Behavioral Pharmacology Research Unit, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 5510 Nathan Shock Dr., Baltimore, MD 21224, USA.
Clinical Reference Laboratory, 8433 Quivira Rd, Lenexa, KS 66214, USA.
J Anal Toxicol. 2022 May 20;46(5):494-503. doi: 10.1093/jat/bkab059.
The market for products containing cannabidiol (CBD) is booming globally. However, the pharmacokinetics of CBD in different oral formulations and the impact of CBD use on urine drug testing outcomes for cannabis (e.g., 11-nor-9-carboxy-Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ9-THCCOOH)) are understudied. This study characterized the urinary pharmacokinetics of CBD (100 mg) following vaporization or oral administration (including three formulations: gelcap, pharmacy-grade syrup and or Epidiolex) as well as vaporized CBD-dominant cannabis (containing 100 mg CBD and 3.7 mg Δ9-THC) in healthy adults (n = 18). A subset of participants (n = 6) orally administered CBD syrup following overnight fasting (versus low-fat breakfast). Urine specimens were collected before and for 58 h after dosing on a residential research unit. Immunoassay (IA) screening (cutoffs: 20, 50 and 100 ng/mL) for Δ9-THCCOOH was performed, and quantitation of cannabinoids was completed via LC-MS-MS. Urinary CBD concentrations (ng/mL) were higher after oral (mean Cmax: 734; mean Tmax: 4.7 h, n = 18) versus vaporized CBD (mean Cmax: 240; mean Tmax: 1.3 h, n = 18), and oral dose formulation significantly impacted mean Cmax (Epidiolex = 1,274 ng/mL, capsule = 776 ng/mL, syrup = 151 ng/mL, n = 6/group) with little difference in Tmax. Overnight fasting had limited impact on CBD excretion in urine, and there was no evidence of CBD conversion to Δ8- or Δ9-THC in any route or formulation in which pure CBD was administered. Following acute administration of vaporized CBD-dominant cannabis, 3 of 18 participants provided a total of six urine samples in which Δ9-THCCOOH concentrations ≥15 ng/mL. All six specimens screened positive at a 20 ng/mL IA cutoff, and two of six screened positive at a 50 ng/mL cutoff. These data show that absorption/elimination of CBD is impacted by drug formulation, route of administration and gastric contents. Although pure CBD is unlikely to impact drug testing, it is possible that hemp products containing low amounts of Δ9-THC may produce a cannabis-positive urine drug test.
全球范围内,含大麻二酚(CBD)的产品市场正在蓬勃发展。然而,不同口服制剂中 CBD 的药代动力学以及 CBD 使用对大麻尿液药物检测结果(例如,11-去甲-9-羧基-Δ9-四氢大麻酚(Δ9-THCCOOH))的影响仍研究不足。本研究描述了健康成年人(n=18)吸入或口服(包括三种制剂:凝胶胶囊、药房级糖浆和 Epidiolex)CBD(100mg)以及吸入 CBD 为主的大麻(含 100mg CBD 和 3.7mg Δ9-THC)后的尿液药代动力学。一部分参与者(n=6)在禁食过夜(而非低脂早餐)后口服给予 CBD 糖浆。在住宅研究单位内,在给药前和给药后 58 小时采集尿液标本。采用免疫分析法(IA)进行 Δ9-THCCOOH 筛查(检测限:20、50 和 100ng/mL),并用 LC-MS-MS 完成对大麻素的定量。与吸入 CBD 相比,口服 CBD 后的尿液 CBD 浓度(ng/mL)更高(平均 Cmax:734;平均 Tmax:4.7h,n=18),口服药物制剂对平均 Cmax 有显著影响(Epidiolex=1274ng/mL,胶囊=776ng/mL,糖浆=151ng/mL,n=6/组),而 Tmax 差异较小。禁食对 CBD 的尿液排泄影响有限,在给予纯 CBD 的任何途径或制剂中,均未发现 CBD 向 Δ8-或 Δ9-THC 的转化。在急性给予以 CBD 为主的吸食大麻后,18 名参与者中有 3 名共提供了 6 份尿液样本,其中 Δ9-THCCOOH 浓度≥15ng/mL。所有 6 份标本在 20ng/mL IA 检测限下均呈阳性,6 份标本中有 2 份在 50ng/mL 检测限下呈阳性。这些数据表明,CBD 的吸收/消除受药物制剂、给药途径和胃内容物的影响。虽然纯 CBD 不太可能影响药物检测,但含有低剂量 Δ9-THC 的大麻类产品可能会导致尿液药物检测呈阳性。