MIT Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Cambridge, MA, USA; Sagol School of Neuroscience, School of Psychological Sciences, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel; Minducate Science of Learning Research and Innovation Center, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
The Project Prakash Center, Delhi, India; Amarnath and Shashi Khosla School of Information Technology, Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi, India.
Neuropsychologia. 2022 Sep 9;174:108307. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2022.108307. Epub 2022 Jun 22.
The long-standing nativist vs. empiricist debate asks a foundational question in epistemology - does our knowledge arise through experience or is it available innately? Studies that probe the sensitivity of newborns and patients recovering from congenital blindness are central in informing this dialogue. One of the most robust sensitivities our visual system possesses is to 'biological motion' - the movement patterns of humans and other vertebrates. Various biological motion perception skills (such as distinguishing between movement of human and non-human animals, or between upright and inverted human movement) become evident within the first months of life. The mechanisms of acquiring these capabilities, and specifically the contribution of visual experience to their development, are still under debate. We had the opportunity to directly examine the role of visual experience in biological motion perception, by testing what level of sensitivity is present immediately upon onset of sight following years of congenital visual deprivation. Two congenitally blind patients who underwent sight-restorative cataract-removal surgery late in life (at the ages of 7 and 20 years) were tested before and after sight restoration. The patients were shown displays of walking humans, pigeons, and cats, and asked to describe what they saw. Visual recognition of movement patterns emerged immediately upon eye-opening following surgery, when the patients spontaneously began to identify human, but not animal, biological motion. This recognition ability was evident contemporaneously for upright and inverted human displays. These findings suggest that visual recognition of human motion patterns may not critically depend on visual experience, as it was evident upon first exposure to un-obstructed sight in patients with very limited prior visual exposure, and furthermore, was not limited to the typical (upright) orientation of humans in real-life settings.
长期以来的先天论与经验论之争在认识论中提出了一个基本问题——我们的知识是通过经验产生的,还是先天存在的?探究新生儿和先天性失明患者恢复情况的研究在为这一对话提供信息方面起着核心作用。我们的视觉系统具有的最强大的敏感性之一是对“生物运动”——人类和其他脊椎动物的运动模式的敏感性。各种生物运动知觉技能(例如区分人类和非人类动物的运动,或区分直立和倒置的人类运动)在生命的头几个月就变得明显。获得这些能力的机制,特别是视觉经验对其发展的贡献,仍在争论之中。我们有机会通过测试在多年先天性视觉剥夺后视力恢复后立即存在的敏感性水平,直接研究视觉经验在生物运动知觉中的作用。两名在晚年(7 岁和 20 岁)接受视力恢复性白内障摘除手术的先天性盲人患者在视力恢复前后接受了测试。向患者展示了行走的人类、鸽子和猫的显示,并要求他们描述他们看到的内容。手术后,当患者立即开始识别人类但不是动物的生物运动时,视觉对运动模式的识别就立即出现了。这种识别能力同时适用于直立和倒置的人类显示。这些发现表明,对人类运动模式的视觉识别可能不严重依赖于视觉经验,因为它在患者接受非常有限的先前视觉暴露的情况下,在首次接触无障碍视力时就很明显,而且不限于现实生活中人类的典型(直立)方向。