• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经导管主动脉瓣植入术治疗退化性外科主动脉生物瓣膜:一项系统评价。

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation for Degenerated Surgical Aortic Bioprosthesis: A Systematic Review.

作者信息

Sabbagh Abdallah El, Al-Hijji Mohammed, Guerrero Mayra

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA.

Department of Adult Cardiology, Heart Hospital, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.

出版信息

Heart Views. 2022 Jan-Mar;23(1):1-9. doi: 10.4103/heartviews.heartviews_25_22. Epub 2022 May 16.

DOI:10.4103/heartviews.heartviews_25_22
PMID:35757448
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9231545/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Transcatheter aortic valve in valve (Aviv) replacement has been shown to be an effective therapeutic option in patients with failed aortic bioprosthetic valves. This review intended to evaluate contemporary 1-year outcomes of Aviv in recent studies.

METHODS

A systematic review on outcomes of Aviv was performed using the best available evidence from studies obtained using a MEDLINE, Cochrane database, and SCOPUS search. Endpoints of interest were survival, coronary artery obstruction, prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM), stroke, pacemaker implantation, and structural valve deterioration.

RESULTS

A total of 3339 patients from 23 studies were included. Mean age was 68-80 years, 20%-50% were female, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons score ranged from 5.7 to 31.1. Thirty-day all-cause mortality ranged from 2% to 8%, and 1-year all-cause mortality ranged from 8% to 33%. Coronary artery obstruction risk after Aviv ranged from 0.6% to 4%. One-year stroke ranged from 2% to 8%. Moderate-severe PPM occurred in 11%-58%, and pacemaker rate at 1 year ranged from 5% to 12%.

CONCLUSION

Transcatheter aortic ViV has emerged as an effective therapeutic option to treat patients with failed bioprostheses. The acceptable complication rate and favorable 1-year outcomes make Aviv an appropriate alternative to redo surgical aortic valve replacement.

摘要

背景

经导管主动脉瓣中瓣(Aviv)置换术已被证明是主动脉生物瓣功能衰竭患者的一种有效治疗选择。本综述旨在评估近期研究中Aviv的当代1年结局。

方法

使用通过MEDLINE、Cochrane数据库和SCOPUS检索获得的研究中的最佳现有证据,对Aviv的结局进行系统评价。感兴趣的终点包括生存率、冠状动脉阻塞、人工瓣膜-患者不匹配(PPM)、中风、起搏器植入和结构性瓣膜退变。

结果

共纳入23项研究中的3339例患者。平均年龄为68 - 80岁,20% - 50%为女性,胸外科医师协会评分范围为5.7至31.1。30天全因死亡率为2%至8%,1年全因死亡率为8%至33%。Aviv术后冠状动脉阻塞风险为0.6%至4%。1年中风发生率为2%至8%。中度至重度PPM发生率为11%至58%,1年起搏器植入率为5%至12%。

结论

经导管主动脉瓣中瓣置换术已成为治疗生物瓣功能衰竭患者的一种有效治疗选择。可接受的并发症发生率和良好的1年结局使Aviv成为再次进行外科主动脉瓣置换术的合适替代方案。

相似文献

1
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation for Degenerated Surgical Aortic Bioprosthesis: A Systematic Review.经导管主动脉瓣植入术治疗退化性外科主动脉生物瓣膜:一项系统评价。
Heart Views. 2022 Jan-Mar;23(1):1-9. doi: 10.4103/heartviews.heartviews_25_22. Epub 2022 May 16.
2
What is the best approach in a patient with a failed aortic bioprosthetic valve: transcatheter aortic valve replacement or redo aortic valve replacement?对于主动脉生物人工瓣膜功能失效的患者,最佳治疗方法是什么:经导管主动脉瓣置换术还是再次主动脉瓣置换术?
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2015 Jun;20(6):837-43. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivv037. Epub 2015 Mar 8.
3
Transcatheter valve-in-valve versus redo surgical aortic valve replacement for the treatment of degenerated bioprosthetic aortic valve: A systematic review and meta-analysis.经导管瓣中瓣术与再次开胸主动脉瓣置换术治疗退行性生物瓣主动脉瓣的疗效比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Dec 1;92(7):1404-1411. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27686. Epub 2018 Jul 19.
4
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Within Degenerated Aortic Surgical Bioprostheses: PARTNER 2 Valve-in-Valve Registry.经导管主动脉瓣植入术在退行性主动脉外科生物瓣中的应用:PARTNER 2 瓣中瓣注册研究。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 May 9;69(18):2253-2262. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.02.057.
5
Valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement versus redo surgical valve replacement for degenerated bioprosthetic aortic valve: An updated meta-analysis comparing midterm outcomes.经导管主动脉瓣置换术治疗退行性生物瓣主动脉瓣与再次开胸换瓣术治疗退行性生物瓣主动脉瓣的对比:一项比较中期结果的更新荟萃分析。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Jun 1;97(7):1481-1488. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29541. Epub 2021 Feb 13.
6
Impact of Pre-Existing Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch on Survival Following Aortic Valve-in-Valve Procedures.人工生物瓣-患者不匹配对主动脉瓣瓣中瓣手术患者生存的影响。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Jan 22;11(2):133-141. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.08.039.
7
Valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement versus redo surgical aortic valve replacement: A systematic review and meta-analysis.经导管主动脉瓣置换术中瓣中瓣技术与再次开胸主动脉瓣置换术的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Card Surg. 2021 Jul;36(7):2486-2495. doi: 10.1111/jocs.15546. Epub 2021 Apr 2.
8
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in failed bioprosthetic surgical valves.经导管主动脉瓣植入术治疗失败的生物瓣。
JAMA. 2014 Jul;312(2):162-70. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.7246.
9
Meta-analysis comparing valve-in-valve TAVR and redo-SAVR in patients with degenerated bioprosthetic aortic valve.比较生物人工主动脉瓣退变患者行瓣中瓣经导管主动脉瓣置换术和再次外科主动脉瓣置换术的荟萃分析。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Nov 1;98(5):940-947. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29789. Epub 2021 Jun 10.
10
Comparative performance of transcatheter aortic valve-in-valve implantation versus conventional surgical redo aortic valve replacement in patients with degenerated aortic valve bioprostheses: systematic review and meta-analysis.经导管主动脉瓣瓣中瓣植入术与传统再次主动脉瓣置换术治疗退行性生物瓣主动脉瓣患者的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2018 Mar 1;53(3):495-504. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezx347.

