Division of Pediatric Dentistry and Public Health/Academic Affairs, UNC Adams School of Dentistry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
UNC Adams School of Dentistry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
J Dent Educ. 2022 Nov;86(11):1529-1534. doi: 10.1002/jdd.13014. Epub 2022 Jun 28.
Following the adoption of competency-based education in dentistry in the 1990s, entrustable professional activities (EPAs) were introduced in the field of medicine in the mid-2000s to help educators better determine the competence of trainees. More recently, the field of dental education has begun exploring EPAs as a framework for assessing competence while ensuring compliance with accreditation standards. This paper explores one dental school's process of preparing for implementation of a major curriculum change using an EPA assessment framework, shifting away from the use of singular assessments for competency determination to a global and longitudinal approach using a constellation of data to determine practice readiness. This paper describes how the EPA framework was developed, including the complementary capacities, assessment tool development and programming, and data reporting to follow learner progression and determine practice readiness. We discuss lessons learned leading up to implementation, and we position this perspective as a space to describe opportunities and complexities to consider when using a longitudinal assessment system. We attend to the tension between the current language of Commission of Dental Accreditation Standards as "competencies" and the evolving conversation of operationalizing EPAs while addressing accreditation Standards. To do this, we describe the process of finalizing our EPA framework and preparing for initial implementation in a new curriculum.
自 20 世纪 90 年代牙科采用基于能力的教育以来,21 世纪中期医学领域引入了可委托的专业活动 (EPAs),以帮助教育者更好地确定学员的能力。最近,牙科教育领域开始探索 EPAs 作为评估能力的框架,同时确保符合认证标准。本文探讨了一所牙科学校在使用 EPA 评估框架准备重大课程变更实施过程中的情况,从使用单一评估来确定能力转变为使用一系列数据进行全面和纵向评估,以确定实践准备情况。本文介绍了 EPA 框架的开发过程,包括补充能力、评估工具开发和编程以及数据报告,以跟踪学习者的进展并确定实践准备情况。我们讨论了实施前的经验教训,并将这一视角定位为描述使用纵向评估系统时需要考虑的机会和复杂性的空间。我们关注当前牙科认证标准委员会语言中的“能力”与实施 EPAs 的不断发展的对话之间的紧张关系,同时解决认证标准问题。为此,我们描述了最终确定我们的 EPA 框架的过程,并为新课程的初步实施做准备。