Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia.
Instituto de Investigaciones Médicas, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia.
Rev Colomb Psiquiatr (Engl Ed). 2022 Apr-Jun;51(2):123-132. doi: 10.1016/j.rcpeng.2020.10.007. Epub 2022 Jun 23.
Predominant polarity (PP) has been proposed as a specifier of bipolar disorder (BD) due to its relationship with clinical and prognostic variables. It is possible that this is due to a different underlying neurobiology, in such a way that the changes found by structural nuclear magnetic resonance imaging (sMRI) in BD are different and specific.
To explore findings of structural neuroimaging in patients with BD type I (BD-I) according to PP.
Cross-sectional study that evaluated 77 patients with BD-I using the DIGS interview. PP was established using the operative definition of two-thirds of all affective episodes throughout life to classify PP as manic (MPP), depressive (DPP) or indeterminate (IPP). MRI was performed during the euthymia phase to measure intracranial structures. The data obtained was analysed using a linear regression model adjusted for confounding variables (drug use, alcohol use, psychoactive substance use) and were compared between the three groups finding the standardised mean difference (SMD).
Differences with adequate effect size were found in three brain structures after adjusting for confounding variables, specifically in the right fusiform gyrus and the left lingual gyrus, which were greater in the DPP group than in the MPP group (SMD = 0.92; 95% CI = 0.34-1.49 and SMD = 0.78; 95% CI = 0.21-1.35). Likewise, in the right thalamus, it was shown to be greater in the IPP group compared to MPP group (SMD 0.89, 95% CI = 0.31-1.46).
A reduction in the thickness of the right fusiform gyrus and the left lingual gyrus, as well as the right thalamic volume was observed in patients with BD-I with PPM, which supports the hypothesis that PP has a plausible neurobiological correlate and could have potential utility as a BD specifier.
由于主要极性 (PP) 与临床和预后变量有关,因此被认为是双相障碍 (BD) 的一个特征。这可能是由于不同的潜在神经生物学所致,即 BD 患者的结构磁共振成像 (sMRI) 发现的变化是不同且特定的。
根据 PP 探讨 I 型双相障碍 (BD-I) 患者的结构神经影像学发现。
采用 DIGS 访谈对 77 例 BD-I 患者进行横断面研究。使用终生所有情感发作中三分之二的手术定义来确定 PP 为躁狂 (MPP)、抑郁 (DPP) 或不确定 (IPP)。在病情稳定期进行 MRI 以测量颅内结构。使用线性回归模型分析数据,调整混杂变量(药物使用、酒精使用、精神活性物质使用),并在三组之间比较发现标准化均数差 (SMD)。
调整混杂变量后,在三个脑结构中发现差异具有足够的效应量,特别是在右侧梭状回和左侧舌回,DPP 组比 MPP 组更大(SMD=0.92;95%CI=0.34-1.49 和 SMD=0.78;95%CI=0.21-1.35)。同样,右侧丘脑在 IPP 组中比 MPP 组更大(SMD 0.89,95%CI=0.31-1.46)。
BD-I 患者的右梭状回和左舌回变薄以及右侧丘脑体积减小,这支持了 PP 具有合理的神经生物学相关性的假设,并且可能作为 BD 的特征具有潜在的实用性。