• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

标准设定掌握法的响应向量。

The Response Vector for Mastery Method of Standard Setting.

作者信息

Dimitrov Dimiter M

机构信息

George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, USA.

National Center for Assessment, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

Educ Psychol Meas. 2022 Aug;82(4):719-746. doi: 10.1177/00131644211032388. Epub 2021 Jul 21.

DOI:10.1177/00131644211032388
PMID:35754616
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9228699/
Abstract

Proposed is a new method of standard setting referred to as response vector for mastery (RVM) method. Under the RVM method, the task of panelists that participate in the standard setting process does not involve conceptualization of a borderline examinee and probability judgments as it is the case with the Angoff and bookmark methods. Also, the RVM-based computation of a cut-score is not based on a single item (e.g., marked in an ordered item booklet) but, instead, on a response vector (1/0 scores) on items and their parameters calibrated in item response theory or under the recently developed -scoring method. Illustrations with hypothetical and real-data scenarios of standard setting are provided and methodological aspects of the RVM method are discussed.

摘要

提出了一种新的标准设定方法,称为掌握响应向量(RVM)法。在RVM方法下,参与标准设定过程的专家小组成员的任务不像安格夫法和书签法那样涉及界定边缘考生的概念和概率判断。此外,基于RVM的及格分数计算不是基于单个项目(例如,在有序项目手册中标记的项目),而是基于项目的响应向量(1/0分数)及其在项目反应理论或最近开发的-评分方法下校准的参数。文中提供了标准设定的假设和实际数据场景示例,并讨论了RVM方法的方法学方面。

相似文献

1
The Response Vector for Mastery Method of Standard Setting.标准设定掌握法的响应向量。
Educ Psychol Meas. 2022 Aug;82(4):719-746. doi: 10.1177/00131644211032388. Epub 2021 Jul 21.
2
Comparison of the validity of bookmark and Angoff standard setting methods in medical performance tests.书签法和 Angoff 标准设定法在医学绩效测试中有效性的比较。
BMC Med Educ. 2021 Jan 2;21(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02436-3.
3
Effect of Trainee Performance Data on Standard-Setting Judgments Using the Mastery Angoff Method.学员表现数据对使用掌握式安格夫法进行标准设定判断的影响。
J Grad Med Educ. 2018 Jun;10(3):301-305. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-17-00781.1.
4
Comparison of results between modified-Angoff and bookmark methods for estimating cut score of the Korean medical licensing examination.韩国医学执照考试及格分数估计中改良安格夫法与书签法结果的比较。
Korean J Med Educ. 2018 Dec;30(4):347-357. doi: 10.3946/kjme.2018.110. Epub 2018 Dec 1.
5
Setting performance standards for mannequin-based acute-care scenarios: an examinee-centered approach.为基于人体模型的急性护理场景设定性能标准:以考生为中心的方法。
Simul Healthc. 2008 Summer;3(2):72-81. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0b013e31816e39e2.
6
Bookmark locations and item response model selection in the presence of local item dependence.存在局部项目依赖时的书签位置与项目反应模型选择
J Appl Meas. 2007;8(1):65-83.
7
Reliability of a minimal competency score for an annual skills mastery assessment.年度技能掌握评估最低能力分数的可靠性。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2013 Dec 16;77(10):211. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7710211.
8
Comparison of standard-setting methods for the Korea Radiological technologist Licensing Examination : Angoff, Ebel, Bookmark, and Hofstee.韩国放射技师执照考试标准设定方法的比较:安格夫法、埃贝尔法、书签法和霍夫斯泰法。
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2018;15:32. doi: 10.3352/jeehp.2018.15.32. Epub 2018 Dec 26.
9
The Effect of Rating Unfamiliar Items on Angoff Passing Scores.对不熟悉项目进行评分对安格夫及格分数的影响。
Educ Psychol Meas. 2017 Dec;77(6):901-916. doi: 10.1177/0013164416670983. Epub 2016 Oct 10.
10
PRO-Angoff method for remote standard setting: establishing clinical thresholds for the upper digestive disease tool.用于远程标准设定的专家判断法:为上消化道疾病工具建立临床阈值
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2024 Mar 12;8(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s41687-024-00707-x.

本文引用的文献

1
Latent -Scoring Modeling: Estimation of Item and Person Parameters.潜在评分建模:项目参数和人员参数的估计
Educ Psychol Meas. 2021 Apr;81(2):388-404. doi: 10.1177/0013164420941147. Epub 2020 Jul 13.
2
The Delta-Scoring Method of Tests With Binary Items: A Note on True Score Estimation and Equating.具有二元项目的测试的德尔塔评分方法:关于真分数估计和等值的一则注释
Educ Psychol Meas. 2018 Oct;78(5):805-825. doi: 10.1177/0013164417724187. Epub 2017 Aug 4.
3
Modeling of Item Response Functions Under the -Scoring Method.-评分法下项目反应函数的建模
Educ Psychol Meas. 2020 Feb;80(1):126-144. doi: 10.1177/0013164419854176. Epub 2019 Jun 10.
4
Some Problems With the Analytical Argument in Support of RP67 in the Context of the Bookmark Standard Setting Method.在书签标准设定方法的背景下,支持RP67的分析论证存在的一些问题。
Appl Psychol Meas. 2019 Sep;43(6):481-492. doi: 10.1177/0146621618800272. Epub 2018 Oct 3.
5
An Approach to Scoring and Equating Tests With Binary Items: Piloting With Large-Scale Assessments.一种针对具有二元项目的测试进行评分和等值处理的方法:大规模评估试点
Educ Psychol Meas. 2016 Dec;76(6):954-975. doi: 10.1177/0013164416631100. Epub 2016 Feb 16.
6
A Mapmark method of standard setting as implemented for the National Assessment Governing Board.为国家评估管理委员会实施的一种标准设定的地图标记方法。
J Appl Meas. 2011;12(2):165-93.