Dibs Khaled, Blakaj Dukagjin M, Prasad Rahul N, Olausson Alexander, Bourekas Eric C, Boulter Daniel, Ayan Ahmet S, Cochran Eric, Marras William S, Mageswaran Prasath, Thomas Evan, Lee Hyeri, Grecula John, Raval Raju R, Mendel Ehud, Scharschmidt Thomas, Lonser Russell, Chakravarti Arnab, Elder James B, Palmer Joshua D
Department of Radiation Oncology, The James Cancer Hospital at the Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, United States.
Department of Radiology, The James Cancer Hospital at the Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, United States.
Front Oncol. 2022 Jun 8;12:912804. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.912804. eCollection 2022.
With survival improving in many metastatic malignancies, spine metastases have increasingly become a source of significant morbidity; achieving durable local control (LC) is critical. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) may offer improved LC and/or symptom palliation. However, due to setup concerns, SBRT is infrequently offered to patients with ≥3 contiguous involved levels. Because data are limited, we sought to evaluate the feasibility, toxicity, and cancer control outcomes of spine SBRT delivered to ≥3 contiguous levels.
We retrospectively identified all SBRT courses delivered between 2013 and 2019 at a tertiary care institution for postoperative or intact spine metastases. Radiotherapy was delivered to 14-35 Gy in 1-5 fractions. Patients were stratified by whether they received SBRT to 1-2 or ≥3 contiguous levels. The primary endpoint was 1-year LC and was compared between groups. Factors associated with increased likelihood of local failure (LF) were explored. Acute and chronic toxicity was assessed. In-depth dosimetric data were collected.
Overall, 165 patients with 194 SBRT courses were identified [54% were men, median age was 61 years, 93% had Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) ≥70, and median follow-up was 15 months]. One hundred thirteen patients (68%) received treatment to 1-2 and 52 to 3-7 (32%) levels. The 1-year LC was 88% (89% for 1-2 levels vs. 84% for ≥3 levels, p = 0.747). On multivariate analysis, uncontrolled systemic disease was associated with inferior LC for patients with ≥3 treated levels. No other demographic, disease, treatment, or dosimetric variables achieved significance. Rates of new/progressive fracture were equivalent (8% vs. 9.5%, p = 0.839). There were no radiation-induced myelopathy or grade 3+ acute or late toxicities in either group. Coverage of ≥95% of the planning target volume with ≥95% prescription dose was similar between groups (96% 1-2 levels vs. 89% ≥3 levels, p = 0.078).
For patients with ≥3 contiguous involved levels, spine SBRT is feasible and may offer excellent LC without significant toxicity. Prospective evaluation is warranted.
随着许多转移性恶性肿瘤患者生存率的提高,脊柱转移瘤日益成为严重发病的根源;实现持久的局部控制(LC)至关重要。立体定向体部放疗(SBRT)可能会改善局部控制和/或缓解症状。然而,由于摆位问题,很少为累及≥3个连续节段的患者提供SBRT。由于数据有限,我们试图评估对≥3个连续节段进行脊柱SBRT的可行性、毒性和癌症控制效果。
我们回顾性地确定了2013年至2019年在一家三级医疗机构为术后或完整脊柱转移瘤进行的所有SBRT疗程。放疗剂量为14 - 35 Gy,分1 - 5次给予。患者根据接受SBRT的节段数分为1 - 2个连续节段或≥3个连续节段两组。主要终点是1年局部控制率,并在两组之间进行比较。探讨与局部失败(LF)可能性增加相关的因素。评估急性和慢性毒性。收集深入的剂量学数据。
总体而言,共确定了165例患者的194个SBRT疗程[54%为男性,中位年龄61岁,93%的卡氏功能状态(KPS)≥70,中位随访时间为15个月]。113例患者(68%)接受了1 - 2个节段的治疗,52例患者(32%)接受了3 - 7个节段的治疗。1年局部控制率为88%(1 - 2个节段为89%,≥3个节段为84%,p = 0.747)。多因素分析显示,对于接受≥3个节段治疗的患者,未控制的全身疾病与较差的局部控制相关。没有其他人口统计学、疾病、治疗或剂量学变量具有统计学意义。新发/进行性骨折发生率相当(8%对9.5%,p = 0.839)。两组均未出现放射性脊髓病或3级及以上急性或晚期毒性反应。两组间计划靶体积≥95%被≥95%处方剂量覆盖的情况相似(1 - 2个节段为96%,≥3个节段为89%,p = 0.078)。
对于累及≥3个连续节段的患者,脊柱SBRT是可行的,且可能提供良好的局部控制,而无明显毒性。有必要进行前瞻性评估。