• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

子宫内膜消融术联合左炔诺孕酮宫内缓释系统与单纯子宫内膜消融术治疗月经过多妇女的多中心随机对照研究方案; MIRA2 试验。

Endometrial ablation plus levonorgestrel releasing intrauterine system versus endometrial ablation alone in women with heavy menstrual bleeding: study protocol of a multicentre randomised controlled trial; MIRA2 trial.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Máxima Medical Centre, Postbox 7777, 5500 MB, Veldhoven, The Netherlands.

Research School Grow, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

BMC Womens Health. 2022 Jun 27;22(1):257. doi: 10.1186/s12905-022-01843-6.

DOI:10.1186/s12905-022-01843-6
PMID:35761328
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9235075/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

It is estimated that between 12 to 25% of women who undergo an endometrial ablation for heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) are dissatisfied after two years because of recurrent menstrual bleeding and/or cyclical pelvic pain, with around 15% of these women ultimately having a hysterectomy. The insertion of a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) immediately after endometrial ablation may inactivate residual untreated endometrium and/or inhibit the regeneration of endometrial tissue. Furthermore, the LNG-IUS may prevent agglutination of the uterine walls preventing intrauterine adhesion formation associated with endometrial ablation. In these ways, insertion of an LNG-IUS immediately after endometrial ablation might prevent subsequent hysterectomies because of persisting uterine bleeding and cyclical pelvic pain or pain that arises de novo. Hence, we evaluate if the combination of endometrial ablation and an LNG-IUS is superior to endometrial ablation alone in terms of reducing subsequent rates of hysterectomy at two years following the initial ablative procedure.

METHODS/DESIGN: We perform a multicentre randomised controlled trial in 35 hospitals in the Netherlands. Women with heavy menstrual bleeding, who opt for treatment with endometrial ablation and without contraindication for an LNG-IUS are eligible. After informed consent, participants are randomly allocated to either endometrial ablation plus LNG-IUS or endometrial ablation alone. The primary outcome is the hysterectomy rate at 24 months following endometrial ablation. Secondary outcomes include women's satisfaction, reinterventions, complications, side effects, menstrual bleeding patterns, quality of life, societal costs.

DISCUSSION

The results of this study will help clinicians inform women with HMB who opt for treatment with endometrial ablation about whether concomitant use of the LNG-IUS is beneficial for reducing the need for hysterectomy due to ongoing bleeding and/or pain symptoms. Trial registration Dutch Trial registration: NL7817. Registered 20 June 2019, https://www.trialregister.nl/trial/7817 .

摘要

背景

据估计,有 12%至 25%的因月经过多而行子宫内膜消融术的女性在两年后会因再次出现月经出血和/或周期性盆腔疼痛而感到不满,其中约 15%的女性最终行子宫切除术。在子宫内膜消融术后立即放置左炔诺孕酮宫内节育系统(LNG-IUS)可使未治疗的子宫内膜失活和/或抑制子宫内膜组织再生。此外,LNG-IUS 可防止子宫壁粘连,防止与子宫内膜消融相关的宫腔粘连形成。通过这些方式,在子宫内膜消融术后立即放置 LNG-IUS 可能会预防因持续子宫出血和周期性盆腔疼痛或新出现的疼痛而导致的后续子宫切除术。因此,我们评估了子宫内膜消融术联合 LNG-IUS 是否优于单纯子宫内膜消融术,以降低初始消融术后两年内的子宫切除术后续发生率。

方法/设计:我们在荷兰的 35 家医院进行了一项多中心随机对照试验。选择行子宫内膜消融术且无 LNG-IUS 禁忌证的月经过多女性符合入组条件。在获得知情同意后,参与者被随机分配至子宫内膜消融术+LNG-IUS 组或单纯子宫内膜消融术组。主要结局是子宫内膜消融术后 24 个月的子宫切除术率。次要结局包括女性满意度、再次干预、并发症、副作用、月经出血模式、生活质量、社会成本。

讨论

本研究的结果将帮助临床医生向选择行子宫内膜消融术治疗的 HMB 女性提供信息,了解是否联合使用 LNG-IUS 是否有助于减少因持续出血和/或疼痛症状而需要行子宫切除术。

