Suppr超能文献

根据导航工具设置和内镜类型评估导航辅助内镜的精度。

Evaluation of the precision of navigation-assisted endoscopy according to the navigation tool setup and the type of endoscopes.

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.

Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Geneva University Hospitals, Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil 4, 1205, Geneva, Switzerland.

出版信息

Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2022 Sep;164(9):2375-2383. doi: 10.1007/s00701-022-05276-w. Epub 2022 Jun 28.

Abstract

OBJECT

Preoperative image-based neuronavigation-assisted endoscopy during intracranial procedures is gaining great interest. This study aimed to analyze the precision of navigation-assisted endoscopy according to the navigation setup, the type of optic and its working angulation.

METHODS

A custom-made box with four screws was referenced. The navigation-assisted endoscope was aligned on the screws (targets). The precision on the navigation screen was defined as the virtual distance-to-target between the tip of the endoscope and the center of the screws. Three modifiers were assessed: (1) the distance D between the box and the reference array (CLOSE 13 cm - MIDDLE 30 cm - FAR 53 cm), (2) the distance between the tip of the endoscope and the navigation array on the endoscope (close 5 cm - middle 10 cm - far 20 cm), (3) the working angulation of the endoscope (0°-endoscope and 30°-endoscope angled at 90° and 45° with the box).

RESULTS

The median precision was 1.3 mm (Q1: 1.1; Q3: 1.7) with the best setting CLOSE/close. The best setting in surgical condition (CLOSE/far) showed a distance-to-target of 2.3 mm (Q1: 1.9; Q3: 2.5). The distance D was correlated to the precision (Spearman rho = 0.82), but not the distance d (Spearman rho = 0.04). The type of optic and its angulation with the box were also correlated to the precision (Spearman rho =  - 0.37). The best setting was the use of a 30°-endoscope angled at 45° (1.4 mm (Q1: 1.0; Q3: 1.9)).

CONCLUSION

Navigated-assisted endoscopy is feasible and offers a good precision. The navigation setup should be optimized, reducing the risk of inadvertent perifocal damage.

摘要

目的

基于术前图像的神经导航辅助内镜在颅内手术中越来越受到关注。本研究旨在根据导航设置、光学器件的类型及其工作角度分析导航辅助内镜的精度。

方法

采用一个带有四个螺丝的定制盒子作为参考。将导航辅助内镜与螺丝(目标)对齐。导航屏幕上的精度定义为内镜尖端与螺丝中心之间的虚拟目标距离。评估了三个修正器:(1)盒子与参考阵列之间的距离 D(接近 13cm- 中间 30cm- 远 53cm),(2)内镜上内镜尖端与导航阵列之间的距离(接近 5cm- 中间 10cm- 远 20cm),(3)内镜的工作角度(0°-内镜和 30°-内镜与盒子成 90°和 45°角)。

结果

中位数精度为 1.3mm(Q1:1.1;Q3:1.7),最佳设置为 CLOSE/close。手术条件下的最佳设置(CLOSE/far)显示目标距离为 2.3mm(Q1:1.9;Q3:2.5)。距离 D 与精度相关(Spearman rho=0.82),但距离 d 不相关(Spearman rho=0.04)。光学器件的类型及其与盒子的角度也与精度相关(Spearman rho=-0.37)。最佳设置是使用 30°-内镜,角度为 45°(1.4mm(Q1:1.0;Q3:1.9))。

结论

导航辅助内镜是可行的,精度良好。应优化导航设置,降低意外的周围组织损伤风险。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98ca/9427865/0363828077ce/701_2022_5276_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验