• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全腹腔镜子宫切除术采用传统双极电外科手术与高压脉冲LigaSure的围手术期结果比较分析

Comparative Analysis of Peri-Operative Outcomes Following Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy with Conventional Bipolar-Electrosurgery versus High-Pressure Pulsed LigaSure Use.

作者信息

Batra Sanskriti, Bhardwaj Punita, Dagar Mamta

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, New Delhi, India.

出版信息

Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther. 2022 May 4;11(2):105-109. doi: 10.4103/GMIT.GMIT_69_20. eCollection 2022 Apr-Jun.

DOI:10.4103/GMIT.GMIT_69_20
PMID:35746909
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9212175/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Quick and effective hemostasis is essential for a successful laparoscopic surgery. Hence, it is of utmost importance for laparoscopic surgeons to understand the various available and emerging energy sources to tailor their use according to their properties and surgical requirement. The aim of this study was to compare LigaSure, an advanced bipolar versus conventional bipolar in total laparoscopic hysterectomy, with respect to operating time, mean blood loss, mean reduction in hemoglobin, intraoperative, and postoperative complications, and duration of prospective hospital stay.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

It was a randomized controlled study. One hundred and twenty patients scheduled for elective hysterectomy for any benign indication were randomly allocated to two groups namely, conventional bipolar group and LigaSure group. Patients with a history of ≥3 laparotomies, uterine size >20 weeks were excluded. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy with bilateral salpingectomy/salpingo oophorectomy was done in all the patients and endpoints were evaluated.

RESULTS

All the recruited participants ( = 120) achieved study endpoints. There was statistically significant difference in the meantime to dissect adnexal ligaments, primary and total operating time (for adnexal ligaments: Conventional bipolar-9.44 min vs. LigaSure-7.05 min; = 0.000) (Primary: Conventional bipolar-97.03 min vs. LigaSure 74.39 min; = 0.000) (Total: 142.5 min vs. 136.37 min = 0.002). Mean blood loss (145 ml vs. 141.67 ml; = 0.846), mean reduction in hemoglobin (0.802 versus 0.752; = 0.484) and duration of postoperative stay (2.54 days vs. 2.32 days; = 0.128) were comparable ( > 0.05). None of the participants suffered from any major complication during the surgery or in the postoperative recovery period.

CONCLUSION

With an ability to effectively reduce operating time, LigaSure is a safe and efficient instrument for laparoscopic hysterectomy.

摘要

目的

快速有效的止血对于成功的腹腔镜手术至关重要。因此,对于腹腔镜外科医生来说,了解各种现有的和新兴的能量源,根据其特性和手术需求进行合理使用至关重要。本研究的目的是比较在全腹腔镜子宫切除术中,先进的双极电凝设备LigaSure与传统双极电凝设备在手术时间、平均失血量、血红蛋白平均降低量、术中及术后并发症以及预期住院时间方面的差异。

材料与方法

这是一项随机对照研究。120例因任何良性指征计划行择期子宫切除术的患者被随机分为两组,即传统双极电凝组和LigaSure组。排除有≥3次剖腹手术史、子宫大小 >20周的患者。所有患者均行全腹腔镜子宫切除术及双侧输卵管切除术/输卵管卵巢切除术,并对研究终点进行评估。

结果

所有纳入的参与者(n = 120)均达到研究终点。在解剖附件韧带的时间、初次手术时间和总手术时间方面存在统计学显著差异(附件韧带:传统双极电凝组 - 9.44分钟 vs. LigaSure组 - 7.05分钟;P = 0.000)(初次手术:传统双极电凝组 - 97.03分钟 vs. LigaSure组74.39分钟;P = 0.000)(总手术时间:142.5分钟 vs. 136.37分钟,P = 0.002)。平均失血量(145毫升 vs. 141.67毫升;P = 0.846)、血红蛋白平均降低量(0.802对0.752;P = 0.484)和术后住院时间(2.54天 vs. 2.32天;P = 0.128)具有可比性(P > 0.05)。在手术期间或术后恢复期,没有参与者出现任何重大并发症。

