Suppr超能文献

病原体减少和常规血小板成分输血的肺部不良事件比较风险。

Comparative risk of pulmonary adverse events with transfusion of pathogen reduced and conventional platelet components.

机构信息

Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.

Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.

出版信息

Transfusion. 2022 Jul;62(7):1365-1376. doi: 10.1111/trf.16987. Epub 2022 Jun 24.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Platelet transfusion carries risk of transfusion-transmitted infection (TTI). Pathogen reduction of platelet components (PRPC) is designed to reduce TTI. Pulmonary adverse events (AEs), including transfusion-related acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) occur with platelet transfusion.

STUDY DESIGN

An open label, sequential cohort study of transfusion-dependent hematology-oncology patients was conducted to compare pulmonary safety of PRPC with conventional PC (CPC). The primary outcome was the incidence of treatment-emergent assisted mechanical ventilation (TEAMV) by non-inferiority. Secondary outcomes included: time to TEAMV, ARDS, pulmonary AEs, peri-transfusion AE, hemorrhagic AE, transfusion reactions (TRs), PC and red blood cell (RBC) use, and mortality.

RESULTS

By modified intent-to-treat (mITT), 1068 patients received 5277 PRPC and 1223 patients received 5487 CPC. The cohorts had similar demographics, primary disease, and primary therapy. PRPC were non-inferior to CPC for TEAMV (treatment difference -1.7%, 95% CI: (-3.3% to -0.1%); odds ratio = 0.53, 95% CI: (0.30, 0.94). The cumulative incidence of TEAMV for PRPC (2.9%) was significantly less than CPC (4.6%, p = .039). The incidence of ARDS was less, but not significantly different, for PRPC (1.0% vs. 1.8%, p = .151; odds ratio = 0.57, 95% CI: (0.27, 1.18). AE, pulmonary AE, and mortality were not different between cohorts. TRs were similar for PRPC and CPC (8.3% vs. 9.7%, p = .256); and allergic TR were significantly less with PRPC (p = .006). PC and RBC use were not increased with PRPC.

DISCUSSION

PRPC demonstrated reduced TEAMV with no excess treatment-related pulmonary morbidity.

摘要

背景

血小板输注存在输血传播感染(TTI)的风险。血小板成分病原体减少(PRPC)旨在降低 TTI。血小板输注会引起肺部不良事件(AE),包括输血相关急性肺损伤和急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)。

研究设计

对依赖输血的血液肿瘤患者进行了一项开放标签、连续队列研究,以比较 PRPC 与常规血小板(CPC)的肺部安全性。主要结局为非劣效性治疗后出现的有创机械通气(TEAMV)发生率。次要结局包括:TEAMV 时间、ARDS、肺部 AE、输血前 AE、出血性 AE、输血反应(TR)、血小板和红细胞(RBC)使用以及死亡率。

结果

根据改良意向治疗(mITT),1068 例患者接受了 5277 次 PRPC 输注,1223 例患者接受了 5487 次 CPC 输注。两组患者的人口统计学特征、主要疾病和主要治疗方法相似。PRPC 与 CPC 相比,TEAMV 无差异(治疗差异-1.7%,95%CI:(-3.3%至-0.1%);优势比=0.53,95%CI:(0.30,0.94)。PRPC 的 TEAMV 累积发生率(2.9%)明显低于 CPC(4.6%,p=0.039)。PRPC 的 ARDS 发生率虽较低,但无统计学差异(1.0% vs. 1.8%,p=0.151;优势比=0.57,95%CI:(0.27,1.18)。两组患者的 AE、肺部 AE 和死亡率无差异。PRPC 和 CPC 的 TR 相似(8.3% vs. 9.7%,p=0.256);且 PRPC 的过敏 TR 明显减少(p=0.006)。PRPC 并未增加血小板和 RBC 的使用。

讨论

PRPC 降低了 TEAMV,且未增加与治疗相关的肺部发病率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a27/9544211/6c8b3092bd5f/TRF-62-1365-g003.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验