Palmer Center for Chiropractic Research, Palmer College of Chiropractic, Davenport, Iowa.
Department of Epidemiology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa.
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2021 Nov-Dec;44(9):690-698. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2022.03.009. Epub 2022 Jun 23.
The purpose of this study was to describe the diagnoses and chiropractic services performed by doctors of chiropractic operating within 3 military treatment facilities for patients with low back pain (LBP).
This was a descriptive secondary analysis of a pragmatic clinical trial comparing usual medical care (UMC) plus chiropractic care to UMC alone for U.S. active-duty military personnel with LBP. Participants who were allocated to receive UMC plus 6 weeks of chiropractic care and who attended at least 1 chiropractic visit (n = 350; 1547 unique visits) were included in this analysis. International Classification of Diseases and Current Procedural Terminology codes were transcribed from chiropractic treatment paper forms. The number of participants receiving each diagnosis and service and the number of each service on unique visits was tabulated. Low back pain and co-occurring diagnoses were grouped into neuropathic, nociceptive, bone and/or joint, general pain, and nonallopathic lesions categories. Services were categorized as evaluation, active interventions, and passive interventions.
The most reported pain diagnoses were lumbalgia (66.1%) and thoracic pain (6.6%). Most reported neuropathic pain diagnoses were sciatica (4.9%) and lumbosacral neuritis or radiculitis (2.9%). For the nociceptive pain, low back sprain and/or strain (15.8%) and lumbar facet syndrome (9.2%) were most common. Most reported diagnoses in the bone and/or joint category were intervertebral disc degeneration (8.6%) and spondylosis (6.0%). Tobacco use disorder (5.7%) was the most common in the other category. Chiropractic care was compromised of passive interventions (94%), with spinal manipulative therapy being the most common, active interventions (77%), with therapeutic exercise being most common, and a combination of passive and active interventions (72%).
For the sample in this study, doctors of chiropractic within 3 military treatment facilities diagnosed, managed, and provided clinical evaluations for a range of LBP conditions. Although spinal manipulation was the most commonly used modality, chiropractic care included a multimodal approach, comprising of both active and passive interventions a majority of the time.
本研究旨在描述在 3 家军事治疗机构中,从事脊椎治疗的医生为腰痛患者(LBP)进行的诊断和脊椎治疗服务。
这是一项对实用临床试验的描述性二次分析,该试验比较了常规医疗(UMC)加脊椎治疗与 UMC 单独治疗美国现役军人腰痛的效果。参与者被分配接受 UMC 加 6 周的脊椎治疗,并至少接受 1 次脊椎治疗(n=350;1547 次独特就诊),这项分析包括了这些参与者。国际疾病分类和当前程序术语代码是从脊椎治疗记录表格转录而来的。列出了每位参与者接受的诊断和服务的数量,以及每次就诊的服务数量。腰痛和并存的诊断被分为神经病理性、伤害感受性、骨和/或关节、一般性疼痛和非顺势疗法病变类别。服务分为评估、主动干预和被动干预。
报告的最常见疼痛诊断是腰痛(66.1%)和胸背痛(6.6%)。报告的最常见神经病理性疼痛诊断是坐骨神经痛(4.9%)和腰骶神经根炎或神经根炎(2.9%)。对于伤害感受性疼痛,最常见的是腰痛扭伤和/或劳损(15.8%)和腰椎小关节综合征(9.2%)。报告的最常见骨和/或关节类别的诊断是椎间盘退行性变(8.6%)和颈椎病(6.0%)。其他类别中最常见的诊断是烟草使用障碍(5.7%)。脊椎治疗主要由被动干预(94%)组成,其中脊椎手法治疗最为常见,主动干预(77%),其中以运动疗法最为常见,以及被动和主动干预的结合(72%)。
对于本研究中的样本,3 家军事治疗机构的脊椎治疗医生对一系列腰痛状况进行了诊断、管理和提供临床评估。虽然脊椎手法治疗是最常用的治疗方法,但脊椎治疗包括一种多模式的方法,大部分时间都包括主动和被动干预。