engineering, Kwangwoon University, Seoul 01897, Korea.
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Jun 12;22(12):4447. doi: 10.3390/s22124447.
Indoor device-free localization (DFL) systems are used in various Internet-of-Things applications based on human behavior recognition. However, the usage of camera-based intuitive DFL approaches is limited in dark environments and disaster situations. Moreover, camera-based DFL schemes exhibit certain privacy issues. Therefore, DFL schemes with radars are increasingly being investigated owing to their efficient functioning in dark environments and their ability to prevent privacy issues. This study proposes a deep learning-based DFL scheme for simultaneous estimation of indoor location and posture using 24-GHz frequency-modulated continuous-wave (FMCW) radars. The proposed scheme uses a parallel 1D convolutional neural network structure with a regression and a classification model for localization and posture estimation, respectively. The two-dimensional location information of the target is estimated for localization, and four different postures, namely standing, sitting, lying, and absence, are estimated simultaneously. We experimentally evaluated the proposed scheme and compared its performance with that of conventional schemes under identical conditions. The results indicate that the average localization error of the proposed scheme is 0.23 m, whereas that of the conventional scheme is approximately 0.65 m. The average posture estimation error of the proposed scheme is approximately 1.7%, whereas that of the conventional correlation, CSP, and SVM schemes are 54.8%, 42%, and 10%, respectively.
基于人体行为识别的物联网应用中使用了室内无设备定位(DFL)系统。然而,基于摄像头的直观 DFL 方法在黑暗环境和灾难情况下的应用受到限制。此外,基于摄像头的 DFL 方案存在一定的隐私问题。因此,由于雷达的 DFL 方案在黑暗环境中的高效运行能力以及防止隐私问题的能力,它们越来越受到关注。本研究提出了一种基于深度学习的 DFL 方案,用于使用 24GHz 频移连续波(FMCW)雷达同时估计室内位置和姿势。所提出的方案使用具有回归和分类模型的并行 1D 卷积神经网络结构,分别用于位置和姿势估计。用于定位的目标的二维位置信息被估计,同时估计四个不同的姿势,即站立、坐下、躺下和不存在。我们对所提出的方案进行了实验评估,并在相同条件下将其性能与传统方案进行了比较。结果表明,所提出方案的平均定位误差为 0.23m,而传统方案的平均定位误差约为 0.65m。所提出方案的平均姿势估计误差约为 1.7%,而传统的相关、CSP 和 SVM 方案的平均姿势估计误差分别为 54.8%、42%和 10%。