University of North Carolina Kidney Center, Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA; Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Kidney Int. 2022 Oct;102(4):894-903. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2022.05.024. Epub 2022 Jun 23.
Azithromycin is an antibiotic with QT-prolonging potential commonly prescribed to individuals receiving hemodialysis. Hemodialysis patients have a high prevalence of clinical conditions, such as structural heart disease, that can enhance the pro-arrhythmic effects azithromycin, but were excluded from prior investigations evaluating the cardiac safety of azithromycin. Using data from the United States Renal Data System (2007-2017), we conducted two cohort studies to examine the cardiac safety of azithromycin relative to amoxicillin-based antibiotics (amoxicillin, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid) and levofloxacin (a fluoroquinolone antibiotic known to prolong the QT-interval) in the hemodialysis population. The primary outcome was five-day sudden cardiac death. Using inverse probability of treatment weighted survival models, we estimated hazard ratios, risk differences, and 95% confidence intervals. The azithromycin vs. amoxicillin-based antibiotic cohort included 282,899 patients and 725,431 treatment episodes (381,306 azithromycin and 344,125 amoxicillin-based episodes). Azithromycin vs. amoxicillin-based antibiotic treatment was associated with higher relative and absolute risks of sudden cardiac death, weighted hazard ratio of 1.70 (95% Confidence Interval, 1.36 to 2.11) and weighted risk difference per 100,000 treatment episodes of 25.0 (15.5 to 36.5). The azithromycin vs. levofloxacin cohort included 245,143 patients and 554,557 treatment episodes (387,382 azithromycin and 167,175 levofloxacin episodes). Azithromycin vs. levofloxacin treatment was associated with lower relative and absolute risks of sudden cardiac death, weighted hazard ratio of 0.79 (0.64 to 0.96) and weighted risk difference per 100,000 treatment episodes of -18.9 (-35.5 to -3.8). Thus, when selecting among azithromycin, levofloxacin, and amoxicillin-based antibiotics, clinicians should weigh the relative antimicrobial benefits of these drugs against their potential cardiac risks.
阿奇霉素是一种具有潜在 QT 延长作用的抗生素,常被开给接受血液透析的患者。血液透析患者有很高的临床疾病患病率,例如结构性心脏病,这些疾病可以增强阿奇霉素的致心律失常作用,但在评估阿奇霉素心脏安全性的先前研究中被排除在外。利用美国肾脏数据系统(2007-2017 年)的数据,我们进行了两项队列研究,以检查阿奇霉素相对于阿莫西林为基础的抗生素(阿莫西林、阿莫西林/克拉维酸)和左氧氟沙星(一种已知延长 QT 间期的氟喹诺酮类抗生素)在血液透析人群中的心脏安全性。主要结局为五天内突然心脏死亡。使用逆概率治疗加权生存模型,我们估计了危险比、风险差异和 95%置信区间。阿奇霉素与阿莫西林为基础的抗生素队列包括 282899 名患者和 725431 个治疗周期(381306 个阿奇霉素周期和 344125 个阿莫西林为基础的周期)。与阿莫西林为基础的抗生素治疗相比,阿奇霉素治疗与突然心脏死亡的相对和绝对风险增加有关,加权危险比为 1.70(95%置信区间,1.36 至 2.11),每 100000 个治疗周期的加权风险差异为 25.0(15.5 至 36.5)。阿奇霉素与左氧氟沙星队列包括 245143 名患者和 554557 个治疗周期(387382 个阿奇霉素周期和 167175 个左氧氟沙星周期)。与左氧氟沙星治疗相比,阿奇霉素治疗与突然心脏死亡的相对和绝对风险降低有关,加权危险比为 0.79(0.64 至 0.96),每 100000 个治疗周期的加权风险差异为-18.9(-35.5 至-3.8)。因此,在选择阿奇霉素、左氧氟沙星和阿莫西林为基础的抗生素时,临床医生应权衡这些药物的相对抗菌益处与其潜在的心脏风险。