结论

LigaSure能够有效缩短手术时间,是一种用于腹腔镜子宫切除术的安全、高效器械。

相似文献

1
Comparative Analysis of Peri-Operative Outcomes Following Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy with Conventional Bipolar-Electrosurgery versus High-Pressure Pulsed LigaSure Use.全腹腔镜子宫切除术采用传统双极电外科手术与高压脉冲LigaSure的围手术期结果比较分析
Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther. 2022 May 4;11(2):105-109. doi: 10.4103/GMIT.GMIT_69_20. eCollection 2022 Apr-Jun.
2
Perioperative outcomes using LigaSure compared with conventional bipolar instruments in laparoscopic hysterectomy: a randomised controlled trial.LigaSure 在腹腔镜子宫切除术中与传统双极器械相比的围手术期结局:一项随机对照试验。
BJOG. 2011 Dec;118(13):1568-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.03089.x. Epub 2011 Sep 6.
3
Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy using pulsed bipolar system: comparison with conventional bipolar electrosurgery.使用脉冲双极系统的腹腔镜根治性子宫切除术:与传统双极电外科手术的比较。
Gynecol Oncol. 2007 Jun;105(3):620-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2007.01.029. Epub 2007 Feb 15.
4
Perioperative outcomes using LigaSure™ compared to conventional bipolar instruments in laparoscopic salpingo-oophorectomy: a randomized controlled trial.LigaSure™ 在腹腔镜输卵管卵巢切除术与传统双极器械相比的围手术期结局:一项随机对照试验。
Surg Endosc. 2012 Oct;26(10):2884-91. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2274-8. Epub 2012 Apr 27.
5
Comparison of LigaSure™ tissue fusion system and a conventional bipolar device in hysterectomy via natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES): A randomized controlled trial.LigaSure™组织融合系统与传统双极设备在经自然腔道内镜手术(NOTES)子宫切除术中的比较:一项随机对照试验。
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Jan;58(1):128-132. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2018.11.024.
6
Perioperative outcomes of bipolar energy instruments in total laparoscopic hysterectomy.双极能量器械在全腹腔镜子宫切除术中的围手术期结果
Ginekol Pol. 2019;90(11):640-644. doi: 10.5603/GP.2019.0112.
7
Comparison of the use of LigaSure, HALO PKS cutting forceps, and ENSEAL tissue sealer in total laparoscopic hysterectomy: a randomized trial.LigaSure、HALO PKS切割钳和ENSEAL组织封闭器在全腹腔镜子宫切除术中的应用比较:一项随机试验。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014 Jul-Aug;21(4):650-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2014.01.010. Epub 2014 Jan 23.
8
Comparison of the efficacy and safety of two advanced vessel sealing technologies in total laparoscopic hysterectomy.两种先进血管闭合技术在全腹腔镜子宫切除术中的疗效与安全性比较。
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2019 Nov;45(11):2220-2227. doi: 10.1111/jog.14096. Epub 2019 Aug 19.
9
Comparison of Industry-Leading Energy Devices for Use in Gynecologic Laparoscopy: Articulating ENSEAL versus LigaSure Energy Devices.比较用于妇科腹腔镜手术的领先行业能源设备:铰接式 ENSEAL 与 LigaSure 能源设备。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2018 Mar-Apr;25(3):467-473.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2017.10.006. Epub 2017 Oct 12.
10
Advanced bipolar vessel sealing devices vs conventional bipolar energy in minimally invasive hysterectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.高级双极血管密封设备与传统双极能量在微创子宫切除术中的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024 Apr;309(4):1165-1174. doi: 10.1007/s00404-023-07270-8. Epub 2023 Nov 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Applications of different energy devices in laparoscopic and robotic gynecological surgery: a systematic review.不同能量设备在腹腔镜及机器人妇科手术中的应用:一项系统综述
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2025 May 27. doi: 10.1007/s00404-025-08055-x.
2
The New Concepts from New Evidences.新证据带来的新概念。
Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther. 2025 Feb 27;14(1):1-2. doi: 10.4103/gmit.GMIT-D-24-00064. eCollection 2025 Jan-Mar.
3
Electrosurgical Devices Used During Laparoscopic Hysterectomy.腹腔镜子宫切除术中使用的电外科设备。
JSLS. 2024 Jul-Sep;28(3). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2024.00022. Epub 2025 Jan 2.
4
Vaginal Vault Closure Following Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: Laparoscopic versus Conventional Technique - A Comparative Study.全腹腔镜子宫切除术后阴道穹窿封闭术:腹腔镜技术与传统技术的比较研究
Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther. 2023 Dec 7;13(2):90-94. doi: 10.4103/gmit.gmit_8_23. eCollection 2024 Apr-Jun.
5
Simple Enterolysis Techniques during Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery.微创妇科手术中的简单肠粘连松解技术
Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther. 2023 Dec 7;13(2):130-131. doi: 10.4103/gmit.gmit_44_23. eCollection 2024 Apr-Jun.
6
Optimizing Hysterectomy: A Prospective Comparative Analysis of Surgical Techniques and Their Impact on Women's Lives.优化子宫切除术:手术技术的前瞻性比较分析及其对女性生活的影响。
J Pers Med. 2024 Feb 29;14(3):265. doi: 10.3390/jpm14030265.
7
Hysterectomy through Minimally Invasive Surgery for Cervical High-grade Intraepithelial Neoplasia: Reassessment of the Specimens' Eligibility for Histological Examination.通过微创手术进行子宫切除术治疗宫颈高级别上皮内瘤变:重新评估标本进行组织学检查的合格性。
Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther. 2023 Aug 10;12(3):148-152. doi: 10.4103/gmit.gmit_68_22. eCollection 2023 Jul-Sep.

