Department of Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Naresuan University, Phitsanulok, 65000, Thailand.
Center of Excellence for Environmental Health and Toxicology, Naresuan University, Phitsanulok, Thailand.
Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet. 2022 Sep;47(5):667-676. doi: 10.1007/s13318-022-00774-9. Epub 2022 Jun 27.
Nonadherence to levetiracetam (LEV) use can result in subtherapeutic concentrations and increase the risk of the occurrence of seizures. The impact of missing LEV doses on its pharmacokinetics and evidence of the appropriate remedial dose is lacking. This study has determined the influence of missed LEV doses on its pharmacokinetics and has explored the appropriate remedial dosage regimens.
Monte Carlo simulation was used to assess the impacts of different remedial dosage regimens on LEV concentrations. Simulated LEV concentrations outside the individual therapeutic range were calculated for the compliance scenario and for each of the remedial dosage regimens. The percentage of deviation from the full compliance scenario was also calculated. The regimen with the lowest percentage of deviation was considered the most appropriate.
The suitable LEV remedial dose varied across the delay times. For one missed dose, a remedial regimen with a regular dose followed by the usual dose was suitable for a delay time of less than 6 h, while a replacement with a regular dose followed by a partial dose appeared to be appropriate for a delay time of 6 h and longer. This was justified based on the concerns of LEV toxicity when the remedial dose is close to the next scheduled dose. For two consecutive missed doses, a remedial dose with one and a half of the regular dose was suitable if the gap between that and the next dose was greater than 6 h.
The appropriate remedial dosage regimen for one and two consecutive missed doses of LEV have been proposed. These remedial regimens, however, should be applied with clinicians' judgment based on the clinical status of the patients.
左乙拉西坦(LEV)用药不依从可导致治疗浓度不足,并增加癫痫发作的风险。目前尚缺乏关于漏服 LEV 剂量对其药代动力学的影响以及适当补救剂量的证据。本研究旨在确定漏服 LEV 剂量对其药代动力学的影响,并探讨适当的补救剂量方案。
采用蒙特卡罗模拟评估不同补救剂量方案对 LEV 浓度的影响。计算依从性方案和每种补救剂量方案下个体治疗范围外的模拟 LEV 浓度。还计算了与完全依从性方案的偏差百分比。偏差百分比最低的方案被认为是最合适的。
合适的 LEV 补救剂量随延迟时间而变化。对于漏服一剂,对于延迟时间小于 6 h,常规剂量后加用常规剂量的补救方案较为合适;而对于延迟时间为 6 h 及以上,常规剂量后加用部分剂量的补救方案似乎更为合适。这是基于对补救剂量接近下一次计划剂量时 LEV 毒性的担忧。对于连续漏服两剂,如果与下一次剂量的间隔大于 6 h,则一剂和半常规剂量的补救剂量较为合适。
本研究提出了漏服一剂和两剂 LEV 的适当补救剂量方案。然而,这些补救方案应根据患者的临床状况,结合临床医生的判断进行应用。