University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
St. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
J Neuropsychol. 2022 Sep;16(3):537-554. doi: 10.1111/jnp.12283. Epub 2022 Jun 28.
Discrepancies between subjective cognitive difficulties and objective measures of cognitive function in people with MS have been identified and may be related to mood and fatigue. The aim of the present study was to examine associations of depression and fatigue with discrepancies between subjective and objective cognitive functioning in pwMS. 177 participants with MS attending a University Hospital Department of Neurology MS Outpatient clinic completed the Brief International Cognitive Assessment for MS (BICAMS), MS Neuropsychological Questionnaire (MSNQ), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS). To quantify the discrepancy between objective (BICAMS) and subjective (MSNQ) cognitive functioning, discrepancy scores were calculated by subtracting MSNQ z-score from composite BICAMS z-score. Based on their discrepancy score, participants were grouped as 'Underestimated', 'Overestimated' and 'Non-discrepant'. 39% of the total sample demonstrated poorer subjective cognitive functioning than their objective cognitive performance suggested ('Underestimated'). 23% of the total sample indicated lower objective scores than their subjective report suggests ('Overestimated'). 38% participants indicated relatively no discrepancy between objective and subjective cognitive measures ('Non-discrepant'). Significant differences were observed between the discrepancy groups in terms of depression and fatigue, with the 'Underestimated' group demonstrating greater levels of depression and fatigue (ps < .01). Regression analysis indicated that cognitive fatigue and depression significantly contributed to variance in subjective cognitive functioning. Our findings suggest that subjective reports of cognitive function may be influenced by depression and fatigue, emphasising the importance of cognitive, mood and fatigue screening as part of routine clinical care.
在 MS 患者中,已经发现主观认知困难与客观认知功能测量之间存在差异,这种差异可能与情绪和疲劳有关。本研究旨在探讨抑郁和疲劳与 MS 患者主观和客观认知功能差异之间的关系。177 名在大学医院神经病学 MS 门诊就诊的 MS 患者完成了简明国际认知评估量表(BICAMS)、MS 神经心理学问卷(MSNQ)、医院焦虑抑郁量表(HADS)和改良疲劳影响量表(MFIS)。为了量化客观(BICAMS)和主观(MSNQ)认知功能之间的差异,通过从复合 BICAMS z 分数中减去 MSNQ z 分数来计算差异分数。根据他们的差异得分,参与者被分为“低估”、“高估”和“无差异”。总样本中有 39%的人主观认知功能比客观认知表现差(“低估”)。总样本中有 23%的人客观分数比主观报告低(“高估”)。38%的参与者表示客观和主观认知测量之间相对没有差异(“无差异”)。在抑郁和疲劳方面,差异组之间存在显著差异,“低估”组表现出更高水平的抑郁和疲劳(p<0.01)。回归分析表明,认知疲劳和抑郁显著影响主观认知功能的差异。我们的研究结果表明,认知功能的主观报告可能受到抑郁和疲劳的影响,这强调了在常规临床护理中进行认知、情绪和疲劳筛查的重要性。