• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较动机性简短干预措施以改善吸烟者健康行为(COSMOS 研究):一般实践中的实用聚类随机两臂试验。

Comparison of Motivational Short Interventions to Improve Smokers' Health Behavior (The COSMOS Study): A Pragmatic Cluster-Randomized Two-Arm Trial in General Practice.

机构信息

Institute of Primary Care, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

出版信息

Nicotine Tob Res. 2023 Jan 1;25(1):102-110. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntac159.

DOI:10.1093/ntr/ntac159
PMID:35759949
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Helping smokers to quit is an important task of general practitioners (GPs). However, achieving tobacco abstinence is difficult, and smokers who fail may still want to improve their health in other ways. Therefore, Swiss GPs developed a multithematic coaching concept that encourages health behavior changes beyond smoking cessation alone.

AIMS AND METHODS

To compare the effectiveness of such coaching with state-of-the-art smoking cessation counseling, we conducted a pragmatic cluster-randomized two-arm trial with 56 GPs in German-speaking Switzerland and 149 of their cigarette smoking patients. GPs were instructed in either multithematic health coaching or smoking cessation counseling. After 12 months, we compared their patients' improvements in cigarette consumption, body weight, physical inactivity, alcohol consumption, stress, unhealthy diet, and a health behavior of their own choice, using hierarchical logistic regression models and Fisher's exact and t tests.

RESULTS

Over 95% of all participants achieved clinically relevant improvements in at least one health behavior, with no difference between study arms (health coaching vs. smoking cessation counseling: aOR = 1.21, 95% CI = [0.03-50.76]; and aOR = 1.78, 95% CI = [0.51-6.25] after non-responder imputation). Rates of clinically relevant improvements in the individual health behaviors did not differ between study arms either (they were most frequent in physical activity, achieved by 3 out of 4 patients), nor did the extent of the improvements.

CONCLUSIONS

Multithematic health coaching and state-of-the art smoking cessation counseling were found to be comparable interventions, both in terms of smoking cessation success and, quite unexpectedly, their effects on other health behaviors.

IMPLICATIONS

The findings of our study suggest that in general practice, multithematic health coaching is an effective smoking cessation intervention, and conversely, monothematic smoking cessation counseling also achieves the beneficial effects of a multithematic health behavior intervention. This opens up the possibility for GPs to support their smoking patients in improving their health behavior in additional and more flexible ways.

摘要

引言

帮助吸烟者戒烟是全科医生(GP)的一项重要任务。然而,实现烟草戒除是困难的,未能成功戒烟的吸烟者可能仍希望以其他方式改善健康。因此,瑞士的全科医生开发了一种多主题的辅导概念,鼓励除了戒烟之外的健康行为改变。

目的和方法

为了比较这种辅导与最先进的戒烟咨询的效果,我们在瑞士德语区的 56 名全科医生和他们的 149 名吸烟患者中进行了一项实用的两臂随机分组试验。全科医生接受了多主题健康辅导或戒烟咨询方面的指导。12 个月后,我们使用分层逻辑回归模型和 Fisher 精确检验和 t 检验比较了他们的患者在吸烟量、体重、身体活动不足、饮酒、压力、不健康饮食以及他们自己选择的健康行为方面的改善情况。

结果

超过 95%的参与者在至少一种健康行为方面取得了有临床意义的改善,研究组之间没有差异(健康辅导与戒烟咨询:aOR = 1.21,95%CI = [0.03-50.76];非应答者推断后 aOR = 1.78,95%CI = [0.51-6.25])。研究组之间在个别健康行为方面有临床意义的改善率也没有差异(最常见的是身体活动,4 名患者中有 3 名达到),改善的程度也没有差异。

结论

多主题健康辅导和最先进的戒烟咨询被发现是可比的干预措施,无论是在戒烟成功方面,还是在其他健康行为方面,都有相当的效果。

意义

我们的研究结果表明,在全科实践中,多主题健康辅导是一种有效的戒烟干预措施,反之,单一主题的戒烟咨询也能达到多主题健康行为干预的有益效果。这为全科医生提供了支持他们的吸烟患者以额外的、更灵活的方式改善健康行为的可能性。

相似文献

1
Comparison of Motivational Short Interventions to Improve Smokers' Health Behavior (The COSMOS Study): A Pragmatic Cluster-Randomized Two-Arm Trial in General Practice.比较动机性简短干预措施以改善吸烟者健康行为(COSMOS 研究):一般实践中的实用聚类随机两臂试验。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2023 Jan 1;25(1):102-110. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntac159.
2
Efficacy of motivating short interventions for smokers in primary care (COSMOS trial): study protocol for a cluster-RCT.初级保健中针对吸烟者的激励性短期干预措施的效果(COSMOS试验):一项整群随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2019 Jan 25;20(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-3071-z.
3
A pilot randomised trial to assess the methods and procedures for evaluating the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of Exercise Assisted Reduction then Stop (EARS) among disadvantaged smokers.一项评估运动辅助戒烟(EARS)对弱势吸烟者的临床效果和成本效益的方法和程序的初步随机试验。
Health Technol Assess. 2014 Jan;18(4):1-324. doi: 10.3310/hta18040.
4
Does Smoking Intensity Predict Cessation Rates? A Study of Light-Intermittent, Light-Daily, and Heavy Smokers Enrolled in Two Telephone-Based Counseling Interventions.吸烟强度是否可预测戒烟率?基于电话咨询的两种干预措施中,轻度间歇性、轻度每日和重度吸烟者的研究。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2020 Mar 16;22(3):423-430. doi: 10.1093/ntr/nty257.
5
Efficacy of resident training in smoking cessation: a randomized, controlled trial of a program based on application of behavioral theory and practice with standardized patients.住院医师戒烟培训的效果:一项基于行为理论应用及标准化病人实践的项目的随机对照试验
Ann Intern Med. 2002 Mar 19;136(6):429-37. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-136-6-200203190-00006.
6
Combining default choices and an encounter decision aid to improve tobacco cessation in primary care patients: protocol for a cluster-randomized trial.结合默认选择和就诊决策辅助工具提高初级保健患者的戒烟效果:一项集群随机试验方案。
BMC Prim Care. 2022 Sep 24;23(1):246. doi: 10.1186/s12875-022-01859-9.
7
Incentives for smoking cessation.戒烟的激励措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 May 18(5):CD004307. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004307.pub5.
8
One-hour training for general practitioners in reducing the implementation gap of smoking cessation care: a cluster-randomized controlled trial.全科医生减少戒烟护理实施差距的 1 小时培训:一项集群随机对照试验。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2014 Jan;16(1):1-10. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntt100. Epub 2013 Jul 19.
9
Twelve-Month Outcomes of a Group-Randomized Community Health Advocate-Led Smoking Cessation Intervention in Public Housing.社区健康倡导员主导的戒烟干预措施:一项为期 12 个月的群组随机对照试验结果。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2018 Nov 15;20(12):1434-1441. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntx193.
10
E-cigarettes May Support Smokers With High Smoking-Related Risk Awareness to Stop Smoking in the Short Run: Preliminary Results by Randomized Controlled Trial.电子烟可能有助于高吸烟相关风险意识的吸烟者在短期内戒烟:随机对照试验的初步结果。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2019 Jan 1;21(1):119-126. doi: 10.1093/ntr/nty047.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness of behavioural interventions with motivational interviewing on physical activity outcomes in adults: systematic review and meta-analysis.行为干预结合动机式访谈对成年人身体活动效果的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ. 2024 Jul 10;386:e078713. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2023-078713.