• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在一级创伤中心评估威斯康星标准。

Assessment of the Wisconsin Criteria at a Level I Trauma Center.

机构信息

Department of Surgery; Division of Plastic Surgery, Albany Medical Center, Albany; and.

Department of Surgery; Division of Plastic Surgery, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY.

出版信息

J Craniofac Surg. 2022 Sep 1;33(6):1725-1729. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000008593. Epub 2022 Jun 28.

DOI:10.1097/SCS.0000000000008593
PMID:35761447
Abstract

The Wisconsin Criteria was developed for physicians evaluating facial trauma to determine the likelihood of facial fractures. Subsequent studies have not consistently validated these criteria. This study seeks to validate the Wisconsin Criteria and determine its utility in predicting operative facial fractures.Retrospective chart review of the trauma database registry at a Level I Trauma Center was conducted from September 2011 to May 2019. Adult patients who had a complete facial examination by otolaryngology or plastic surgery as well as a head computed tomography scan completed, were included. Fisher exact test was utilized for statistical analysis ( P < 0.05) and positive predictive value, and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated with a 95% confidence interval.After screening, 546 patients met eligibility, 448 had at least 1 finding of the Wisconsin Criteria, and 472 patients had facial fractures. The sensitivity of the Wisconsin Criteria for determining the presence of a facial fracture was 86.23%, the specificity was 44.59%, and the NPV was 33.67% ( P < .0001). Malocclusion was the criterion most specific in determining if a facial fracture was present (98.65%), and Glasgow Coma Score < 14 was the least specific (67.57%).The Wisconsin Criteria did aid in the identification of facial fractures in trauma patients with a comparable sensitivity, higher specificity, and much lower NPV than originally described. Further investigation should be done to validate the criteria in other large trauma centers.

摘要

威斯康星标准是为评估面部创伤的医生制定的,用于确定面部骨折的可能性。随后的研究并未一致验证这些标准。本研究旨在验证威斯康星标准,并确定其在预测手术性面部骨折中的效用。

对一级创伤中心的创伤数据库登记处进行了回顾性图表审查,时间为 2011 年 9 月至 2019 年 5 月。纳入了接受耳鼻喉科或整形外科全面面部检查以及头部计算机断层扫描的成年患者。采用 Fisher 精确检验进行统计学分析(P < 0.05),并计算阳性预测值和阴性预测值(NPV),置信区间为 95%。

筛选后,546 名患者符合入选标准,448 名患者至少有 1 项威斯康星标准,472 名患者有面部骨折。威斯康星标准确定存在面部骨折的敏感性为 86.23%,特异性为 44.59%,NPV 为 33.67%(P <.0001)。错牙合是确定是否存在面部骨折最特异的标准(98.65%),格拉斯哥昏迷评分<14 是最不特异的标准(67.57%)。

威斯康星标准确实有助于识别创伤患者中的面部骨折,其敏感性相当,特异性更高,NPV 远低于最初描述。应在其他大型创伤中心进一步验证该标准。

相似文献

1
Assessment of the Wisconsin Criteria at a Level I Trauma Center.在一级创伤中心评估威斯康星标准。
J Craniofac Surg. 2022 Sep 1;33(6):1725-1729. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000008593. Epub 2022 Jun 28.
2
External Validation of University of Wisconsin's Clinical Criteria for Obtaining Maxillofacial Computed Tomography in Trauma.威斯康星大学创伤患者获取颌面计算机断层扫描临床标准的外部验证
J Craniofac Surg. 2018 Mar;29(2):e167-e170. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000004240.
3
Blunt-mechanism facial fracture patterns associated with internal carotid artery injuries: recommendations for additional screening criteria based on analysis of 4,398 patients.与颈内动脉损伤相关的钝器伤所致面部骨折模式:基于对4398例患者的分析提出的额外筛查标准建议
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013 Dec;71(12):2092-100. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2013.07.005. Epub 2013 Aug 29.
4
Validation of Clinical Criteria for Obtaining Maxillofacial Computed Tomography in Patients With Trauma.创伤患者获取颌面计算机断层扫描临床标准的验证
J Craniofac Surg. 2015 Jun;26(4):1199-202. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000001712.
5
Validation of the "Wisconsin Criteria" for Obtaining Dedicated Facial Imaging and Its Financial Impact at a Level 1 Trauma Center.“威斯康星标准”在一级创伤中心获取专用面部成像的验证及其财务影响
Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr. 2020 Mar;13(1):4-8. doi: 10.1177/1943387520910020. Epub 2020 Mar 15.
6
Clinical criteria for obtaining maxillofacial computed tomographic scans in trauma patients.创伤患者获取颌面计算机断层扫描的临床标准。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 Mar;127(3):1270-1278. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182043ad8.
7
Facial computed tomography use in trauma patients who require a head computed tomogram.面部计算机断层扫描在需要头部计算机断层扫描的创伤患者中的应用。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004 Aug;62(8):913-8. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2003.12.026.
8
Examination of life-threatening injuries in 431 pediatric facial fractures at a level 1 trauma center.在一家一级创伤中心对431例小儿面部骨折中的危及生命损伤进行检查。
J Craniofac Surg. 2014 Sep;25(5):1825-8. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000001055.
9
Facial Fracture in the Setting of Whole-Body CT for Trauma: Incidence and Clinical Predictors.全身CT检查创伤时的面部骨折:发生率及临床预测因素
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015 Jul;205(1):W4-10. doi: 10.2214/AJR.14.13589.
10
Facial soft tissue injuries as an aid to ordering a combination head and facial computed tomography in trauma patients.面部软组织损伤有助于指导创伤患者进行头颅与面部联合计算机断层扫描检查。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005 May;63(5):651-4. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2004.10.009.

引用本文的文献

1
Standardized clinical examination of maxillofacial injury: fracture diagnostic accuracy across experience levels.颌面损伤的标准化临床检查:不同经验水平下骨折诊断的准确性
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2025 Jul 7;51(1):251. doi: 10.1007/s00068-025-02927-2.