• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

我们在生成真实世界证据方面能做到多真实?探索常规收集的行政数据在医疗器械评估中的应用机会。

How real can we get in generating real world evidence? Exploring the opportunities of routinely collected administrative data for evaluation of medical devices.

机构信息

Centre for Research on Health and Social Care Management, Bocconi University, Milano, Lombardia, Italy.

出版信息

Health Econ. 2022 Sep;31 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):25-43. doi: 10.1002/hec.4562. Epub 2022 Jun 28.

DOI:10.1002/hec.4562
PMID:35762465
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9796733/
Abstract

Real-world data are considered a potentially valuable source of evidence for assessing medical technologies in clinical practice, but their widespread use is hampered by numerous challenges. Using the case of coronary stents in Italy, we investigate the potential of administrative databases for estimating costs and health outcomes associated with the use of medical devices in real world conditions. An administrative dataset was created ad hoc by merging hospital records from patients admitted between 2013 and 2019 for stent implantations with ambulatory records, pharmaceutical use data and vital statistics. Health outcomes were multifold: all-cause and cardiac mortality and myocardial infarction, within 30 days, 1, 2, 5 years. Costs were estimated from the National Health System perspective. We used multivariable Cox models and propensity score (PS) methods (PS matching; stratification on PS; inverse probability of treatment weighting using PS; PS adjustment). 257,907 coronary stents were implanted in 113,912 patients. For all health outcomes and follow-up times, and across all methods, patients receiving drug-eluting stents (DES) presented lower risk. For all-cause mortality, the DES patient advantage over bare-metal stent (BMS) patients declined over time but remained significant even at 5 years. For myocardial infarction, results remained quite stable. The DES group presented lower cumulative total costs (ranging from 3264 to 2363 Euros less depending on methods). Our results confirm the consolidated evidence of the benefits of DES compared to BMS. The consistency of results across methods suggests internal validity of the study, while highlighting strengths and limitations of each depending on research context. Administrative data yield great potential to perform comparative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness analysis of medical devices provided certain conditions are met.