本文引用的文献

1
"Energy devices in gynecological laparoscopy - Archaic to modern era".妇科腹腔镜手术中的能量设备——从古老到现代
Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther. 2017 Oct-Dec;6(4):147-151. doi: 10.1016/j.gmit.2017.08.002. Epub 2017 Sep 1.
2
Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease.良性妇科疾病子宫切除术的手术入路
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Aug 12;2015(8):CD003677. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003677.pub5.
3
Global epidemiology of hysterectomy: possible impact on gynecological cancer rates.子宫切除术的全球流行病学:对妇科癌症发病率的可能影响。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Jul;213(1):23-29. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.02.019. Epub 2015 Feb 25.
4
Comparison of the use of LigaSure, HALO PKS cutting forceps, and ENSEAL tissue sealer in total laparoscopic hysterectomy: a randomized trial.LigaSure、HALO PKS切割钳和ENSEAL组织封闭器在全腹腔镜子宫切除术中的应用比较:一项随机试验。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014 Jul-Aug;21(4):650-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2014.01.010. Epub 2014 Jan 23.
5
Randomized study comparing use of THUNDERBEAT technology vs standard electrosurgery during laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for gynecologic cancer.一项随机研究,比较在妇科癌症的腹腔镜根治性子宫切除术和盆腔淋巴结清扫术中使用THUNDERBEAT技术与标准电外科手术的情况。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014 May-Jun;21(3):447-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2013.12.001. Epub 2013 Dec 8.
6
Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy using EnSeal vs standard bipolar coagulation technique: randomized controlled trial.腹腔镜下子宫颈上切除术采用 EnSeal 与标准双极电凝技术比较:随机对照试验。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2013 Sep-Oct;20(5):661-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2013.04.014. Epub 2013 Jun 20.
7
Economics and energy sources.经济学与能源。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2013 May-Jun;20(3):319-27. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2013.02.001.
8
Comparative studies of energy sources in gynecologic laparoscopy.妇科腹腔镜手术中能源的比较研究。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2013 May-Jun;20(3):308-18. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2013.01.014.
9
Laparoscopic vessel sealing technologies.腹腔镜血管密封技术。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2013 May-Jun;20(3):301-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2013.02.012.
10
Comparison of two bipolar systems in laparoscopic hysterectomy.两种双极系统在腹腔镜子宫切除术中的比较。
JSLS. 2012 Jul-Sep;16(3):456-60. doi: 10.4293/108680812X13462882736259.