Polidoro Dakir, Temmerman Robin, Devreese Mathias, Charalambous Marios, Ham Luc Van, Cornelis Ine, Broeckx Bart J G, Mandigers Paul J J, Fischer Andrea, Storch Jan, Bhatti Sofie F M
Small Animal Department, Small Animal Teaching Hospital, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Department of Pathobiology, Pharmacology and Zoological Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Front Vet Sci. 2022 Jun 7;9:899940. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.899940. eCollection 2022.
The therapeutic potential of cannabidiol (CBD), a non-psychtropic component of the plant, is substantiated more and more. We aimed to determine the pharmacokinetic behavior of CBD after a single dose intranasal (IN) and intrarectal (IR) administration in six healthy Beagle dogs age 3-8 years old, and compare to the oral administration route (PO). Standardized dosages applied for IN, IR and PO were 20, 100, and 100 mg, respectively. Each dog underwent the same protocol but received CBD through a different administration route. CBD plasma concentrations were determined by ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry before and at fixed time points after administration. Non-compartmental analysis was performed on the plasma concentration-time profiles. Plasma CBD concentrations after IR administration were below the limit of quantification. The mean area under the curve (AUC) after IN and PO CBD administration was 61 and 1,376 ng/mL*h, respectively. The maximal plasma CBD concentration (C) after IN and PO CBD administration was 28 and 217 ng/mL reached after 0.5 and 3.5 h (T), respectively. Significant differences between IN and PO administration were found in the T ( = 0.04). Higher AUC and C were achieved with 100 mg PO compared to 20 mg IN, but no significant differences were found when AUC ( = 0.09) and C ( = 0.44) were normalized to 1 mg dosages. IN administration of CBD resulted in faster absorption when compared to PO administration. However, PO remains the most favorable route for CBD delivery due to its more feasible administration. The IR administration route is not advised for clinical application.
大麻二酚(CBD)是该植物的一种非精神活性成分,其治疗潜力得到越来越多的证实。我们旨在确定3至8岁的6只健康比格犬单次鼻内(IN)和直肠内(IR)给药后CBD的药代动力学行为,并与口服给药途径(PO)进行比较。IN、IR和PO的标准化剂量分别为20、100和100毫克。每只狗都接受相同的方案,但通过不同的给药途径接受CBD。给药前和给药后固定时间点通过超高效液相色谱-串联质谱法测定CBD血浆浓度。对血浆浓度-时间曲线进行非房室分析。IR给药后的血浆CBD浓度低于定量限。IN和PO给药后CBD的平均曲线下面积(AUC)分别为61和1376 ng/mL*h。IN和PO给药后血浆CBD的最大浓度(C)分别在0.5小时和3.5小时(T)达到28和217 ng/mL。IN和PO给药之间在T方面存在显著差异(P = 0.04)。与20毫克IN相比,100毫克PO的AUC和C更高,但当AUC(P = 0.09)和C(P = 0.44)归一化为1毫克剂量时未发现显著差异。与PO给药相比,IN给药的CBD吸收更快。然而,由于PO给药更可行,它仍然是CBD给药最有利的途径。不建议将IR给药途径用于临床应用。