摘要

真实世界数据被认为是评估临床实践中医疗技术的潜在有价值的证据来源,但由于存在许多挑战,其广泛应用受到阻碍。本文以意大利的冠状动脉支架为例,研究了在真实条件下使用医疗设备的成本和健康结果的估计,探讨了利用行政数据库的潜力。通过合并 2013 年至 2019 年间因支架植入而住院的患者的医院记录与门诊记录、药物使用数据和生命统计数据,创建了一个专门的行政数据集。健康结果是多方面的:30 天内、1 年、2 年、5 年内的全因和心脏死亡率以及心肌梗死。从国家卫生系统的角度估计了成本。我们使用多变量 Cox 模型和倾向评分(PS)方法(PS 匹配;PS 分层;PS 逆概率处理加权;PS 调整)。在 113912 名患者中植入了 257907 个冠状动脉支架。对于所有健康结果和随访时间,以及所有方法,接受药物洗脱支架(DES)的患者风险较低。对于全因死亡率,DES 患者相对于裸金属支架(BMS)患者的优势随时间推移而下降,但即使在 5 年内仍然显著。对于心肌梗死,结果仍然相当稳定。DES 组的累积总成本较低(根据方法的不同,从 3264 欧元到 2363 欧元不等)。我们的结果证实了 DES 相对于 BMS 的获益的一致性证据。方法之间结果的一致性表明研究的内部有效性,同时根据研究背景突出了每种方法的优缺点。行政数据具有很大的潜力,可以在满足某些条件的情况下对医疗设备进行比较有效性和成本效益分析。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c70b/9796733/15f7b25803e7/HEC-31-25-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c70b/9796733/ea3a541084b2/HEC-31-25-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c70b/9796733/ef341acb5595/HEC-31-25-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c70b/9796733/15f7b25803e7/HEC-31-25-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c70b/9796733/ea3a541084b2/HEC-31-25-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c70b/9796733/ef341acb5595/HEC-31-25-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c70b/9796733/15f7b25803e7/HEC-31-25-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
How real can we get in generating real world evidence? Exploring the opportunities of routinely collected administrative data for evaluation of medical devices.我们在生成真实世界证据方面能做到多真实?探索常规收集的行政数据在医疗器械评估中的应用机会。
Health Econ. 2022 Sep;31 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):25-43. doi: 10.1002/hec.4562. Epub 2022 Jun 28.
2
Cost effectiveness of drug-eluting stents in acute myocardial infarction patients in Germany: results from administrative data using a propensity score-matching approach.药物洗脱支架在德国急性心肌梗死患者中的成本效果:基于倾向评分匹配方法的行政数据研究结果。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2012 Jul 1;10(4):235-48. doi: 10.2165/11597340-000000000-00000.
3
Drug-eluting stents compared to bare-metal stents improve short-term survival in patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention: a nationwide prospective analysis of the AMIS Plus registry.与裸金属支架相比,药物洗脱支架可提高接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性心肌梗死患者的短期生存率:AMIS Plus注册研究的全国性前瞻性分析。
Kardiol Pol. 2014;72(4):315-23. doi: 10.5603/KP.a2013.0346. Epub 2013 Dec 2.
4
Long-term outcomes following coronary drug-eluting- and bare-metal-stent implantation.冠状动脉药物洗脱支架和裸金属支架植入术后的长期结果。
Atherosclerosis. 2010 Jun;210(2):503-9. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2009.12.003. Epub 2009 Dec 6.
5
Drug-eluting or bare-metal stenting in patients with diabetes mellitus: results from the Massachusetts Data Analysis Center Registry.糖尿病患者的药物洗脱支架或裸金属支架置入术:来自马萨诸塞州数据分析中心注册研究的结果
Circulation. 2008 Nov 25;118(22):2277-85, 7p following 2285. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.820159. Epub 2008 Nov 10.
6
Comparison of newer-generation drug-eluting with bare-metal stents in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a pooled analysis of the EXAMINATION (clinical Evaluation of the Xience-V stent in Acute Myocardial INfArcTION) and COMFORTABLE-AMI (Comparison of Biolimus Eluted From an Erodible Stent Coating With Bare Metal Stents in Acute ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction) trials.比较新一代药物洗脱支架和裸金属支架在急性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者中的应用:EXAMINATION(急性心肌梗死中评价 Xience-V 支架的临床研究)和 COMFORTABLE-AMI(急性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死中生物可降解涂层雷帕霉素洗脱支架与裸金属支架的比较研究)试验的汇总分析。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Jan;7(1):55-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.07.012. Epub 2013 Dec 11.
7
Drug-eluting vs bare-metal stents in primary angioplasty: a pooled patient-level meta-analysis of randomized trials.药物洗脱支架与裸金属支架用于直接血管成形术的比较:一项随机试验的患者水平汇总Meta分析
Arch Intern Med. 2012 Apr 23;172(8):611-21; discussion 621-2. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2012.758.
8
Outcomes with various drug-eluting or bare metal stents in patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction: a mixed treatment comparison analysis of trial level data from 34 068 patient-years of follow-up from randomized trials.在 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者中,不同药物洗脱支架或金属裸支架的结局:来自随机试验 34068 患者年随访的试验水平数据的混合治疗比较分析。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Aug;6(4):378-90. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.113.000415. Epub 2013 Aug 6.
9
Long-term outcomes of drug-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents in saphenous vein graft disease: results from the Prairie "Real World" Stent Registry.药物洗脱支架与裸金属支架在静脉桥病变中的长期疗效:Prairie“真实世界”支架注册研究结果。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Jan 1;75(1):93-100. doi: 10.1002/ccd.22194.
10
Randomized comparison of cost-saving and effectiveness of oral rapamycin plus bare-metal stents with drug-eluting stents: three-year outcome from the randomized oral rapamycin in Argentina (ORAR) III trial.随机比较口服雷帕霉素加裸金属支架与药物洗脱支架的节省成本和效果:来自阿根廷随机口服雷帕霉素(ORAR)III 试验的三年结果。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Sep 1;80(3):385-94. doi: 10.1002/ccd.23352. Epub 2011 Dec 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Suitability of the Current Health Technology Assessment of Innovative Artificial Intelligence-Based Medical Devices: Scoping Literature Review.现行创新型基于人工智能的医疗器械卫生技术评估的适宜性:范围文献综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 May 13;26:e51514. doi: 10.2196/51514.
2
Coverage with evidence development for medical devices in Europe: Can practice meet theory?医疗器械的证据开发覆盖范围在欧洲:实践能否符合理论?
Health Econ. 2022 Sep;31 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):179-194. doi: 10.1002/hec.4478. Epub 2022 Feb 26.

