Department of Human Resources Management, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Trois-Rivières, Quebec, Canada.
School of Industrial Relations, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Work. 2022;72(4):1469-1480. doi: 10.3233/WOR-210843.
Psychological distress affects between 5 and 27% of the general population [1]. Workers facing stressful work conditions are especially at high risk for experiencing psychological distress [1].
To evaluate the association between work organization conditions and work performance via psychological distress. While the individual contribution of work organization conditions to psychological distress and work performance has been examined in the scientific literature, their combined influence on work performance remains relatively unknown.
To adjust for design effects, we relied on cluster sampling (employees working in organizations). MPlus was used to conduct path analyses [2].
While psychological demands, number of hours worked, and job insecurity were positively associated with psychological distress, job recognition was negatively associated with it. In the same vein, irregular work schedules and job insecurity seem to be negatively associated with work performance. On the one hand, skill utilization, decision latitude, recognition, and job promotion, all seemed to be positively associated with employee's work performance. On the other hand, psychological demands, number of hours worked, and job insecurity were negatively and indirectly associated with work performance.
Understanding the indirect association between work variables and workers' psychological distress could promote their work performance. Understanding this association could help shed light on the difficulties employees with psychological distress face while meeting their job requirements. The results of this study should serve as a reminder to intervene on work organization conditions.
心理困扰影响着 5%至 27%的普通人群[1]。面临压力工作环境的劳动者尤其容易经历心理困扰[1]。
通过心理困扰评估工作组织条件与工作绩效之间的关系。虽然工作组织条件对心理困扰和工作绩效的个体贡献已在科学文献中进行了检验,但它们对工作绩效的综合影响仍知之甚少。
为了调整设计效应,我们依赖于聚类抽样(在组织中工作的员工)。使用 MPlus 进行路径分析[2]。
心理需求、工作时间和工作不安全感与心理困扰呈正相关,而工作认可与心理困扰呈负相关。同样,不规则的工作时间表和工作不安全感似乎与工作绩效呈负相关。一方面,技能利用、决策自由度、认可和工作晋升似乎与员工的工作绩效呈正相关。另一方面,心理需求、工作时间和工作不安全感与工作绩效呈负向和间接相关。
理解工作变量与工人心理困扰之间的间接关联可以促进他们的工作绩效。理解这种关联可以帮助揭示心理困扰员工在满足工作要求时所面临的困难。本研究的结果应提醒人们干预工作组织条件。