Department of Special Education, Faculty of Education, Gaziantep University, Gaziantep, Turkey.
Department of Special Education, Faculty of Education, Anadolu University, Eskisehir, Turkey.
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2024 Feb;19(2):325-344. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2022.2087772. Epub 2022 Jun 26.
The rapid technological advances, the traits of individuals with ASD and their interest in technology are promising for the instruction of social skills to individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) using various technological interventions. Robotic interventions are among these. However, although robotics is frequently used with individuals with ASD, there is a limited number of reviews on social skills instruction and methods. The present study aimed to conduct a comprehensive descriptive analysis on single-case experimental designs where social skills were instructed to individuals with ASD and social robots were included as independent variables.
Thirteen single-case experimental designs published in peer-reviewed journals in which social skills were taught to individuals with ASD using social robots were reviewed with a comprehensive descriptive analysis based on five categories: (a) key characteristics, (b) methodological characteristics, (c) findings, (d) data analysis, and (e) key parameters in single-case experimental designs.
Social robots are generally effective in the instruction of social skills. Several social skills (e.g., making eye contact, social interaction, simple greetings) were instructed in the studies. Humanoid robots and NAO were used generally. The study data were predominantly analyzed statistically. There were several problems in research based on the basic parameters in single-case experimental designs.
The researches in this study differ in several respects (e.g., results, data analysis, and dependent variable). Thus, there is still a need for several robotics studies in the instruction of social skills. IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONThis study will be a guide for teachers who currently use robots in their classrooms but do not know which skills to use in teaching and how to use them functionally, as it shows applied research with robots.The findings of this research will show implementers working with children with ASD that technological tools can be used in rehabilitation environments, and that teachers can take a place in their robots in interventions for children with ASD, giving them a different perspective.It will be seen that the education of children with ASD is not only 1:1 and with humans, but robots can also provide education. In this way, the power of technology in teaching will become clearer. Especially in rehabilitation.Finally, this research will offer new options in teaching especially for teachers who aim at teaching social skills and will give them the opportunity to comprehensively examine the processes of different studies on these subjects.
快速的技术进步、自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)个体的特征以及他们对技术的兴趣,为使用各种技术干预措施对 ASD 个体进行社交技能教学提供了广阔的前景。机器人干预就是其中之一。然而,尽管机器人技术经常被用于 ASD 个体,但关于社交技能教学和方法的综述却很少。本研究旨在对使用社交机器人教授 ASD 个体社交技能的单病例实验设计进行全面的描述性分析。
对发表在同行评议期刊上的 13 项单病例实验设计进行了综述,这些设计使用社交机器人对 ASD 个体进行了社交技能教学,并基于以下五个类别进行了全面的描述性分析:(a)关键特征;(b)方法学特征;(c)发现;(d)数据分析;(e)单病例实验设计的关键参数。
社交机器人在教授社交技能方面通常是有效的。在这些研究中,教授了多种社交技能(例如,眼神交流、社交互动、简单问候)。通常使用人形机器人和 NAO。研究数据主要进行了统计分析。基于单病例实验设计的基本参数,研究中存在一些问题。
本研究中的研究在几个方面存在差异(例如,结果、数据分析和因变量)。因此,在社交技能教学中仍然需要进行更多的机器人研究。
本研究将为目前在课堂上使用机器人但不知道教授哪些技能以及如何进行功能教学的教师提供指导,因为它展示了具有机器人的应用研究。本研究的结果将向与 ASD 儿童一起工作的实施者表明,技术工具可以在康复环境中使用,并且教师可以在 ASD 儿童的干预中在机器人中占据一席之地,为他们提供不同的视角。可以看出,对 ASD 儿童的教育不仅是 1:1 与人类,机器人也可以提供教育。通过这种方式,教学中的技术力量将更加清晰。特别是在康复方面。最后,本研究将在教学中提供新的选择,特别是对于旨在教授社交技能的教师,并为他们提供机会全面研究这些主题的不同研究过程。