• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在真实环境中,哮喘药物类型对哮喘恶化的影响。

Effects of Asthma Medication Type on Asthma Exacerbation in a Real-World Setting.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Yonsei Med J. 2022 Jul;63(7):603-610. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2022.63.7.603.

DOI:10.3349/ymj.2022.63.7.603
PMID:35748071
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9226836/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Currently, there are multiple options for the pharmacological treatment of asthma. This study aimed to compare the effects of different asthma medications on exacerbation in a real-world setting.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed electronic medical records of asthma patients who visited the hospital from November 1, 2016 to October 31, 2019. The number of asthma exacerbations requiring administration of systemic steroids was the primary outcome. A time-varying Cox regression analysis was used to reflect the real-world setting: variable usage times, discontinuation, and switching of medication.

RESULTS

Among 937 patients with asthma, 228 (24.3%) experienced asthma exacerbation during the study period. Asthma exacerbation was observed in patients using short-acting β-agonists (SABA) alone (50.4% vs. 28.6%, <0.001) as well as in patients not using inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) (58.8% vs. 40.3%, <0.001), long-acting β-agonists (LABA) (54.8% vs. 36.1%, <0.001), and leukotriene receptor antagonists (71.5% vs. 50.8%, <0.001). A time-varying Cox regression analysis of asthma exacerbations according to the duration of asthma medication showed that SABA alone increased the risk of asthma exacerbation [hazard ratio (HR), 1.834; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.299-2.588; =0.001], whereas ICS-LABA decreased the risk (HR, 0.733; 95% CI, 0.538-0.997; =0.048). However, in the subgroup analysis according to medication type, specific ingredients showed no significant differences.

CONCLUSION

In the real world, asthma medications affect asthma exacerbation variably according to the medication type.

摘要

目的

目前,有多种药理学方法可用于治疗哮喘。本研究旨在比较不同哮喘药物在真实环境下对哮喘恶化的影响。

材料与方法

我们回顾性分析了 2016 年 11 月 1 日至 2019 年 10 月 31 日期间在我院就诊的哮喘患者的电子病历。主要结局为需要全身用皮质类固醇治疗的哮喘恶化次数。采用时变 Cox 回归分析来反映真实环境:药物的使用次数、停药和换药情况。

结果

在 937 例哮喘患者中,228 例(24.3%)在研究期间发生哮喘恶化。单独使用短效β激动剂(SABA)的患者(50.4%比 28.6%,<0.001)和未使用吸入皮质激素(ICS)的患者(58.8%比 40.3%,<0.001)、长效β激动剂(LABA)(54.8%比 36.1%,<0.001)和白三烯受体拮抗剂(LTRA)(71.5%比 50.8%,<0.001)哮喘恶化的发生率较高。根据哮喘药物使用时间的哮喘恶化时间变化 Cox 回归分析显示,单独使用 SABA 会增加哮喘恶化的风险[风险比(HR),1.834;95%置信区间(CI),1.299-2.588;=0.001],而 ICS-LABA 则降低了风险(HR,0.733;95%CI,0.538-0.997;=0.048)。然而,根据药物类型的亚组分析,特定成分没有显示出显著差异。

结论

在真实世界中,根据药物类型,哮喘药物对哮喘恶化的影响各不相同。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/183a/9226836/a6d098dd1bb5/ymj-63-603-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/183a/9226836/c3f990749617/ymj-63-603-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/183a/9226836/a6d098dd1bb5/ymj-63-603-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/183a/9226836/c3f990749617/ymj-63-603-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/183a/9226836/a6d098dd1bb5/ymj-63-603-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Effects of Asthma Medication Type on Asthma Exacerbation in a Real-World Setting.在真实环境中,哮喘药物类型对哮喘恶化的影响。
Yonsei Med J. 2022 Jul;63(7):603-610. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2022.63.7.603.
2
Addition of inhaled long-acting beta2-agonists to inhaled steroids as first line therapy for persistent asthma in steroid-naive adults.在未使用过类固醇的成年持续性哮喘患者中,吸入长效β2受体激动剂联合吸入性类固醇作为一线治疗方案。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Apr 18(2):CD005307. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005307.
3
Long-acting beta2-agonists versus anti-leukotrienes as add-on therapy to inhaled corticosteroids for chronic asthma.长效β2受体激动剂与抗白三烯药物作为吸入性糖皮质激素治疗慢性哮喘的附加疗法比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jan 25(1):CD003137. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003137.pub2.
4
Combination of inhaled long-acting beta2-agonists and inhaled steroids versus higher dose of inhaled steroids in children and adults with persistent asthma.吸入长效β2受体激动剂与吸入性糖皮质激素联合使用与高剂量吸入性糖皮质激素治疗儿童和成人持续性哮喘的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Oct 19(4):CD005533. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005533.
5
Long-acting beta2-agonists versus anti-leukotrienes as add-on therapy to inhaled corticosteroids for chronic asthma.长效β2受体激动剂与抗白三烯药物作为吸入性糖皮质激素治疗慢性哮喘的附加疗法比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Oct 18(4):CD003137. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003137.pub3.
6
Long-acting beta2-agonists versus placebo in addition to inhaled corticosteroids in children and adults with chronic asthma.长效β2受体激动剂与安慰剂用于慢性哮喘儿童和成人并联合吸入性糖皮质激素的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Oct 19(4):CD005535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005535.
7
Addition to inhaled corticosteroids of long-acting beta2-agonists versus anti-leukotrienes for chronic asthma.长效β2受体激动剂与抗白三烯药物联合吸入糖皮质激素治疗慢性哮喘的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 May 11(5):CD003137. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003137.pub4.
8
Long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMA) added to inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) versus the same dose of ICS alone for adults with asthma.长效毒蕈碱拮抗剂(LAMA)与吸入性糖皮质激素(ICS)联合使用,对比单独使用相同剂量ICS用于成人哮喘患者的疗效。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Aug 24;2015(8):CD011397. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011397.pub2.
9
SMART for the treatment of asthma: A network meta-analysis of real-world evidence.SMART用于哮喘治疗:真实世界证据的网状Meta分析
Respir Med. 2021 Nov;188:106611. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2021.106611. Epub 2021 Sep 7.
10
A Comparison of the Effectiveness of Asthma Medications on Asthma Exacerbations in Real World National Cohort.真实世界全国队列中哮喘药物对哮喘急性加重疗效的比较
J Asthma Allergy. 2022 Aug 24;15:1155-1165. doi: 10.2147/JAA.S379394. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of chitinase-1 inhibitor in obesity-induced and -aggravated asthma in a murine model.壳聚糖酶-1 抑制剂在肥胖诱导和加重的哮喘小鼠模型中的作用。
Life Sci. 2023 Dec 1;334:122163. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2023.122163. Epub 2023 Oct 25.

