Parenting and Special Education Research Unit.
Centre for the Social Study of Migration and Refugees.
Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2022;92(5):599-615. doi: 10.1037/ort0000628. Epub 2022 Jun 27.
This study evaluated the effects of a school-based creative expression program on mental health and classroom social relationships in elementary school children with refugee and nonrefugee migration backgrounds. It was hypothesized that children receiving the intervention would report less externalizing and internalizing problem behaviors, less posttraumatic functioning, and more positive classroom social relationships at posttest than children receiving education as usual, particularly for refugee children. Classes in three multiethnic Belgian elementary schools were randomly assigned to a creative intervention (7 classes, 68 students) or control condition (6 classes, 52 students). All participants (8-12 years old) had a migration background. Almost half (47%) were refugees, 53% were first- to third-generation nonrefugee immigrants. Data collection included pre- and posttest assessment with children, parents, and teachers. Multilevel analysis was used to assess outcomes. Children in the intervention condition rated the classroom climate at posttest more positive than their control peers ( = .33). Children who received the intervention did not show less symptomatic functioning than children in the education-as-usual condition. However, post hoc analysis by baseline severity showed that students with high baseline levels of posttraumatic stress reported less trauma symptoms at posttest in the intervention group than in the control group ( = -.97). This effect was moderated by children's refugee background, indicating a differential effect in which refugee children show more reduction of trauma symptoms as compared to nonrefugee immigrant children. The intervention supported classroom climate and alleviated posttraumatic stress in children with increased posttraumatic symptomatology. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).
本研究评估了一项基于学校的创意表达计划对有难民和非难民移民背景的小学生心理健康和课堂社交关系的影响。研究假设,接受干预的儿童在posttest 时报告的外化和内化问题行为较少,创伤后功能障碍较少,课堂社交关系更为积极,而接受常规教育的儿童则没有这种情况,尤其是对难民儿童。三所多民族比利时小学的班级被随机分配到创意干预组(7 个班,68 名学生)或对照组(6 个班,52 名学生)。所有参与者(8-12 岁)都有移民背景。近一半(47%)是难民,53%是第一代至第三代非难民移民。数据收集包括对儿童、家长和教师进行 pre- 和 posttest 评估。采用多层次分析评估结果。干预组的儿童在 posttest 时对课堂氛围的评价比对照组的同伴更为积极( =.33)。接受干预的儿童与接受常规教育的儿童相比,症状表现没有减少。然而,根据基线严重程度的事后分析表明,基线创伤后应激水平较高的学生在干预组的 posttest 中报告的创伤症状少于对照组( = -.97)。这种效果受儿童难民背景的调节,表明在干预组中,难民儿童的创伤症状减少程度大于非难民移民儿童。该干预措施支持课堂氛围,并减轻了有创伤后症状的儿童的创伤后应激。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2022 APA,保留所有权利)。