Suppr超能文献

脊髓刺激失败后,背根神经节刺激作为一种挽救疗法。

Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation as a Salvage Therapy Following Failed Spinal Cord Stimulation.

作者信息

Chapman Kenneth B, Spiegel Matthew A, van Helmond Noud, Patel Kiran V, Yang Ajax, Yousef Tariq A, Mandelberg Nataniel, Deer Timothy, Mogilner Alon Y

机构信息

The Spine & Pain Institute of New York, New York, NY, USA; Department of Anesthesiology, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Anesthesiology, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, New York, NY, USA.

The Spine & Pain Institute of New York, New York, NY, USA; Department of Anesthesiology, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

Neuromodulation. 2022 Oct;25(7):1024-1032. doi: 10.1016/j.neurom.2022.04.050. Epub 2022 Jun 25.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) can provide long-term pain relief for various chronic pain conditions, but some patients have no relief with trial stimulation or lose efficacy over time. To "salvage" relief in patients who do not respond or have lost efficacy, alternative stimulation paradigms or anatomical targets can be considered. Dorsal root ganglion stimulation (DRG-S) has a different mechanism of action and anatomical target than SCS.

OBJECTIVES

We assessed DRG-S salvage therapy outcomes in patients who did not respond to SCS or had lost SCS efficacy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively included consecutive patients from 2016 to 2020 who were salvaged with DRG-S after failed SCS trials (<50% pain reduction) or who had lost efficacy after permanent SCS. We compared numerical rating scale (NRS) pain, Oswestry disability index (ODI), health-related quality of life (EuroQol five-dimensions five-level), and oral morphine equivalent (OME) opioid requirements before DRG-S salvage and at patients' last follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 60 patients who had failed SCS were salvaged with DRG-S. The mean age was 56 ± 12 years, and the most common diagnoses were complex regional pain syndrome (n = 24) and failed back surgery syndrome (n = 24). The most common failed modalities included tonic (n = 32), Burst (n = 18), and high-frequency (n = 10) SCS. The median follow-up duration of salvage DRG-S was 34 months. With DRG-S, NRS decreased (8.7 ± 1.2 to 3.8 ± 2.1), and OME declined (median 23 mg to median 15 mg), whereas EuroQol 5D scores increased (0.40 ± 0.15 to 0.71 ± 0.15), and ODI improved (64 ± 14% to 31 ± 18%) (all p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

DRG-S can be used in patients with chronic pain who have previously failed to receive persistent benefit from SCS.

摘要

引言

脊髓刺激(SCS)可为各种慢性疼痛病症提供长期疼痛缓解,但一些患者在试验性刺激时无缓解或随时间推移失去疗效。为了“挽救”对治疗无反应或已失去疗效的患者的疼痛缓解效果,可以考虑替代刺激模式或解剖靶点。背根神经节刺激(DRG-S)与SCS具有不同的作用机制和解剖靶点。

目的

我们评估了DRG-S挽救疗法在对SCS无反应或已失去SCS疗效的患者中的治疗效果。

材料与方法

我们回顾性纳入了2016年至2020年期间的连续患者,这些患者在SCS试验失败(疼痛减轻<50%)后接受了DRG-S挽救治疗,或在永久性SCS后失去疗效。我们比较了在DRG-S挽救治疗前和患者最后一次随访时的数字评分量表(NRS)疼痛评分、Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)、健康相关生活质量(欧洲五维健康量表)和口服吗啡等效剂量(OME)阿片类药物需求量。

结果

共有60例SCS治疗失败的患者接受了DRG-S挽救治疗。平均年龄为56±12岁,最常见的诊断为复杂性区域疼痛综合征(n = 24)和腰椎手术失败综合征(n = 24)。最常见的失败模式包括持续性(n = 32)、爆发性(n = 18)和高频(n = 10)SCS。挽救性DRG-S的中位随访时间为34个月。采用DRG-S治疗后,NRS评分降低(8.7±1.2降至3.8±2.1),OME剂量下降(中位数从23 mg降至中位数15 mg),而欧洲五维健康量表评分升高(0.40±0.15升至0.71±0.15),ODI改善(64±14%降至31±18%)(所有p<0.05)。

结论

DRG-S可用于先前未能从SCS中持续获益的慢性疼痛患者。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验