本文引用的文献

1
To replicate or not to replicate? Insights and interpretations from a randomized trial duplication initiative.复制还是不复制?一项随机试验重复计划的见解与解读。
J Comp Eff Res. 2021 Sep;10(13):953-956. doi: 10.2217/cer-2021-0137. Epub 2021 Jun 22.
2
Do existing real-world data sources generate suitable evidence for the HTA of medical devices in Europe? Mapping and critical appraisal.现有的真实世界数据源能否为欧洲医疗器械的 HTA 提供合适的证据? 映射和批判性评价。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2021 Apr 26;37(1):e62. doi: 10.1017/S0266462321000301.
3
Real-World Evidence: Understanding Sources of Variability Through Empirical Analysis.
真实世界证据:通过实证分析理解变异性来源
Value Health. 2021 Jan;24(1):116-117. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2020.11.003. Epub 2020 Dec 19.
4
Replication of Randomized, Controlled Trials Using Real-World Data: What Could Go Wrong?真实世界数据中复制随机对照试验:可能会出什么问题?
Value Health. 2021 Jan;24(1):112-115. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2020.09.015. Epub 2020 Nov 20.
5
Usage of primary and administrative data to measure the economic impact of quality improvement projects.利用原始数据和管理数据来衡量质量改进项目的经济影响。
BMJ Open Qual. 2020 Apr;9(2). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2019-000712.
6
Drug-eluting or bare-metal stents for percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials.药物洗脱支架或金属裸支架经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:随机临床试验的系统评价和个体患者数据分析荟萃分析。
Lancet. 2019 Jun 22;393(10190):2503-2510. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30474-X. Epub 2019 May 2.
7
Real-world cost-effectiveness of drug-eluting stents vs. bare-metal stents for coronary heart disease-A five-year follow-up study.药物洗脱支架与金属裸支架治疗冠心病的真实世界成本效益比较-一项为期五年的随访研究。
Health Policy. 2019 Feb;123(2):229-234. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2018.11.010. Epub 2018 Nov 28.
8
All-cause mortality, cardiovascular events, and health care costs after 12 months of dual platelet aggregation inhibition after acute myocardial infarction in real-world patients: findings from the Platelet-aggregation Inhibition: Persistence with treatment and cardiovascular Events in Real world (PIPER) study.急性心肌梗死后真实世界患者接受12个月双联血小板聚集抑制治疗后的全因死亡率、心血管事件及医疗费用:血小板聚集抑制:真实世界中治疗持续性与心血管事件(PIPER)研究的结果
Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2018 Nov 20;14:383-392. doi: 10.2147/VHRM.S162004. eCollection 2018.
9
Health economic evaluations based on routine data in Germany: a systematic review.基于德国常规数据的卫生经济评估:一项系统综述
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Apr 10;18(1):268. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3080-3.
10
Comparison of drug eluting stents (DESs) and bare metal stents (BMSs) with STEMI: who received BMS in the era of 2nd generation DES?药物洗脱支架(DES)与裸金属支架(BMS)治疗ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)的比较:在第二代DES时代,哪些患者接受了BMS治疗?
Heart Lung. 2018 May-Jun;47(3):231-236. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2018.02.004. Epub 2018 Mar 12.