Curso de Pós-Graduação em Produção e Sanidade Animal (PPGPSA), Instituto Federal Catarinense, 89245-000 Araquari, Santa Catarina, Brazil.
Instituto Federal Catarinense, Campus Araquari, 89245-000 Araquari, Santa Catarina, Brazil.
Prev Vet Med. 2022 Aug;205:105696. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2022.105696. Epub 2022 Jun 17.
Antimicrobial substitutes are being used in pig production systems, to maintain the health of the animals without compromising their performance. The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of either the removal of in feed antimicrobials or their substitution for feed additives, at the nursery and growing/finishing stages. At weaning, 1091 piglets were sexed, vaccinated, homogenized by weight and allocated to six treatments during the nursery stage (26-63 d): T1- feed with no antimicrobials nor additives; T2 - feed with antimicrobials; T3 - feed with prebiotic; T4 - feed with probiotic; T5 - feed with essential oils; T6 - feed with organic acids. The same treatments were applied to 840 pigs during the growing/finishing stages (64-167 d). There was no effect of the treatments on feed conversion at the nursery (P = 0.222) and the growing/finishing (P = 0.809) stages. The average daily gain did not differ across treatments in the nursery (P = 0.342) and in growing/finishing (P = 0.050). The cost of the interventions with injectable drugs was not different between the treatments neither at the nursery (P = 0.990) nor at the growing/finishing (P = 0.310). However, the pneumonia and pleurisy index for all treatments was equal or above 1.0, which indicates a respiratory challenge. There was an increase in the cost with antimicrobials or additives per kg of feed produced, which impacts the cost per kg of pig produced. In conclusion, the removal of antimicrobials in pig diets is financially feasible and their substitution by additives did not impact growing performance.
抗菌替代品正在被应用于猪生产系统中,以在不影响动物生产性能的情况下维持其健康。本研究的目的是评估在仔猪和生长/育肥阶段去除饲料中的抗生素或用饲料添加剂替代抗生素对动物的影响。在断奶时,将 1091 头仔猪进行性别鉴定、接种疫苗、按体重混合,并在保育阶段(26-63 天)分配到六个处理组中:T1-不含抗生素和添加剂的饲料;T2-含抗生素的饲料;T3-含益生元的饲料;T4-含益生菌的饲料;T5-含精油的饲料;T6-含有机酸的饲料。在生长/育肥阶段(64-167 天),同样的处理应用于 840 头猪。处理组对保育阶段(P=0.222)和生长/育肥阶段(P=0.809)的饲料转化率均无影响。保育阶段(P=0.342)和生长/育肥阶段(P=0.050)的日增重也不受处理组的影响。在保育阶段(P=0.990)和生长/育肥阶段(P=0.310),各处理组的注射药物干预成本也没有差异。然而,所有处理组的肺炎和胸膜炎指数均等于或高于 1.0,这表明存在呼吸道挑战。每公斤饲料添加抗生素或添加剂的成本增加,这会影响每公斤猪的生产成本。总之,从经济角度来看,在猪饲料中去除抗生素是可行的,用添加剂替代抗生素不会影响生长性能。