引用本文的文献

1
Short- and Medium-Term Outcomes Comparison of Native- and Valve-in-Valve TAVI Procedures.经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVI)中自体瓣膜与瓣中瓣手术的短期和中期结果比较
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Sep 18;24(9):255. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2409255. eCollection 2023 Sep.
2
Redo-TAVR: Essential Concepts, Updated Data and Current Gaps in Evidence.再次经导管主动脉瓣置换术:基本概念、最新数据及当前证据空白
J Clin Med. 2023 Jul 20;12(14):4788. doi: 10.3390/jcm12144788.

本文引用的文献

1
A randomized evaluation of the TriGuard™ HDH cerebral embolic protection device to Reduce the Impact of Cerebral Embolic LEsions after TransCatheter Aortic Valve ImplanTation: the REFLECT I trial.TriGuard™ HDH 脑保护装置降低经导管主动脉瓣植入术后脑栓塞病变影响的随机评估:REFLECT I 试验。
Eur Heart J. 2021 Jul 15;42(27):2670-2679. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab213.
2
Preventing Coronary Obstruction During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Results From the Multicenter International BASILICA Registry.经导管主动脉瓣置换术中预防冠状动脉阻塞:多中心国际 BASILICA 注册研究结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 May 10;14(9):941-948. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.02.035. Epub 2021 Mar 6.
3
Transcatheter Replacement of Transcatheter Versus Surgically Implanted Aortic Valve Bioprostheses.
经导管置换 versus 外科植入的主动脉瓣生物假体。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021 Jan 5;77(1):1-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.10.053.
4
National Trends in Mechanical Valve Replacement in Patients Aged 50 to 70 Years.50至70岁患者机械瓣膜置换的全国趋势。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Dec 1;76(22):2687-2688. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.09.608.
5
Long term follow up of percutaneous treatment for degenerated Mitroflow prosthesis with self-expanding transcatheter aortic valve implantation.经皮治疗退化的Mitroflow人工心脏瓣膜并进行自膨胀经导管主动脉瓣植入术的长期随访
Ann Transl Med. 2020 Aug;8(15):955. doi: 10.21037/atm.2020.02.120.
6
Transcarotid Versus Subclavian/Axillary Access for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement With SAPIEN 3.经颈动脉途径与经锁骨下动脉/腋动脉途径行经导管主动脉瓣置换术治疗 SAPIEN 3 瓣膜的比较。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2020 Dec;110(6):1892-1897. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.05.141. Epub 2020 Jul 24.
7
Valve-in-Valve for Degenerated Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Versus Valve-in-Valve for Degenerated Surgical Aortic Bioprostheses: A 3-Center Comparison of Hemodynamic and 1-Year Outcome.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后瓣中瓣治疗与外科生物瓣衰败后瓣中瓣治疗:三个中心血流动力学和 1 年结果比较。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Jul 21;9(14):e013973. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.013973. Epub 2020 Jul 9.
8
Chimney Stenting for Coronary Occlusion During TAVR: Insights From the Chimney Registry.经导管主动脉瓣置换术中冠状动脉闭塞的烟囱支架置入术:烟囱注册研究的见解。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Mar 23;13(6):751-761. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.01.227.
9
Femoral transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation as alternative strategy for failed aortic bioprostheses: A single-centre experience with long-term follow-up.经导管股动脉瓣中瓣植入术作为主动脉生物瓣衰败的替代治疗策略:单中心长期随访经验。
Int J Cardiol. 2020 May 1;306:25-34. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.02.035. Epub 2020 Feb 13.
10
Valve-in-Valve Implantation Using the ACURATE Neo in Degenerated Aortic Bioprostheses: An International Multicenter Analysis.经瓣中瓣植入术在退行性主动脉生物瓣中的应用:一项国际多中心分析。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Nov 25;12(22):2309-2316. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.07.042.