Piacenza G, Cremonte L G, Salio M, Mantellini E
Minerva Med. 1987 Apr 30;78(8):515-6.
A study was conducted on 20 patients with isolated or multiple patches of doubtful significance in the framework of neoplastic or infectious pathologies or in the presence of probably infectious diffuse or localised pulmonary infiltrations in immunodepressed patients or those in whom broad spectrum antibiotic treatment had failed. Percutaneous needle aspiration and sterile brushing was performed for the purpose of bacteriological examination in all patients. The result showed the clear superiority of needle aspiration (75% positive) over sterile brushing (25%). The first method is therefore recommended for use in the diagnosis of so-called "difficult" lung pathologies.
对20例在肿瘤性或感染性病变范围内有孤立或多个意义可疑的斑片的患者进行了研究,这些患者包括免疫抑制患者或广谱抗生素治疗失败的患者,他们存在可能为感染性的弥漫性或局限性肺部浸润。为了进行细菌学检查,对所有患者均进行了经皮针吸和无菌刷检。结果显示针吸的阳性率(75%)明显高于无菌刷检(25%)。因此,推荐第一种方法用于诊断所谓的“疑难”肺部病变。