Suppr超能文献

对比增强 MRI 对胰腺导管腺癌的血管侵犯和可切除性的评估:与胰腺协议 CT 的比较。

Vascular involvement and resectability of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma on contrast-enhanced MRI: comparison with pancreatic protocol CT.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Gifu University, 1-1 Yanagido, Gifu, 501-1194, Japan.

Innovative and Clinical Research Promotion Center, Gifu University Hospital, 1-1 Yanagido, Gifu, 501-1194, Japan.

出版信息

Abdom Radiol (NY). 2022 Aug;47(8):2835-2844. doi: 10.1007/s00261-022-03581-7. Epub 2022 Jun 27.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the diagnostic performance for detecting vascular involvement and determining resectability differences regarding pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) between contrast-enhanced CT and MRI.

METHODS

This retrospective study evaluated 82 patients (73 years, 46 men) with PDAC who underwent both preoperative contrast-enhanced CT and MRI from January 2008 to March 2021. Two radiologists independently categorized vascular involvements for celiac, superior mesenteric, splenic, and common hepatic arteries, and portal, superior mesenteric, and splenic veins into no tumor contact, solid soft-tissue contact ≤ 180°, or solid soft-tissue contact > 180°. The radiologists also classified resectability into resectable, borderline resectable, or locally advanced. Receiver-operating-characteristic (ROC) analysis was conducted to evaluate the diagnostic performances for detecting vascular involvements which were confirmed by pathological or intraoperative findings. The proportion of resectability classifications was compared between CT and MRI by the Fisher's exact test.

RESULTS

No statistical difference was found in the diagnostic performances for detecting vascular involvement in CT (area under the ROC curve [AUC], 0.50-0.89) and MRI (AUC, 0.51-0.75) (P = 0.06-> 0.99). Resectability on CT were 79% and 68%, 20% and 26%, and 1% and 6% for resectable, borderline resectable, and locally advanced tumors for reviewers 1 and 2; those on MRI were 87% and 81%, 12% and 13%, and 1% and 6%, respectively. The proportion of resectability classifications was not different between CT and MRI (P = 0.48 and = 0.15 for reviewers 1 and 2, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The diagnostic performance for detecting vascular involvement and determining resectability of PDAC on contrast-enhanced MRI were comparable with pancreatic protocol CT.

摘要

目的

比较对比增强 CT 和 MRI 检测胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)血管侵犯和确定可切除性的诊断性能。

方法

本回顾性研究纳入了 2008 年 1 月至 2021 年 3 月间行术前对比增强 CT 和 MRI 的 82 例 PDAC 患者(73 岁,46 名男性)。两名放射科医生分别对腹腔动脉、肠系膜上动脉、脾动脉和肝总动脉,以及门静脉、肠系膜上静脉和脾静脉进行分类,分为无肿瘤接触、实质软组织接触≤180°或实质软组织接触>180°。放射科医生还将可切除性分为可切除、边界可切除和局部进展。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)分析评估通过病理或术中发现证实的血管侵犯的诊断性能。采用 Fisher 确切检验比较 CT 和 MRI 之间的可切除性分类比例。

结果

CT(ROC 曲线下面积[AUC],0.50-0.89)和 MRI(AUC,0.51-0.75)在检测血管侵犯的诊断性能方面无统计学差异(P=0.06->0.99)。对于两位阅片者,CT 的可切除性分别为 79%和 68%,边界可切除性分别为 20%和 26%,局部进展性分别为 1%和 6%;MRI 的可切除性分别为 87%和 81%,边界可切除性分别为 12%和 13%,局部进展性分别为 1%和 6%。CT 和 MRI 的可切除性分类比例无差异(对于两位阅片者,P=0.48 和 0.15)。

结论

胰腺协议 CT 和对比增强 MRI 检测 PDAC 血管侵犯和确定可切除性的诊断性能相当。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验