试验注册

荷兰试验注册:NL7817。注册日期:2019 年 6 月 20 日,https://www.trialregister.nl/trial/7817。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/708e/9235075/101625ae6442/12905_2022_1843_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/708e/9235075/101625ae6442/12905_2022_1843_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/708e/9235075/101625ae6442/12905_2022_1843_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Endometrial ablation plus levonorgestrel releasing intrauterine system versus endometrial ablation alone in women with heavy menstrual bleeding: study protocol of a multicentre randomised controlled trial; MIRA2 trial.子宫内膜消融术联合左炔诺孕酮宫内缓释系统与单纯子宫内膜消融术治疗月经过多妇女的多中心随机对照研究方案; MIRA2 试验。
BMC Womens Health. 2022 Jun 27;22(1):257. doi: 10.1186/s12905-022-01843-6.
2
Progesterone or progestogen-releasing intrauterine systems for heavy menstrual bleeding.用于治疗月经过多的孕激素或释放孕激素的宫内节育系统。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Apr 30(4):CD002126. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002126.pub3.
3
Progestogen-releasing intrauterine systems for heavy menstrual bleeding.含孕激素的宫内节育系统用于治疗月经过多。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jun 12;6(6):CD002126. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002126.pub4.
4
Progesterone or progestogen-releasing intrauterine systems for heavy menstrual bleeding.用于治疗月经过多的孕激素或释放孕激素的宫内节育系统。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Oct 19(4):CD002126. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002126.pub2.
5
Endometrial ablation or resection versus levonorgestrel intra-uterine system for the treatment of women with heavy menstrual bleeding and a normal uterine cavity: a systematic review with meta-analysis.子宫内膜消融或切除术与左炔诺孕酮宫内节育系统治疗宫腔正常的月经过多妇女:系统评价与荟萃分析。
Hum Reprod Update. 2020 Feb 28;26(2):302-311. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmz051.
6
Surgery versus medical therapy for heavy menstrual bleeding.手术与药物治疗月经过多的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jan 29;2016(1):CD003855. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003855.pub3.
7
Combined Endometrial Ablation and Levonorgestrel Intrauterine System Use in Women With Dysmenorrhea and Heavy Menstrual Bleeding: Novel Approach for Challenging Cases.子宫内膜切除术与左炔诺孕酮宫内节育系统联合用于痛经和月经过多的女性:针对复杂病例的新方法
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015 Nov-Dec;22(7):1203-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2015.06.012. Epub 2015 Jun 26.
8
A 52-mg levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system vs bipolar radiofrequency nonresectoscopic endometrial ablation in women with heavy menstrual bleeding: long-term follow-up of a multicenter randomized controlled trial.52 毫克左炔诺孕酮宫内缓释系统与双极射频非切除性子宫内膜消融治疗月经过多患者的比较:多中心随机对照试验的长期随访。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2024 May;230(5):542.e1-542.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2024.01.016. Epub 2024 Jan 26.
9
The combined use of endometrial ablation or resection and levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system in women with heavy menstrual bleeding: A systematic review.对于月经过多的女性,联合使用子宫内膜消融或切除术和左炔诺孕酮释放宫内节育系统:系统评价。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2021 Oct;100(10):1779-1787. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14219. Epub 2021 Jul 12.
10
Levonorgestrel-Releasing Intrauterine System (52 mg) for Idiopathic Heavy Menstrual Bleeding: A Health Technology Assessment.左炔诺孕酮宫内缓释系统(52毫克)用于特发性月经过多:一项卫生技术评估
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2016 Nov 1;16(18):1-119. eCollection 2016.

引用本文的文献

1
Which variables are associated with recruitment failure? A nationwide review on obstetrical and gynaecological multicentre RCTs (2003-2023).哪些变量与招募失败相关?一项关于妇产科多中心随机对照试验的全国性综述(2003 - 2023年)。
BMJ Open. 2025 Jan 21;15(1):e087766. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-087766.
2
Achieving successful outcomes with endometrial ablation needs better case selection.要通过子宫内膜消融术取得成功的治疗效果,需要更好地选择病例。
Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2024 Sep;16(3):249-251. doi: 10.52054/FVVO.16.3.042.
3
Outcome reporting for heavy menstrual bleeding.

本文引用的文献

1
The combined use of endometrial ablation or resection and levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system in women with heavy menstrual bleeding: A systematic review.对于月经过多的女性,联合使用子宫内膜消融或切除术和左炔诺孕酮释放宫内节育系统:系统评价。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2021 Oct;100(10):1779-1787. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14219. Epub 2021 Jul 12.
2
Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system versus endometrial ablation for heavy menstrual bleeding.左炔诺孕酮宫内节育系统与子宫内膜消融术治疗月经过多。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Feb;224(2):187.e1-187.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.08.016. Epub 2020 Aug 12.
3
Combined transcervical endometrial resection and levonorgestrel device treatment compared to transcervical endometrial resection for abnormal uterine bleed.
月经过多的结局报告
Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2022 Sep;14(3):201-203. doi: 10.52054/FVVO.14.3.031.
经宫颈子宫内膜切除术联合左炔诺孕酮宫内节育系统治疗与单纯经宫颈子宫内膜切除术治疗异常子宫出血的比较。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020 Nov;99(11):1554-1560. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13949. Epub 2020 Jul 20.
4
Prognostic Factors for the Failure of Endometrial Ablation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.子宫内膜消融术失败的预测因素:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Dec;134(6):1269-1281. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003556.
5
Comparison of Combined Bipolar Radiofrequency Impedance-Controlled Endometrial Ablation with Levonorgestrel Intrauterine System versus Bipolar Radiofrequency Endometrial Ablation Alone in Women with Abnormal Uterine Bleeding.比较联合双极射频阻抗控制子宫内膜消融术与单独使用左炔诺孕酮宫内节育系统治疗异常子宫出血的疗效。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020 Mar-Apr;27(3):774-780. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2019.05.022. Epub 2019 Jun 12.
6
Endometrial resection and ablation techniques for heavy menstrual bleeding.用于治疗月经过多的子宫内膜切除术和消融技术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jan 22;1(1):CD001501. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001501.pub5.
7
Predictors of Long-Term NovaSure Endometrial Ablation Failure.长期诺舒子宫内膜消融失败的预测因素。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2018 Nov-Dec;25(7):1255-1259. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2018.03.006. Epub 2018 Mar 14.
8
Valuing health-related quality of life: An EQ-5D-5L value set for England.重视与健康相关的生活质量:英国的EQ-5D-5L价值集。
Health Econ. 2018 Jan;27(1):7-22. doi: 10.1002/hec.3564. Epub 2017 Aug 22.
9
The role of pathologic evaluation of endometrial ablation resections in predicting ablation failure and adenomyosis in hysterectomy.子宫内膜消融切除术的病理评估在预测子宫切除术中消融失败及子宫腺肌病方面的作用。
Pathol Res Pract. 2016 Sep;212(9):778-82. doi: 10.1016/j.prp.2016.06.007. Epub 2016 Jun 23.
10
Dutch Tariff for the Five-Level Version of EQ-5D.EQ-5D五级版本的荷兰关税。
Value Health. 2016 Jun;19(4):343-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.01.003. Epub 2016 Mar 30.