本文引用的文献

1
Global Initiative for Asthma Strategy 2021: Executive Summary and Rationale for Key Changes.全球哮喘倡议 2021 策略:执行摘要和关键变更的理由。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2022 Jan 1;205(1):17-35. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202109-2205PP.
2
Risk Factors Predicting Severe Asthma Exacerbations in Adult Asthmatics: A Real-World Clinical Evidence.预测成年哮喘患者严重哮喘发作的危险因素:真实世界临床证据
Allergy Asthma Immunol Res. 2021 May;13(3):420-434. doi: 10.4168/aair.2021.13.3.420.
3
Biomarkers for Severe Asthma: Lessons From Longitudinal Cohort Studies.
重症哮喘的生物标志物:纵向队列研究的经验教训
Allergy Asthma Immunol Res. 2021 May;13(3):375-389. doi: 10.4168/aair.2021.13.3.375.
4
Evaluation and Management of Difficult-to-Treat and Severe Asthma: An Expert Opinion From the Korean Academy of Asthma, Allergy and Clinical Immunology, the Working Group on Severe Asthma.难治性和重度哮喘的评估与管理:韩国哮喘、过敏与临床免疫学会重度哮喘工作组的专家意见
Allergy Asthma Immunol Res. 2020 Nov;12(6):910-933. doi: 10.4168/aair.2020.12.6.910.
5
Impact of the Asthma Quality Assessment Program on Burden of Asthma.哮喘质量评估计划对哮喘负担的影响。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2021 Jan;9(1):419-425.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2020.08.038. Epub 2020 Sep 2.
6
Asthma-Related Health Outcomes Associated with Short-Acting β-Agonist Inhaler Use: An Observational UK Study as Part of the SABINA Global Program.与短效 β 激动剂吸入器使用相关的哮喘相关健康结局:作为 SABINA 全球计划的一部分的英国观察性研究。
Adv Ther. 2020 Oct;37(10):4190-4208. doi: 10.1007/s12325-020-01444-5. Epub 2020 Jul 27.
7
SMART and as-needed therapies in mild-to-severe asthma: a network meta-analysis.轻至重度哮喘的SMART和按需治疗:一项网状Meta分析。
Eur Respir J. 2020 Sep 10;56(3). doi: 10.1183/13993003.00625-2020. Print 2020 Sep.
8
SABINA: An Overview of Short-Acting β-Agonist Use in Asthma in European Countries.SABINA:欧洲国家中短效 β 激动剂在哮喘中的应用概述。
Adv Ther. 2020 Mar;37(3):1124-1135. doi: 10.1007/s12325-020-01233-0. Epub 2020 Jan 24.
9
Overuse of short-acting β-agonists in asthma is associated with increased risk of exacerbation and mortality: a nationwide cohort study of the global SABINA programme.哮喘患者过度使用短效β受体激动剂与急性加重风险及死亡率增加相关:全球SABINA项目的一项全国性队列研究
Eur Respir J. 2020 Apr 16;55(4). doi: 10.1183/13993003.01872-2019. Print 2020 Apr.
10
Montelukast Improves Symptoms and Lung Function in Asthmatic Women Compared With Men.与男性相比,孟鲁司特可改善哮喘女性的症状和肺功能。
Front Pharmacol. 2019 Sep 24;10:1094. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2019.01094. eCollection 2019.