Suppr超能文献

自体组织与器械辅助乳房重建术后乳房皮肤坏死的危险因素比较分析。

A Comparative Analysis of Risk Factors for Breast Skin Necrosis following Autologous versus Device-Based Breast Reconstruction.

机构信息

Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.

Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York.

出版信息

J Reconstr Microsurg. 2023 May;39(4):288-294. doi: 10.1055/a-1887-7645. Epub 2022 Jun 29.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Mastectomy skin flap necrosis often necessitates prolonged wound care, surgical re-excision, and it increases the risk for infection. This study aims to compare rates of skin flap necrosis between autologous and device-based reconstructions and identify risk factors.

METHODS

The authors retrospectively identified patients who underwent immediate breast reconstruction using either the deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap ( = 373 breasts, 41%) or tissue expanders ( = 529 breasts, 59%) by two surgeons at a single institution between 2011 and 2021. The rate of skin flap necrosis between autologous and device-based reconstructions was compared and multivariate regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in rates of skin flap necrosis between the two cohorts (26.8 vs. 15.5%,  = 0.052). Across all patients, hypertension and body mass index >30 were significant predictors of necrosis ( = 0.024 and <0.001, respectively). Within our DIEP cohort, mastectomy specimen weight was a significant risk factor for necrosis ( = 0.001). The DIEP flap weight itself did not confer a higher risk for necrosis ( = 0.8).

CONCLUSION

Immediate autologous reconstruction does not place patients at higher risk of skin necrosis. Hypertension and obesity (body mass index >30) were independent risk factors for necrosis in all patients. Mastectomy specimen weight was a significant predictor of necrosis in DIEP flap patients while the DIEP flap weight itself did not increase the risk for necrosis.

摘要

背景

乳房切除术皮瓣坏死常需要长时间的伤口护理、再次手术切除,并增加感染的风险。本研究旨在比较自体和器械重建的皮瓣坏死率,并确定风险因素。

方法

作者回顾性地确定了 2011 年至 2021 年间,两位外科医生在一家机构中使用深部下腹壁穿支皮瓣(DIEP)(=373 例乳房,41%)或组织扩张器(=529 例乳房,59%)进行即刻乳房重建的患者。比较了自体和器械重建的皮瓣坏死率,并进行了多变量回归分析以确定风险因素。

结果

两组皮瓣坏死率无显著差异(26.8%与 15.5%,=0.052)。在所有患者中,高血压和 BMI>30 是坏死的显著预测因素(=0.024 和 <0.001)。在我们的 DIEP 队列中,乳房切除术标本重量是坏死的显著危险因素(=0.001)。DIEP 皮瓣本身的重量并没有增加坏死的风险(=0.8)。

结论

即刻自体重建不会使患者面临更高的皮瓣坏死风险。高血压和肥胖(BMI>30)是所有患者坏死的独立危险因素。DIEP 皮瓣患者的乳房切除术标本重量是坏死的显著预测因素,而 DIEP 皮瓣本身的重量并不会增加坏死的风险。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验